A comprehensive examination of liberalism

[owebo]

"I'm saying, very unreservedly, that all progress comes as a response to a threat" - Saul Alinsky

Perfectly summarizes progressivism.

Saul Alinsky Part III

(12:00 minute mark in the audio for anyone interested)

Trump is a moron, a threat to the nation and he lost. The next GOP candidate is not so much. Point proven.

You are going to hate the next 8 years of Trump.....

 

[P@triot]

 

[P@triot]

"I'm saying, very unreservedly, that all progress comes as a response to a threat" - Saul Alinsky

Perfectly summarizes progressivism.

Saul Alinsky Part III

(12:00 minute mark in the audio for anyone interested)

Trump is a moron, a threat to the nation and he lost. The next GOP candidate is not so much. Point proven.

No argument there. Trump is a moron. Sadly for the U.S. - Hitlery Clinton is even a bigger moron and corrupt.

 

[P@triot]

The quintessential liberal right here. Big mouth. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unethical. And a sexually deviant.

Anthony Weiner's Chats With 15-Year-Old Girl Under Investigation

 

[P@triot]

 

[P@triot]

So much for the progressive narrative that they are the party of "change". They keep feeding themselves more of the same, tired, old Dumbocrat nonsense. Donald Trump is the ultimate change (from never being in office before, to how he ran a campaign, to how he says what he wants to say and doesn't give a damn what anybody thinks). And he's a life long Dumbocrat. So one has to wonder why progressives hate him so much? Maybe they see progressivism for what it really is (vile, evil, disgusting, disgraceful, despicable, etc.) when it marches along with a fake, tiny little (R) behind it...

Trump scored his first major newspaper endorsement of the cycle yesterday when the Sheldon Adelson-owned Las Vegas Review-Journal endorsed him for President. According to the newspaper’s editorial board, “[h]istory tells us that agents for reform often generate fear and alarm among those intent on preserving their cushy sinecures. It’s hardly a shock, then, that the 2016 campaign has produced a barrage of unceasing vitriol directed toward Mr. Trump.”

Donald Trump scores his first major newspaper endorsement

 

[P@triot]

Progressive policy at its finest here. And to think that this is exactly what progressives desperately want to bring here to America. Confiscate all firearms. Implement socialism. Watch everyone wallow in extreme poverty and misery "equally".

However, since Chavez imposed what he and his followers proudly called “21st- Century Socialism” on one of the wealthiest nations in South America, Venezuela has been in economic, political and social free fall. Disarming the country won’t work, but one can certainly understand current President Nicolas Maduro’s desire to disarm as many Venezuelans as possible. He and his cronies are increasingly worried that an angry and frustrated populace could turn his country into a revolutionary cauldron.

Venezuela faces collapse because of socialist government, disarmed populace

 

[P@triot]

 

[regent]

Progressive policy at its finest here. And to think that this is exactly what progressives desperately want to bring here to America. Confiscate all firearms. Implement socialism. Watch everyone wallow in extreme poverty and misery "equally".

However, since Chavez imposed what he and his followers proudly called “21st- Century Socialism” on one of the wealthiest nations in South America, Venezuela has been in economic, political and social free fall. Disarming the country won’t work, but one can certainly understand current President Nicolas Maduro’s desire to disarm as many Venezuelans as possible. He and his cronies are increasingly worried that an angry and frustrated populace could turn his country into a revolutionary cauldron.

Venezuela faces collapse because of socialist government, disarmed populace

Are you saying that America will wallow in extreme poverty if the government took away citizens firearms and instituted another program like social security?. As I remember conservatives said nothing about poverty when they fought Social Security in the Thirties, but rather it was communism that would soon engulf the US because of Social Security.

 

[P@triot]

Progressive policy at its finest here. And to think that this is exactly what progressives desperately want to bring here to America. Confiscate all firearms. Implement socialism. Watch everyone wallow in extreme poverty and misery "equally".

