1-6-2021

[LeftofLeft]

What do you think I'm missing from the Babbit shooting?

That her not heeding the LEO’s commands and representing a threat to the officer causing him to open fire is like so many of the cases where an unarmed Black suspect did not heed the officer’s commands and shots were fired by the officer resulting in death and a riot in cities over the incident.

When Bobbit was shot, protest-turned riot was already in progress but it was not over her getting shot. This brings up another point. Lt. Michael Byrd was in a position to defend the Capitol, its members, staff, himself and fellow officers. He opened fire because of a protestor with other protesters were not heeding commands and represented a threat. In doing so, did he set a precedent? Namely, next time protestors are jumping on police cars, pushing on police officers physically, or throwing projectiles at them, can police officers point to Byrd shooting Babbit as precedent and justification?

 

[IM2]

Wow IM#2, you're sure a deep thinker. Must really smell down there.

Weak comeback.

 

[MarcATL]

That her not heeding the LEO’s commands and representing a threat to the officer causing him to open fire is like so many of the cases where an unarmed Black suspect did not heed the officer’s commands and shots were fired by the officer resulting in death and a riot in cities over the incident.

When Bobbit was shot, protest-turned riot was already in progress but it was not over her getting shot. This brings up another point. Lt. Michael Byrd was in a position to defend the Capitol, its members, staff, himself and fellow officers. He opened fire because of a protestor with other protesters were not heeding commands and represented a threat. In doing so, did he set a precedent? Namely, next time protestors are jumping on police cars, pushing on police officers physically, or throwing projectiles at them, can police officers point to Byrd shooting Babbit as precedent and justification?

I've seen many of your types say it was a good shoot when an unarmed Black man was shot in the back while running away just because they were scared. As in during traffic stops. The officer wasn't heard on camera saying to stop either, simply point and shoot.

Like I said, details matter.

Why aren't you correcting your fellow rightwingers that they are wrong about Babbit and that she needed to be put down based on her actions?

 

[WEATHER53]

Lib loon celebration if a staged event designed to forever prohibit anyone from ever questioning election results that favor Dems

 

[IM2]

Lib loon celebration if a staged event designed to forever prohibit anyone from ever questioning election results that favor Dems

And you really think this makes sense.

 

[WEATHER53]

And you really think this makes sense.

Hasn’t your 5 year old pacifier worn out yet

 

[the watcher]

I think we will see the return of the addict centers like the opium dens in the 1800's. where people paid to smoke opium and escape the real world. Someone will open up liberal dens where there is mood lighting, incense burning, and wooden beds they can lie in and listen to Taylor Swift songs and watch reruns of Obama and Biden speeches. For an extra fee they can be whipped by an attendant dressed like Nancy Pelosi.

 

[DonGlock26]

How sad to see you using the derogatory maggot term and siding with the most biased Racist on USMB.

 

[marvin martian]

On January 6th, 2021, Donald Trump was still the president. So then the story is that Donald Trump ordered the FBI to put on a false flag operation using assets to attack the capital to overturn an election and to possibly harm his VP if he did not comply with Trump's orders. This is the only way the right-wing story could be possible since Trump was the president. The FBI was run by a Trump appointee. The DOJ was stuffed by trump appointees.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I've seen many of your types say it was a good shoot when an unarmed Black man was shot in the back while running away just because they were scared. As in during traffic stops. The officer wasn't heard on camera saying to stop either, simply point and shoot.

Like I said, details matter.

Why aren't you correcting your fellow rightwingers that they are wrong about Babbit and that she needed to be put down based on her actions?

I've seen many of your types say it was a good shoot when an unarmed Black man was shot in the back while running away just because they were scared. As in during traffic stops. The officer wasn't heard on camera saying to stop either, simply point and shoot.

Like I said, details matter.

Why aren't you correcting your fellow rightwingers that they are wrong about Babbit and that she needed to be put down based on her actions?

Details do matter. Here’s a detail, I’ve gone against many people on these boards who agree with my posts when it comes to Babbit. As for “my types”, if there is a case where the police shot anyone while running away, I will take a look at all of the details and most likely side with the victim. I think Lt. Byrd set a precedent by shooting a rioter that did not heed LEO orders and represented a threat. Based on that criteria, why shouldn’t a LEO fire back at rioters who are jumping on police cars while they are in them or shoot someone who throws a brick at them after they were told to back off?

 

[Nostra]

Yes, because it was a good shoot.

She should have simply complied to a lawful command by the LEO.

So should have George Floyd.

 

[marvin martian]

Unintelligible.
Try again, retard.

You got bullied a lot for your low IQ, didn't you?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I've seen many of your types say it was a good shoot when an unarmed Black man was shot in the back while running away just because they were scared.

Link?

 

[MarcATL]

Details do matter. Here’s a detail, I’ve gone against many people on these boards who agree with my posts when it comes to Babbit. As for “my types”, if there is a case where the police shot anyone while running away, I will take a look at all of the details and most likely side with the victim. I think Lt. Byrd set a precedent by shooting a rioter that did not heed LEO orders and represented a threat. Based on that criteria, why shouldn’t a LEO fire back at rioters who are jumping on police cars while they are in them or shoot someone who throws a brick at them after they were told to back off?

I'm not sure there's historical precedence of people on the left throwing bricks at police and then complaining that they were shot. You'd have to show me that evidence.

But it seems we agree, details matter.

 

[BackAgain]

How sad to see you using the derogatory maggot term and siding with the most biased Racist on USMB.

By not unexpected.

 

[BackAgain]

I'm not sure there's historical precedence of people on the left throwing bricks at police and then complaining that they were shot. You'd have to show me that evidence.

But it seems we agree, details matter.

You have to be kidding.

 

[daveman]

Desperate are the claims Trump has made and you repeat.

Ahhh, your old stand-by: NO U.

Dismissed, kid.

 

[daveman]

Indeed you are.

I have no reason to be desperate.

Democrats, however, do. Hence the OP.

 

[daveman]

Who else did then, dope?
Who else had the authority to do so?

You really haven't been paying attention, have you?

FBI management, without orders, and with the cooperation of high-level Democrats, orchestrated and encouraged the break-in of the Capitol building.

Now, predictable, you will screech NUH_UH!!, as if your denials mean anything.

Surprise me. Don't.

 

[daveman]

Not two brain cells of adequate strength to even generate a spark of sense in this bunch. Not a breath of decency to be had.

Y’all will ruminate as the bitter twats you are.

YOU BITTER TWATS ARE NOT DECENT PEOPLE.

You really don't see anything wrong with saying that, do you, you flaming retard?