ABC Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: ‘Fact-checking’ Was Only Planned for Trump

[M14 Shooter]

ABC News’ Linsey Davis, one of two moderators for last week’s presidential debate, admitted to the Los Angeles Times that the plan was only to fact-check former President Donald Trump, and not Vice President Kamala Harris.

Davis told the Times that ABC had deliberately targeted Trump — and only Trump — because of perceptions that he had been allowed to get away with false statements in the CNN debate against President Joe Biden in late June.

ABC Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: 'Fact-checking' Was Only Planned for Trump

ABC News' Linsey Davis admitted that the plan was only to fact-check Trump, and not Harris, because of perceptions CNN was too nice to him.

www.breitbart.com

But.... there's no bias in the media.
Why did the debate look like 3 against 1? Because it was, and they admit it.

Tell us, in factual, rational, non-partisan terms how it makes sense to only target Trump for fact checking because of the supposedly poor moderation of the prior debate.
Be sure to include the various changes of position Harris exhibited since her elevation to Dem nominee.

 

[WEATHER53]

It was revenge for Joes beat down rather than a debate

 

[Edgetho]

I talked about this last week. Don't know if the thread is still here or not. Don't really care because now, we have solid evidence of what ABC did to rig the debate. Shock

Affidavit Signed by ABC "News" Employee: ABC "News" Agreed In Advance to Not Bring Up Damaging Issues for Kamala, Like Her Knowledge of Biden's Dementia; Linsey Davis Admits They Plotted to "Fact"-Check Only Trump ~​

​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Note that this affidavit was signed before the actual debate, which occurred on September 10. This affidavit is signed September 9, accurately previewing the rigged debate, and he says he enclosed this affidavit in multiple sealed envelopes which he sent through the mail to himself. (Thus establishing the sealed envelopes were in the US mail system as of September 9.)

He says he did this for "future investigatory purposes" -- that is, when Congress investigates, he'll be able to prove he knew that ABC would only "Fact" check Trump before it ever happened.

He's also submitting this to Congress.

Anybody else as totally shocked, just shocked I tell you, as I am??

 

[JoeB131]

The fact checking on Cheeto Hitler should have started the minute he came down the escalator.

 

[Rambunctious]

ABC should have its license taken away.... and no republican should ever go on the air at ABC ever again....

 

[SeaMajor7]

ABC should have its license taken away.... and no republican should ever go on the air at ABC ever again....

They all should be kicked to the curb. All they do is LIE to the American People.

 

[sealybobo]

I talked about this last week. Don't know if the thread is still here or not. Don't really care because now, we have solid evidence of what ABC did to rig the debate. Shock

Affidavit Signed by ABC "News" Employee: ABC "News" Agreed In Advance to Not Bring Up Damaging Issues for Kamala, Like Her Knowledge of Biden's Dementia; Linsey Davis Admits They Plotted to "Fact"-Check Only Trump ~​

​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Note that this affidavit was signed before the actual debate, which occurred on September 10. This affidavit is signed September 9, accurately previewing the rigged debate, and he says he enclosed this affidavit in multiple sealed envelopes which he sent through the mail to himself. (Thus establishing the sealed envelopes were in the US mail system as of September 9.)

He says he did this for "future investigatory purposes" -- that is, when Congress investigates, he'll be able to prove he knew that ABC would only "Fact" check Trump before it ever happened.

He's also submitting this to Congress.

Anybody else as totally shocked, just shocked I tell you, as I am??

Sorry but lots of Republicans filled out lots of bogus affidavits in 2016 so you'll have to give us more evidence than a sworn affidavit for us to believe anything you are saying.

Extraordinary liars need extraordinary proof.

 

[sealybobo]

They all should be kicked to the curb. All they do is LIE to the American People.

Then why would idiot go on that channel and debate?

And why wasn't Trump prepared? All week you guys admitted he didn't prepare. Then Trump complained that Kamala did so well, she must have been fed the answers. HA! No dummy, she prepared.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I talked about this last week. Don't know if the thread is still here or not. Don't really care because now, we have solid evidence of what ABC did to rig the debate. Shock

Affidavit Signed by ABC "News" Employee: ABC "News" Agreed In Advance to Not Bring Up Damaging Issues for Kamala, Like Her Knowledge of Biden's Dementia; Linsey Davis Admits They Plotted to "Fact"-Check Only Trump ~​

​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Note that this affidavit was signed before the actual debate, which occurred on September 10. This affidavit is signed September 9, accurately previewing the rigged debate, and he says he enclosed this affidavit in multiple sealed envelopes which he sent through the mail to himself. (Thus establishing the sealed envelopes were in the US mail system as of September 9.)

He says he did this for "future investigatory purposes" -- that is, when Congress investigates, he'll be able to prove he knew that ABC would only "Fact" check Trump before it ever happened.

He's also submitting this to Congress.

Anybody else as totally shocked, just shocked I tell you, as I am??

Who was the judge that signed off on this?

 

[MisterBeale]

The fact checking on Cheeto Hitler should have started the minute he came down the escalator.

The media should point out the lies of all politicians.

But they don't, not anymore.

And really? They never have.

