Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
havent run awayYou made the claim, I asked you to back it up, and you run away like a bitch.dipshit, ask some of your lib buddies hereNo it hasn't. I asked for it in this thread and you haven't delivered.
Where? You haven't shown shit, and you haven't explained why any of her posts are stupid.
You lose, loser! Again!!!
LOL
maybe you'll trust them
Same old, same old.
S'okay...apparently they're rain-proof.Has anyone from the last election been sworn in yetDon't interrupt the moonbats' "victory" dance.
Sorry dave I didn't mean to rain on their parade.
For being wrong, as usual.Oh, look:OTOH, finding examples of daveman's stupidity is as easy as finding his most recent post. Or any post. Like this one.
How stupid does one have to be to, in a thread titled "Tea Party Activists Angry At G.O.P. Leaders", to then post that it's the Left who is bitching?
Answer: pretty fucking stupid. But that's dave for ya!Synth, if you had any integrity, you'd apologize.Note NO anger from the TP fro busiting the budget yet again , they just wnated MORE budget busting tax cuts.
What whores the TP people are.
But we both know you don't. You'll weasel out of it...again.
Apologize for WHAT?!?
Congratulations. You just added more proof to my claim: You're blaming a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet.TM is correct: Republican elites just held everything hostage to tax cuts for billionaires, adding $700 BILLION to the deficit, and teabaggers didn't say "boo".
S'okay...apparently they're rain-proof.
Sorry dave I didn't mean to rain on their parade.
No weaseling required. Obama's actions have slowed the recovery. If he hadn't forced his far-left agenda down our throats, we'd be a lot better off now.Did you thank Obama for the huge increase in the stock market? Or won't your hyper-partisanship allow it?Do you put on Chap Stick before you kiss Obama's ass?I hold him responsible for many things. Here's one (written back in September):
I'm sure you will weasel out of this, too.
Well, that's the Soros-funded narrative, at any rate.Yup. And you have to be blind, or an extreme wingnut, or an idiot to not see that the teabagger's goals are exactly the same as the goals of bilionaires. It's astroturf.The original Ron Paul teapartiers had something going for them until the entire movement was hijacked by Koch Industries. Now it's a pathetic laughing stock of America.
Yup. And you have to be blind, or an extreme wingnut, or an idiot to not see that the teabagger's goals are exactly the same as the goals of bilionaires. It's astroturf.The original Ron Paul teapartiers had something going for them until the entire movement was hijacked by Koch Industries. Now it's a pathetic laughing stock of America.
Tea Party?
Tool Party woulde be more apt.
The patented CON$ervative dumb act again.Yeah? So? Do you always let Rush do your thinking for you?If a CON$ervative wasn't a hypocrite, he'd have no principles at all.So...the Left are bitching about a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet...but still get their panties in a wad when anyone blames Obama for something, even though he's been in office for two years.
If a leftist didn't have double standards, he'd have no standards at all.
January 15,2009
RUSH: It's entirely fair to call this Obama's stock market because it's reacting to what Obama's plans are for the economy. It's not reacting to Bush. Bush isn't on anybody's mind here.
March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.
RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.
Pay attention, Ed. Read the words I wrote. Consider their meaning. Don't just post a Rush quote in response as if it invalidates my point -- because it doesn't.
You refuse to hold Obama responsible for anything, even though he's been in office for two years. But you're also blaming a GOP-controlled House when they haven't even been seated yet -- for actions made by the Democrat-controlled House.
Read it. Read it again. Recognize what you're doing, and the hypocrisy involved.
But you won't. I don't think you're capable.
More CON$ervative revisionist history. The term was coined in the 1980s by a Dem to describe a Right wing tactic.Yup. And you have to be blind, or an extreme wingnut, or an idiot to not see that the teabagger's goals are exactly the same as the goals of bilionaires. It's astroturf.The original Ron Paul teapartiers had something going for them until the entire movement was hijacked by Koch Industries. Now it's a pathetic laughing stock of America.
The only reason that term, astroturf, was used was because that is tactic #1 on the left. In fact it was perfected by David Axelrod, long before Barack Obama hit the US Senate.
It's no more ridiculous than the Right blaming Obama before he was even elected!!!!!Don't be stupid, unless, as I suspect, you simply can't help it.To those who are not completely OBLIVIOUS to the world around them, it means CON$ can dish it out but cry like little babies when the Golden Rule bites them in their hypocritical asses.yup, just like clockwork
edthemoron posts rush quotes as if it actually means anything
Can you acknowledge the simple fact that the GOP-led House hasn't even been seated yet? Do you recognize the ridiculousness of blaming them for anything?
Damn, dood. Act like you've got two neurons in spark-gap range.
"But you won't. I don't think you're capable."The patented CON$ervative dumb act again.Yeah? So? Do you always let Rush do your thinking for you?If a CON$ervative wasn't a hypocrite, he'd have no principles at all.
January 15,2009
RUSH: It's entirely fair to call this Obama's stock market because it's reacting to what Obama's plans are for the economy. It's not reacting to Bush. Bush isn't on anybody's mind here.
