A REAL Canadian

[rtwngAvngr]

Unless i'm mistaken, we get fox news. Well the last time a had the pleasure of watching fox it was on, but it has been a month or so.

Well good for you if you do. I had heard you didn't, but I could be wrong. ON THIS!

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Sorry, but I have plenty tolerance for economic realities, sorry to disappoint. You accuse, but you have no footing. Or is going to school, working at a job and putting in the time to develop skills for advancement in order to increase my pay just the new socialist tactic for world socialist revolution.

No, but your advocacy of socialized medicine and the destruction of free markets in the medical arena is.

 

[Isaac Brock]

No, but your advocacy of socialized medicine and the destruction of free markets in the medical arena is.

Well then at lest we're all in good company since all the top countries, save the United States, that provide healthcare have at least partially socialized medicine as I showed in the thread about socialized medicine. In addition all the G8 countries if my memory serves me correctly, save the United States, have partially socialized healthcare.

Universal healthcare of the world unite?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Well then at lest we're all in good company since all the top countries, save the United States, that provide healthcare have at least partially socialized medicine as I showed in the thread about socialized medicine. In addition all the G8 countries if my memory serves me correctly, save the United States, have partially socialized healthcare.

Universal healthcare of the world unite?

:duh3:

 

[Isaac Brock]

Yes, you did give me that impression, glad to hear it isn't the case.

I'm glad. That wasn't where I was was going with it at all.

Which is accept everything, or imposing certain limits on what is seemingly unimportant and unnessesary for Canadians to accept? The impression I came away with after reading your post was somewhat mixed. Maybe you stated this earlier, and I missed it somewhere. I'll be honest, I'm seriously suffering from brain drain these days.

Not accept everything, accept everyone and let Canada's society compete on its own merits. Call it the "free-market" of social change if you will.

A good compare/contrast would be Canada and Switzerland. Both free countries, both diverse and racially/culturally/religiously tolerant. Canada has an open immigration policy, Switzerland has a closed immigration, or rather citizenship, policy. Immigrants can live in both countries, but in Canada they have citizenship and have the right to change Canada's course. In Switzerland, they do not have voting rights. Neither country is intolerant, just different views on how society interacts with itself.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

I'm glad. That wasn't where I was was going with it at all.



Not accept everything, accept everyone and let Canada's society compete on its own merits. Call it the "free-market" of social change if you will.

A good compare/contrast would be Canada and Switzerland. Both free countries, both diverse and racially/culturally/religiously tolerant. Canada has an open immigration policy, Switzerland has a closed immigration, or rather citizenship, policy. Immigrants can live in both countries, but in Canada they have citizenship and have the right to change Canada's course. In Switzerland, they do not have voting rights. Neither country is intolerant, just different views on how society interacts with itself.

But mob rule must be underpinned by basic freedoms, personal and economic. THose must be nonnegotiable, or your society will slide to the lowest common denominator.