However, since Chavez imposed what he and his followers proudly called “21st- Century Socialism” on one of the wealthiest nations in South America, Venezuela has been in economic, political and social free fall. Disarming the country won’t work, but one can certainly understand current President Nicolas Maduro’s desire to disarm as many Venezuelans as possible. He and his cronies are increasingly worried that an angry and frustrated populace could turn his country into a revolutionary cauldron.

Venezuela faces collapse because of socialist government, disarmed populace

Are you saying that America will wallow in extreme poverty if the government took away citizens firearms and instituted another program like social security?. As I remember conservatives said nothing about poverty when they fought Social Security in the Thirties, but rather it was communism that would soon engulf the US because of Social Security.

Well you don't remember right. They said it was communism and that it was unsustainable. They've been proven correct on both accounts.

 

[P@triot]

Another day, another liberal lie, and another example of disgusting and deplorable hypocrisy.

The Claim
Republicans are "obstructionists" who block legislation.

The Truth
Democrats practically invented obstructionism.

The Hypocrisy
The very Democrats now seeking to manufacture confirmation controversy personally devised and carried out a systematic effort to block President Bush’s judicial nominees through an unprecedented use of the Senate filibuster

It is a matter of historical record that beginning in 2001, Senate Democrats dramatically changed the confirmation process. Throughout the Bush administration, Democrats actively sought to block numerous judicial nominees, forcing more than 30 cloture votes as Republicans tried to end persistent Democratic filibuster efforts.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), voted against cloture a record-setting 27 times. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), cast 26 votes to filibuster Bush nominees and, in 2003, defiantly declared: “Yes, we are blocking judges by filibuster. That is part of the hallowed process around here.”

Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who now claims to have been “respectful of President Bush’s appointments,” repeatedly joined with Democratic colleagues in attempting to filibuster judicial confirmations, including seven separate votes against cloture for the nomination of Miguel Estrada—one of the nation’s leading appellate lawyers—to the D.C. Circuit.

Not to be outdone, Reid took virtually every opportunity to block Bush nominees, voting against cloture on 26 separate occasions. In his view there was no amount of time—“not a number in the universe”—that would be adequate for debate on the filibustered nominees.

Democratic hypocrisy

 

[emilynghiem]

Another day, another liberal lie, and another example of disgusting and deplorable hypocrisy.

The Claim
Republicans are "obstructionists" who block legislation.

The Truth
Democrats practically invented obstructionism.

The Hypocrisy
The very Democrats now seeking to manufacture confirmation controversy personally devised and carried out a systematic effort to block President Bush’s judicial nominees through an unprecedented use of the Senate filibuster

It is a matter of historical record that beginning in 2001, Senate Democrats dramatically changed the confirmation process. Throughout the Bush administration, Democrats actively sought to block numerous judicial nominees, forcing more than 30 cloture votes as Republicans tried to end persistent Democratic filibuster efforts.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), voted against cloture a record-setting 27 times. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), cast 26 votes to filibuster Bush nominees and, in 2003, defiantly declared: “Yes, we are blocking judges by filibuster. That is part of the hallowed process around here.”

Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who now claims to have been “respectful of President Bush’s appointments,” repeatedly joined with Democratic colleagues in attempting to filibuster judicial confirmations, including seven separate votes against cloture for the nomination of Miguel Estrada—one of the nation’s leading appellate lawyers—to the D.C. Circuit.

Not to be outdone, Reid took virtually every opportunity to block Bush nominees, voting against cloture on 26 separate occasions. In his view there was no amount of time—“not a number in the universe”—that would be adequate for debate on the filibustered nominees.

Democratic hypocrisy

Simple P@triot
If people want cooperation instead of obstruction,
then create laws and reforms by a CONSENSUS process that includes the input and answers the objections of others.

If you go into the democratic process forcing your ways, agenda or beliefs on others,
such as with ACA, the LGBT policies that are contested, etc,
KNOWING there are objections being VOCALLY and VISIBLY communicated,
then of course you are going to meet with opposition.

