Calypso Jones
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2020
- 19,424
- 23,311
- 2,288
9 to 0.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
THEN WHO CAN?
9 to 0.
Conservative SC majority is now shedding any pretence still left to partisan impartiality.
Trump has little to stand on in his criminal trials, so his only end game is delaying them long enough to again make it to the White House and put himself above the law.
Nobody seriously thinks SC is going to grant Trump immunity, nobody thinks they will overturn iron-clad lower court ruling....but we have a Supreme Court that seems to be willing to use that excuse to play along and halt Trump's criminal trials for months, making it near impossible from them to complete before election.
It's been 135 days since Jack Smith asked the court to expedite descision on immunuty...nope! They insist on taking no less than 5 months to settle an obvious no-brainer outcome.
Even if there was some argument about how busy they are or how complex of case this is , they still didn't have to do it this way. SC could have simply allowed the trials to go on, while they square away these go-nowhere immunity claims.
In Taking Up Trump’s Immunity Claim, Supreme Court Bolstered His Delay Strategy
By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.www.nytimes.com
We knew Thomas was an unrepentant Trumptard and Alito is not far behind, but for the rest to go along with this ridiculous shit?
This marks a whole new low for Supreme Court, whole new level of partisanship and this is not going to end well.
Congress. It's in the decision, dipshit. The unanimous, 9-0 decision.
LOL
but no one charged with insurrection. Nothing but the democrat pipe dream to illegitimately hold onto power. Is it possible that the left is beginning its implosion. Hope so.Congress? We have House a majority whip who worked to overturn 2020 election for Dear Leader Trump.
Insurectionists are basically running the place and Supreme Court says it's this Congress that should keep the insurectionist of the ballot?
This is a joke.
COURTS should be ruling on eligibility questions, not politicos.
The vote was 9-0
LOL!
Even Jumanji Jackson, who does not know what a woman is, voted it down
Red Herring.but no one charged with insurrection. Nothing but the democrat pipe dream to illegitimately hold onto power. Is it possible that the left is beginning its implosion. Hope so.
Congress. It's in the decision, dipshit. The unanimous, 9-0 decision.
LOL
Conservative SC majority is now shedding any pretence still left to partisan impartiality.
Trump has little to stand on in his criminal trials, so his only end game is delaying them long enough to again make it to the White House and put himself above the law.
Nobody seriously thinks SC is going to grant Trump immunity, nobody thinks they will overturn iron-clad lower court ruling....but we have a Supreme Court that seems to be willing to use that excuse to play along and halt Trump's criminal trials for months, making it near impossible from them to complete before election.
It's been 135 days since Jack Smith asked the court to expedite descision on immunuty...nope! They insist on taking no less than 5 months to settle an obvious no-brainer outcome.
Even if there was some argument about how busy they are or how complex of case this is , they still didn't have to do it this way. SC could have simply allowed the trials to go on, while they square away these go-nowhere immunity claims.
In Taking Up Trump’s Immunity Claim, Supreme Court Bolstered His Delay Strategy
By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.www.nytimes.com
We knew Thomas was an unrepentant Trumptard and Alito is not far behind, but for the rest to go along with this ridiculous shit?
This marks a whole new low for Supreme Court, whole new level of partisanship and this is not going to end well.
AND? It is probably correct to keep individual states from being able to disqualify national candidates, but there needs to be a good answer to WHO has the final say on eligibility.
Red Herring.
According to this ruling Trump can be convicted of insurection and still eligible because House wouldn't disqualify him, wouldn't hold him to it.
It's not the right answer.
not the left.THEN WHO CAN?
By the way - House already voted that Trump was involved in the...wait for it....INSURECTION.
Congress.
Did you read the ruling?