We're the ones who are for equal opportunity, not you. We want everyone to have equal access to basic resources, like food, housing, education, and healthcare. A White person born into a middle-class or upper-middle class family, not to speak of whites born into wealth, has access to much more resources than a Black or Latino born in the ghetto. Socialists like me, want to make food, basic housing, education, healthcare, and jobs a human right, as other Western nations have done. We want to establish that here in the US as well.
Within a socialist society, those who are best qualified, would hopefully, make themselves known to the public or their local worker's council, and get elected into whatever position they're most qualified to have. I am 100% for the most qualified to get the job or leadership position. I'm against racist or sexist quotas that hurt people, undermining their ability to actualize their fullest potential.
As a socialist/commie, I'm also against open borders. The resources of the United States should be used to serve American citizens and legal residents, not all of Latin America or the whole planet. Capitalist-imperialist love their cheap labor and the American working-class fighting each other over jobs. They love that shit, because it keeps them in power. As long as working-class, middle-class whites are at war with working-class and middle-class blacks and latinos, they can't organize to defend and advance their common socioeconomic interests, against their capitalist masters.
Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, in his book The Wealth Of Nations, wrote:
What are the common wages of labor, depends every where upon the contract usually made between those two parties, whose interests are by no means the same. The workmen (the employees, the working-class) desire to get as much, the masters (the employers capitalist class, the wealthy elites) to give as little as possible. The former are disposed to combine (Form labor unions to collectively negotiate their terms of employment with their powerful, wealthy masters/employers) in order to raise, the latter in order to lower the wages of labor.
It is not, however, difficult to foresee which of the two parties must, upon all ordinary occasions, have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compliance with their terms. The masters, being fewer in number, can combine (The masters also "unionize", "unite", to advance their common socioeconomic class interests in the form of chambers of commerce, industry associations, and guilds, super-PACs, non-profit front organizations/NGOs, think tanks staffed by well-paid academics from ivy league universities, armies of lobbyists bribing politicians) much more easily; and the law, besides, authorizes, or at least does not prohibit their combinations, while it prohibits those of the workmen (makeing it impossible through criminalizing it or by not enacting any labor-protection laws). (Book I, Chapter VIII)
(EMPHASIS MINE)
If you are a working-class white person, realize that your masters want you to hate blacks and latinos, because if you are fighting the members of your own socioeconomic class, then the wealth and power of your masters, their control over the US government and resources both domestically and abroad in the developing "third world", is secure. The masters are strong and secure when we are weak and insecure.
Keeping the peasants at each other's throats is the primary tool and weapon the masters use to disarm and control the working-class. The other tool that they use is the carrot. Making their employees believe that if they work hard they will get rich too. After WWII, the United States was essentially unscathed compared to Western Europe, Russia and East Asia. The US became the world's manufacturing hub, creating an immense amount of wealth, for all Americans.
The American "middle-class" was born and sustained, in the golden age of our nation's economy, between 1950 and 1980. For the better part of thirty years, the US labor-force was the world's aristocracy of labor, with the highest standard of living. The best paid with the most benefits, living in a modern, industrialized, quickly expanding and developing, successful nation. It wasn't right-wing conservative economics and policies that created that wealthy golden age, but a heavily unionized working class, earning good wages, higher tax rates for the masters (the rich and powerful), and affordable food, housing, transportation, healthcare, and education..etc.
None of the above was created or maintained with laissez-faire "free market" capitalism but with plenty of government planning, infrastructure, and management. Ronald Reagan changed all of that, essentially gutting our working class by stripping them of their government-protected rights which allowed them to unionize, and destroying our manufacturing base by incentivizing American capitalists to rely on cheap foreign labor. He turned the American economy from one based on manufacturing hard goods - MADE IN THE USA, to one based on Wall Street speculative trading and finance, which imports everything from third-world countries.
If you want to make "America Great Again", then that entails adopting the economic policies we had before 1981, which were much more Keynesian (more leftist) than what we have today.
No. The Dems / Socialists are about equity - equality of outcome. That's standard Marxist ideology.
As your cutting and pasting made clear, revulsion for whites (self-loathing), is a pathology that grips the Dems / Socialists.