They are busting Trump rght now in court

[Faun]

Wow..ok, yeah, the meme I posted above is true. You are simply just doing exactly that lol.

All I can do is refer you to post #621, tell you to read it again, and you should arrive at the explanation of why it’s relevant.

Holy fuck.

It's not relevant. What part of, Trump is charged with a felony (§ 175.10), not a misdemeanor (§ 175.05), is above your limited comprehension?

The statute of limitations for felonies in NY is 5 years. But that 5 year window pauses for certain circumstances...

4. In calculating the time limitation applicable to commencement of a criminal action, the following periods shall not be included:

(a) Any period following the commission of the offense during which
(i) the defendant was continuously outside this state​

Savvy??

In terms of the 5 year statute of limitations, the period of time in between Trump filing his business expenses and being indicted, doesn't include the time he was living in the White House.

---

Think about this...

Trump filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations expiring...

The judge, a NY state judge versed in NY state law, denied the motion for the reason above...

and here you are, pretending as if you know NY state law better than that NY state judge.

 

[Faun]

He would do ALL of those things if this case wasn't about justice but was always about tying Trump up in court so he can't campaign and trying to get a biased jury to return a guilty verdict even though Bragg hasn't produced a crime yet!

LOL

Your conspiracy theory is noted and laughed at.

 

[Faun]

I’ll take that as your white flag

Feel free to take it however you need to comfort yourself.

 

[Slade3200]

Haha yes there was, hence why the judge rejected it

She asked for more explanation for the reasons I stated. Not because it was a sweet heart deal.

 

[Slade3200]

Nothing sweetheart in the deal? Dude, if Hunter pled guilty to the gun charge he was given a deal where he'd be exempt from any other charge being brought to trial. That was what the judge looked at and asked Hunter's lawyer if he'd ever seen that kind of a deal before to which the lawyer had to reply that he hadn't.

Wrong. That’s what his lawyers wanted but not what the prosecution would agree to. That’s why the deal fell apart

 

[struth]

She asked for more explanation for the reasons I stated. Not because it was a sweet heart deal.

She rejected the deal, she’s not waiting on more explanations…it was “outside the norms”

 

[Slade3200]

She rejected the deal, she’s not waiting on more explanations…it was “outside the norms”

Wrong. Go back and read about what happened

 

[Man With A Plan]

LOL

Your conspiracy theory is noted and laughed at.

It's not a "theory" it's exactly what happened! The Biden White House coordinated these "lawfare" trials in order to make it as hard for Trump to campaign as possible. They thought it would get them another four year term but they underestimated Trump. The lawsuits have only made him stronger. He can campaign FROM New York and reach a nationwide audience and then when he goes on the road to campaign on weekends he has absolutely MASSIVE crowds waiting for him! Biden is lucky to get a hundred people to show up.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Are you just playing parrot for trumps lies? There is nothing unconstitutional about gag orders. They happen all the time in high profile cases.

Nope, no parrot here..what Merchan is doing, however, is just trying to silence Trump. Nothing Trump has said is detrimental to the case, he’s not speaking of case issues that are forbidden. He’s just saying how much of a scam this case is, and how much of an injustice it is, and sure, he may say the judge is corrupt. Merchan doesn’t like that so he is going to silence trump.

Trump still has free speech…even though Merchan may not like the speech, as long as trump isnt breaking any of the rules of the case, he should be allowed to speak

 

[ThisIsMe]

Holy fuck.

It's not relevant. What part of, Trump is charged with a felony (§ 175.10), not a misdemeanor (§ 175.05), is above your limited comprehension?

The statute of limitations for felonies in NY is 5 years. But that 5 year window pauses for certain circumstances...

4. In calculating the time limitation applicable to commencement of a criminal action, the following periods shall not be included:​

​

(a) Any period following the commission of the offense during which​

(i) the defendant was continuously outside this state​

Savvy??

In terms of the 5 year statute of limitations, the period of time in between Trump filing his business expenses and being indicted, doesn't include the time he was living in the White House.

---

Think about this...

Trump filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations expiring...

The judge, a NY state judge versed in NY state law, denied the motion for the reason above...

and here you are, pretending as if you know NY state law better than that NY state judge.

/facepalm

You apparently STILL didn’t read my post.



There IS NO 175.10 without the furtherance or commission of another CRIME……………….

Trump has not been charged with, tried, nor convicted of the CRIME………..without a CRIME. Bragg doesn’t have a lawful means to upgrade from 175.05 to 175.10

read the LAW that Bragg brought. I laid it all out in my post…even quoted the laws that he used. The LAW itself tells you that Bragg is wrong……

 

[Man With A Plan]

The whole conflict of interest thing in this case is breathtaking. The judge's daughter makes her living supporting Trump's political enemies. The judge himself contributed to Joe Biden's campaign. The Prosecutor ran for office on the promise to go after Trump. The prosecutions two main witnesses both have cashed in on their relationship with Trump...Stormy making more money than she's ever made selling her story to anti Trump media and Cohen asking for donations through his Twitter account.