March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.
RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.
Pay attention, Ed. Read the words I wrote. Consider their meaning. Don't just post a Rush quote in response as if it invalidates my point -- because it doesn't.
You refuse to hold Obama responsible for anything, even though he's been in office for two years. But you're also blaming a GOP-controlled House when they haven't even been seated yet -- for actions made by the Democrat-controlled House.
Read it. Read it again. Recognize what you're doing, and the hypocrisy involved.
But you won't. I don't think you're capable.
The Right can blame Obama 5 months before he takes office and 3 months before he's even elected on the rationalization that everyone knew he would win, but even though everyone knew the GOP would win the House a year ago, the same rationalization the Right uses can't be applied to themselves!
To CON$ there's nothing hypocritical about that.
In fact, even though Bush cannot be blamed for something that happened 8 months into his presidency or anything that happened his last 2 years Dems can be blamed for perpetuity.
Again, CON$ can dish out the rationalizations, but as soon as you apply the same rationalization to them they whine and cry like little babies.
Yeah. I didn't blame him for anything. Your problem is you're incapable of seeing people as individuals.It's no more ridiculous than the Right blaming Obama before he was even elected!!!!!Don't be stupid, unless, as I suspect, you simply can't help it.To those who are not completely OBLIVIOUS to the world around them, it means CON$ can dish it out but cry like little babies when the Golden Rule bites them in their hypocritical asses.
Can you acknowledge the simple fact that the GOP-led House hasn't even been seated yet? Do you recognize the ridiculousness of blaming them for anything?
Damn, dood. Act like you've got two neurons in spark-gap range.
Again, CON$ can dish it out but throw a temper tantrum when their own rationalizations bite them in their hypocritical asses.
So...the Left are bitching about a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet...but still get their panties in a wad when anyone blames Obama for something, even though he's been in office for two years.
If a leftist didn't have double standards, he'd have no standards at all.
Again, only CON$ can generalize about "THE LEFT" but no one can generalize about the Right!Yeah. I didn't blame him for anything. Your problem is you're incapable of seeing people as individuals.It's no more ridiculous than the Right blaming Obama before he was even elected!!!!!Don't be stupid, unless, as I suspect, you simply can't help it.
Can you acknowledge the simple fact that the GOP-led House hasn't even been seated yet? Do you recognize the ridiculousness of blaming them for anything?
Damn, dood. Act like you've got two neurons in spark-gap range.
Again, CON$ can dish it out but throw a temper tantrum when their own rationalizations bite them in their hypocritical asses.
No weaseling required. Obama's actions have slowed the recovery. If he hadn't forced his far-left agenda down our throats, we'd be a lot better off now.Did you thank Obama for the huge increase in the stock market? Or won't your hyper-partisanship allow it?Do you put on Chap Stick before you kiss Obama's ass?
I'm sure you will weasel out of this, too.
Damn - you're kicking daveman's ass all over the place!So...the Left are bitching about a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet...but still get their panties in a wad when anyone blames Obama for something, even though he's been in office for two years.
If a leftist didn't have double standards, he'd have no standards at all.
Again, only CON$ can generalize about "THE LEFT" but no one can generalize about the Right!Yeah. I didn't blame him for anything. Your problem is you're incapable of seeing people as individuals.It's no more ridiculous than the Right blaming Obama before he was even elected!!!!!
Again, CON$ can dish it out but throw a temper tantrum when their own rationalizations bite them in their hypocritical asses.
Again, to CON$ there's nothing hypocritical about that at all.
stop claiming false victory jokeyDamn - you're kicking daveman's ass all over the place!So...the Left are bitching about a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet...but still get their panties in a wad when anyone blames Obama for something, even though he's been in office for two years.
If a leftist didn't have double standards, he'd have no standards at all.
Again, only CON$ can generalize about "THE LEFT" but no one can generalize about the Right!Yeah. I didn't blame him for anything. Your problem is you're incapable of seeing people as individuals.
Again, to CON$ there's nothing hypocritical about that at all.
No, idiot. The teabaggers are angry that the Republicans have not learned this so-called lesson of the midterms. Never mind that they don't understand what the real message was. They are fools who have been suckered.For being wrong, as usual.Oh, look:Synth, if you had any integrity, you'd apologize.
But we both know you don't. You'll weasel out of it...again.
Apologize for WHAT?!?
Congratulations. You just added more proof to my claim: You're blaming a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet.TM is correct: Republican elites just held everything hostage to tax cuts for billionaires, adding $700 BILLION to the deficit, and teabaggers didn't say "boo".
except your links story doesnt say they are angryNo, idiot. The teabaggers are angry that the Republicans have not learned this so-called lesson of the midterms. Never mind that they don't understand what the real message was. They are fools who have been suckered.For being wrong, as usual.Apologize for WHAT?!?
Congratulations. You just added more proof to my claim: You're blaming a Congress that hasn't even been seated yet.TM is correct: Republican elites just held everything hostage to tax cuts for billionaires, adding $700 BILLION to the deficit, and teabaggers didn't say "boo".