 

[sealybobo]

I talked about this last week. Don't know if the thread is still here or not. Don't really care because now, we have solid evidence of what ABC did to rig the debate. Shock

Affidavit Signed by ABC "News" Employee: ABC "News" Agreed In Advance to Not Bring Up Damaging Issues for Kamala, Like Her Knowledge of Biden's Dementia; Linsey Davis Admits They Plotted to "Fact"-Check Only Trump ~​

​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Note that this affidavit was signed before the actual debate, which occurred on September 10. This affidavit is signed September 9, accurately previewing the rigged debate, and he says he enclosed this affidavit in multiple sealed envelopes which he sent through the mail to himself. (Thus establishing the sealed envelopes were in the US mail system as of September 9.)

He says he did this for "future investigatory purposes" -- that is, when Congress investigates, he'll be able to prove he knew that ABC would only "Fact" check Trump before it ever happened.

He's also submitting this to Congress.

Anybody else as totally shocked, just shocked I tell you, as I am??

I think this is fake news. No affidavit exists.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Then why would idiot go on that channel and debate?

And why wasn't Trump prepared? All week you guys admitted he didn't prepare. Then Trump complained that Kamala did so well, she must have been fed the answers. HA! No dummy, she prepared.

A full week of memorizing questions and answers is not preparing, it's CHEATING, bobo-clown

 

[MisterBeale]

I talked about this last week. Don't know if the thread is still here or not. Don't really care because now, we have solid evidence of what ABC did to rig the debate. Shock

Affidavit Signed by ABC "News" Employee: ABC "News" Agreed In Advance to Not Bring Up Damaging Issues for Kamala, Like Her Knowledge of Biden's Dementia; Linsey Davis Admits They Plotted to "Fact"-Check Only Trump ~​

​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Note that this affidavit was signed before the actual debate, which occurred on September 10. This affidavit is signed September 9, accurately previewing the rigged debate, and he says he enclosed this affidavit in multiple sealed envelopes which he sent through the mail to himself. (Thus establishing the sealed envelopes were in the US mail system as of September 9.)

He says he did this for "future investigatory purposes" -- that is, when Congress investigates, he'll be able to prove he knew that ABC would only "Fact" check Trump before it ever happened.

He's also submitting this to Congress.

Anybody else as totally shocked, just shocked I tell you, as I am??

I can find no link to this affidavit anywhere.



This is the only thing I have come up with on this story is this;

ABC News Whistleblower in Kamala Harris Debate Question Scandal Dies in Maryland Crash - Bgrnd Search

So, a bombshell revelation has just hit the news cycle that has sent shockwaves through the political world. An ABC News whistleblower who exposed that Kamala

web.archive.org

I can't find a link to the report, anywhere. I suspect this is a hoax TBH.

 

[MisterBeale]

MTG Scrambles to Walk Back Conspiracy for Trump’s Debate Face-Plant​

MTG Scrambles to Walk Back Conspiracy for Trump’s Debate Face-Plant

Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she had posted a made-up claim—but did not take down the original post.

news.yahoo.com

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I can find no link to this affidavit anywhere.

An affidavit is meaningless till it has been signed off by a judge.

Till then it is a meaningless piece of paper

 

[sealybobo]

A full week of memorizing questions and answers is not preparing, it's CHEATING, bobo-clown

No it's not dummy. Trump should have a good answer when asked what is he going to replace Obamacare with. Not "I have a concept of a plan"

Sorry that lying the entire debate didn't work for Trump like it did last time.

This is what happens when you wing it. Sometimes you crush it, like he did against Biden, and sometimes you BOMB like he did against Kamala.

Americans wanted to see if she could COMMAND a stage and she did.

 

[SeaMajor7]

No it's not dummy. Trump should have a good answer when asked what is he going to replace Obamacare with. Not "I have a concept of a plan"

Sorry that lying the entire debate didn't work for Trump like it did last time.

This is what happens when you wing it. Sometimes you crush it, like he did against Biden, and sometimes you BOMB like he did against Kamala.

Americans wanted to see if she could COMMAND a stage and she did.

She was GIVEN QUESTIONS BEFORE THE DEBATE, retard.

 

[sealybobo]

She was GIVEN QUESTIONS BEFORE THE DEBATE, retard.

By whom?

Anyone would know what questions would be asked.

And I don't believe this. Because she would have answered the questions better. Didn't she NOT answer a question that was asked? That wasn't on purpose. In fact independents didn't like it that she didn't answer the question.

Did you know while Kamala was debating against guys dressed like Trump, Trump was not debating or practicing. He was watching 2 aides debate. One played Kamala one played Trump. He just watched.

 

[SeaMajor7]

By whom?

Anyone would know what questions would be asked.

And I don't believe this. Because she would have answered the questions better. Didn't she NOT answer a question that was asked? That wasn't on purpose. In fact independents didn't like it that she didn't answer the question.

Did you know while Kamala was debating against guys dressed like Trump, Trump was not debating or practicing. He was watching 2 aides debate. One played Kamala one played Trump. He just watched.

I'm NOT going down the bobo-clown show rabbit hole.
GFY

 

[sealybobo]

I'm NOT going down the bobo-clown show rabbit hole.
GFY

Court decisions such as Wisconsin v. Right To Life in 2007, Citizens United v. FEC in 2010 and Speechnow v. FEC in 2010 spurred the proliferation of “dark money,” enabling organizations like Americans for Prosperity to legally raise and spend unlimited sums of money through 501(c)(4) nonprofits without having to disclose the original source of funding behind their donors’ network.

One out of every $5 fueling the Americans for Prosperity Action committee comes from unknown sources. Americans for Prosperity’s hybrid PAC has received large donations from Stand Together Chamber of Commerce, a dark money group that is part of the Koch network and gave the hybrid PAC $25 million.