I don't know what's more of a legal cesspool...the Alvin Bragg case or the Fani Willis case!

 

[postman]

It's not a "theory" it's exactly what happened! The Biden White House coordinated these "lawfare" trials in order to make it as hard for Trump to campaign as possible. They thought it would get them another four year term but they underestimated Trump. The lawsuits have only made him stronger.

These cases were all started as soon as they could legally do so.
Trump used the position of the presidency to delay any case even being started while he was in office. Thus the starting flag didn't drop until after January 20th 2021.

Add the months it takes to get the information for an indictment, and change that to years, because Trump stalled the subpoenas, appealing them all the way to the Supreme Court (twice), delaying the cases still further.

All of those cases could have been resolved before 2024.

 

[postman]

The prosecutions two main witnesses both have cashed in on their relationship with Trump...Stormy making more money than she's ever made selling her story to anti Trump media and Cohen asking for donations through his Twitter account.

Ironically, Trump has raised more money off those cases, than he previously raised just running for office.

 

[Man With A Plan]

These cases were all started as soon as they could legally do so.
Trump used the position of the presidency to delay any case even being started while he was in office. Thus the starting flag didn't drop until after January 20th 2021.

Add the months it takes to get the information for an indictment, and change that to years, because Trump stalled the subpoenas, appealing them all the way to the Supreme Court (twice), delaying the cases still further.

All of those cases could have been resolved before 2024.

With all due respect, Postman? If you think it takes three years to get an indictment? You either don't know how our legal system works or you're covering for what's an obvious case of election interference. Do you really think it's a coincidence that all four of these trials are occurring in the middle of campaign season? That Trump is forced to sit in that New York City courtroom four days a week? That he has a gag order imposed on him by a judge? That he was hit with a half a Billion dollar judgement in a case that had no victim? What's happening right now is because the Democrats have perverted the Justice System and are using it as a political weapon against their chief political rival...something I've NEVER seen before in this country!

 

[Faun]

It's not a "theory" it's exactly what happened! The Biden White House coordinated these "lawfare" trials in order to make it as hard for Trump to campaign as possible. They thought it would get them another four year term but they underestimated Trump. The lawsuits have only made him stronger. He can campaign FROM New York and reach a nationwide audience and then when he goes on the road to campaign on weekends he has absolutely MASSIVE crowds waiting for him! Biden is lucky to get a hundred people to show up.

It appears Trump committed the crimes for which he's been charged. He's been rightfully charged. All you have are conspiracy theories.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Ironically, Trump has raised more money off those cases, than he previously raised just running for office.

People see what is an obvious wrong and are reacting to it.
Democrats thought they had a plan to knee cap Trump's campaign and it's not working. The more they've used the Justice System to attack Trump the stronger he's gotten. But then again...what choice did they have? They can't run on Biden's record. That's a political dumpster fire. They can't even run on lies because Joe can't read his lines at this point and people quite frankly just don't believe what he says anymore.

 

[postman]

With all due respect, Postman? If you think it takes three years to get an indictment? You either don't know how our legal system works or you're covering for what's an obvious case of election interference.

An indictment based on information in Trumps tax returns?
It took three years for congress to get Trumps tax returns. And almost as long before a prosecutor could get them.
Trump fought each and every subpoena, meaning the collection of that evidence was delayed by months or even years.

 

[Faun]

/facepalm

You apparently STILL didn’t read my post.



There IS NO 175.10 without the furtherance or commission of another CRIME……………….

Trump has not been charged with, tried, nor convicted of the CRIME………..without a CRIME. Bragg doesn’t have a lawful means to upgrade from 175.05 to 175.10

read the LAW that Bragg brought. I laid it all out in my post…even quoted the laws that he used. The LAW itself tells you that Bragg is wrong……

He doesn't need to be charged with another crime. Holt fuck. Where does it state he needs to be charged with another crime? All it says is he had to falsify business records with an intent to commit another crime or to aid another crime or to conceal another crime.

His falsified records concealed Cohen's crime.

 

[Man With A Plan]

It appears Trump committed the crimes for which he's been charged. He's been rightfully charged. All you have are conspiracy theories.

You can't even come up with the "crime" that Trump supposedly committed, Faun! It's why the prosecution just put Stormy on the stand. They're going for character assassination at this point because their case is rapidly falling apart and that's all they've got. Now we're going to watch Michael Cohen get ripped to shreds on the stand starting tomorrow at which point the prosecution is going to rest without EVER proving that a crime was committed.

 

[postman]

Do you really think it's a coincidence that all four of these trials are occurring in the middle of campaign season?

Actually if not for Trumps constant and endless delay tactics, like appealing his tax return subpoenas all the way to the supreme court, even after losing the first such case.
and don't forget his claim of absolute presidential immunity, which has stalled two more cases.

The only reason all four cases came up during election season, is that Trump was unable to delay them until after election day.