And there's your trademark phrase, "altered trinity translations". It's bogus, designed only to sound authoritative and shut down discussion. It also doesn't work, in case you haven't noticed.In your altered trinity translations, you are correct. But those spots contradict Jesus to the core.
See, here's your problem. You claim without evidence that the Scriptures we've been using for thousands of years are "altered", and apparently only in 1961 did anyone catch on and write new Scriptures without referring to the original languages. This, despite the plethora of copies we have found in the original languages that are astonishingly accurate in their transmittal of Scripture through the years.
Let's weigh the two. On the one hand, we have thousands of documents and document fragments from thousands of years all agreeing. On the other, we have a group of people in 1961 who can't read the original languages claiming they have "translated" brand new Scripture that contradicts what we have known for thousands of years.
The bottom line is, the only Scripture that's been "altered" is yours. It's not true to the original languages, it's altered.