New Studies Show Supreme Courts Imperial Behavior Really Is Unprecedented

I believe there can legitimately be more than one interpretation.
Of course there can. However, abortion and marriage laws aren't mentioned in the Constitution. Therefore, according to the Constitution they are state issues. Now you may not agree with that, but you're wrong, and that's why RvW was overturned and why same-sex marriage will be overturned.
 
Of course there can. However, abortion and marriage laws aren't mentioned in the Constitution. Therefore, according to the Constitution they are state issues. Now you may not agree with that, but you're wrong.
There is one right interpretation, and the others are all wrong.
 
Of course there can. However, abortion and marriage laws aren't mentioned in the Constitution. Therefore, according to the Constitution they are state issues. Now you may not agree with that, but you're wrong, and that's why RvW was overturned and why same-sex marriage will be overturned.

Again, as long as the Federal government is handing out benefits based upon one's marriage status, it's a federal issue. The government can not discriminate. Get rid of the benefits and I'll agree.

It's really irrelevant if same-sex marriage gets overturned now.
 
Again, as long as the Federal government is handing out benefits based upon one's marriage status, it's a federal issue. The government can not discriminate. Get rid of the benefits and I'll agree.

It's really irrelevant if same-sex marriage gets overturned now.
The Federal Govt doesn't give out marriage licences....they don't have the authority too.
 
Again, as long as the Federal government is handing out benefits based upon one's marriage status, it's a federal issue. The government can not discriminate. Get rid of the benefits and I'll agree.

It's really irrelevant if same-sex marriage gets overturned now.
Marriage benefits exist for the purpose of raising children, which is why homosexual marriage is a joke.
 
Then why give SS benefits to spouses?
why not? any retirement plan will allow you to give surivor benefits to the spouse....why should SS be any different? Retirement plans don't give out marriage licenses either
 
why not? any retirement plan will allow you to give surivor benefits to the spouse....why should SS be any different? Retirement plans don't give out marriage licenses either
SS isn't a retirement program. It's welfare. The spouses didn't put a dime into it.
 
SS isn't a retirement program. It's welfare. The spouses didn't put a dime into it.

Of course they did. Marriage is a partnership. For many one side of the equation does not work without the other.
 
Of course they did. Marriage is a partnership. For many one side of the equation does not work without the other.

Gay marriage is just two fuck buddies living together. What work do they share? Women originally got spousal benefits because they spent their who lives raising children. What does a gay fuck buddy spend his live doing?
 
SS isn't a retirement program. It's welfare. The spouses didn't put a dime into it.
Yes, it is a retirement plan....well was suppose to be.....and certainly spouses put money in if they work, if they don't work, some of the money was put in from spouse, taking money that would of been used in the home
 
Gay marriage is just two fuck buddies living together. What work do they share? Women originally got spousal benefits because they spent their who lives raising children. What does a gay fuck buddy spend his live doing?
what makes you think gay people can't raise children together?
 

Forum List

Back
Top