kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
Stop distorting what I said. Semi automatic weapons, hand gun and long gun, should be banned.Yes, for what it's worth, I said semi-automatic weapons and I meant just that. Including hand guns. And after you so kindly reminded me on the importance of using our words carefully, you start flinging around "assault weapons" again? If you don't like Congress's definition, don't use it. I'm sorry you think I'm off the rails, but guns that can deliver 20-30 bullets per minute are not necessary for Joe Citizen. You can't convince me otherwise.I understand that there are many responsible gun owners out there who respect the sanctity of human life and do not misuse their killing machine. I can actually agree that we have a right to choose self protection,
Where did you get that from? Limit gun ownership and ban semiautomatic weapons/replaceable magazines.
I don't get you sometimes you seem reasonable and willing to look at facts and sometimes you are just off the rails.
Look at these facts concerning assault weapons and come back again and tell me how important it is that we ban semi automatic weapons (unless you actually call to ban semi automatic hand guns as well, not just a return of the previous ban.
Gun Facts | Gun Control Facts Concerning Assault Weapons
For a variety of reasons.
The big black scary assault weapon is RARELY used in criminal activity.
But when it is, how many innocent people does it kill?
You want to ban hand guns as well ? LOL
I ask you, for the 12th time in this thread, why do you think banning semi automatic weapons would make them any harder for criminals to get than banning drugs made it harder to get drugs? That is a simple question that of course destroys your entire argument, and that is why you won't address it.
The ONLY thing you would accomplish by banning semi automatic weapons would be to create a black market for semi automatic weapons, ESPECIALLY sine you liberals so stupidly refuse to close the southern border.
and the cops would give theirs up too, right?
And criminals would stop using them too, right?
Why should a lawful person put themselves at a disadvantage?
They have no actual idea how to remove them from the criminals, so next best thing is making sure the criminals are the only ones with guns, right?