Had people LISTENED and resolve the grievances and reasons for objections,
maybe we'd solve the problems BEFORE passing laws.

Instead of what Pelosi said, about "passing laws first so we can find out what's in them."

What a concept, to INCLUDE representation of all other people who are affected by laws!
Imagine that!

 

[CowboyTed]

Another day, another liberal lie, and another example of disgusting and deplorable hypocrisy.

The Claim
Republicans are "obstructionists" who block legislation.

The Truth
Democrats practically invented obstructionism.

The Hypocrisy
The very Democrats now seeking to manufacture confirmation controversy personally devised and carried out a systematic effort to block President Bush’s judicial nominees through an unprecedented use of the Senate filibuster

It is a matter of historical record that beginning in 2001, Senate Democrats dramatically changed the confirmation process. Throughout the Bush administration, Democrats actively sought to block numerous judicial nominees, forcing more than 30 cloture votes as Republicans tried to end persistent Democratic filibuster efforts.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), voted against cloture a record-setting 27 times. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), cast 26 votes to filibuster Bush nominees and, in 2003, defiantly declared: “Yes, we are blocking judges by filibuster. That is part of the hallowed process around here.”

Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who now claims to have been “respectful of President Bush’s appointments,” repeatedly joined with Democratic colleagues in attempting to filibuster judicial confirmations, including seven separate votes against cloture for the nomination of Miguel Estrada—one of the nation’s leading appellate lawyers—to the D.C. Circuit.

Not to be outdone, Reid took virtually every opportunity to block Bush nominees, voting against cloture on 26 separate occasions. In his view there was no amount of time—“not a number in the universe”—that would be adequate for debate on the filibustered nominees.

Democratic hypocrisy

Well thats a load of crap...

Just paint over who was in charge and you get obvious proof of GOP Obstructionism...

 

[P@triot]

Another day, another liberal lie, and another example of disgusting and repulsive left-wing hypocrisy.

The Claim
Guns are so dangerous, blood is running in the streets, and the founders never meant for citizens to have firearms.

The Truth
Gun ownership is at an all-time high and we continue to see crime numbers plummet at the same time. In addition, as more states (all 50 now) have approved conceal carry, crime has drastically reduced as well.

The Hypocrisy
The left-wing lunatics like the Clinton's, Obama's, and Kardashian's continue to call for firearms to be outlawed while they are surrounded by an arsenal of fully-automatic weapons.

2nd Amendment: Good Enough for Kim Kardashian, But Not You

 

[P@triot]

The progressive hypocrites who claim to care soooooo much about people declare that they don’t want homeless people near them or living around them.

California residents in affluent cities don’t want the homeless housed in their neighborhoods

 

[emilynghiem]

The progressive hypocrites who claim to care soooooo much about people declare that they don’t want homeless people near them or living around them.

California residents in affluent cities don’t want the homeless housed in their neighborhoods

P@triot I thought CA had more developed mental health services there
than in TX or other states.

Do they have THAT much overcrowding and overflow?

If CA can't manage their own homeless populations,
why would their sanctuary cities invite more people in?

Shouldn't they take care of the people they already have?

No wonder their mental health system is overfull.
If you aren't crazy for living there, you will be!

 

[P@triot]

She embodies everything about the left - hatred, anger, violence, ignorance, promiscuity, immaturity, unsophisticated, horrible parenting, and lacking all basic manners.

Fresno State's Randa Jarrar: I Hate the White Patriarchy but I Still Suck White D*ck | Breitbart

 

[easyt65]

'A comprehensive examination of liberalism'

"See 'NFL CONCUSSIIN RESEARCH STUDY'"

Many scientists believe now that both 'Liberalism' and 'Large Violent Colisions that Physically Danage the Brain result in brain damage over time, the more exposed to both resulting in more Dim crimes exposed...