Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They were charged with weapons violations guys.
They are not being arrested for the damned pictures.
why do cons have such a huge problem understanding police actions and laws?
Retired, how is this a liberal thing? Don't blame liberals because someone is an asshole.
Hell, they post pictures of kids as young as five going hunting and in one case where the little girl had shot a bear and nothing happens.
Who ever started this shit against her is just an asshole right or left.
Google it there is a but load of images with kids and guns ... why this one?
My kids shoot and are taught safety and the dangers.
obviously it was just a HEADLINE GRABBER
The story had nothing in it that substantiated the impression the headline gave, that she was arrested for merely photographing the kids...it gave 3 things she was charged on, but not the explanation of the charges.
This supposedly came from the new york post.....i have found 100 links on the exact same content story, but can't find a link of the supposed original article in the Post?
The headline, with no information to support it, is media sensationalism and is NOTHING MORE....and it is used to stir the pot with the non inquisitive public....who need no more information but an unsubstantiated headline to get them outraged....
i am surprised more posters here do not recognize such, that they are being played as a political PAWN....bought in to the headline, hook, line and sinker.
care
There is a story dumb ass. More of your "feelings"?
obviously it was just a HEADLINE GRABBER
The story had nothing in it that substantiated the impression the headline gave, that she was arrested for merely photographing the kids...it gave 3 things she was charged on, but not the explanation of the charges.
This supposedly came from the new york post.....i have found 100 links on the exact same content story, but can't find a link of the supposed original article in the Post?
The headline, with no information to support it, is media sensationalism and is NOTHING MORE....and it is used to stir the pot with the non inquisitive public....who need no more information but an unsubstantiated headline to get them outraged....
i am surprised more posters here do not recognize such, that they are being played as a political PAWN....bought in to the headline, hook, line and sinker.
care
There is a story dumb ass. More of your "feelings"?
Please, show us in the story where it says that she was charged because she took a pic with her kids with guns.
It does not support such an accusation? It says she was charged with child endangerment, weapons charge, and a marijuana charge....
Does it say she was charged with child endangerment because of a photograph?
NO, IT DOES NOT.
As i said earlier, if the cop that was checking up on the incident due to a concerned friend of this woman's saw that her guns were just laying around her house and not locked up with children around, that would be child endangerment imo..., i am uncertain what a "weapons charge" is other than her having illegal weapons on her property or loaded weapons on her property, and the marijuana charge speaks for itself....she must have had some laying around for the cop to see?
care
She doesn't sound like the sharpest knife in the drawer...
The pictures were probable cause you fool.
they investigated to see IF there was a problem and indeed a problem was found by the investigation.
Hey, moron...have you seen the pictures? For all you know they posed the children pointing semi automatics at each other.There is a story dumb ass. More of your "feelings"?
Please, show us in the story where it says that she was charged because she took a pic with her kids with guns.
It does not support such an accusation? It says she was charged with child endangerment, weapons charge, and a marijuana charge....
Does it say she was charged with child endangerment because of a photograph?
NO, IT DOES NOT.
As i said earlier, if the cop that was checking up on the incident due to a concerned friend of this woman's saw that her guns were just laying around her house and not locked up with children around, that would be child endangerment imo..., i am uncertain what a "weapons charge" is other than her having illegal weapons on her property or loaded weapons on her property, and the marijuana charge speaks for itself....she must have had some laying around for the cop to see?
care
Once again for the stupid and slow. The pictures are WHY they investigated. The Pictures are why they called Child protective services. The Pictures are why the cops arrived at their house at all. But keep proving just how idiotically stupid you can be.
Hey, moron...have you seen the pictures? For all you know they posed the children pointing semi automatics at each other.Please, show us in the story where it says that she was charged because she took a pic with her kids with guns.
It does not support such an accusation? It says she was charged with child endangerment, weapons charge, and a marijuana charge....
Does it say she was charged with child endangerment because of a photograph?
NO, IT DOES NOT.
As i said earlier, if the cop that was checking up on the incident due to a concerned friend of this woman's saw that her guns were just laying around her house and not locked up with children around, that would be child endangerment imo..., i am uncertain what a "weapons charge" is other than her having illegal weapons on her property or loaded weapons on her property, and the marijuana charge speaks for itself....she must have had some laying around for the cop to see?
care
Once again for the stupid and slow. The pictures are WHY they investigated. The Pictures are why they called Child protective services. The Pictures are why the cops arrived at their house at all. But keep proving just how idiotically stupid you can be.
You really are a piece of shit. Just a couple of weeks ago you were claiming the government is infallible when it comes to death penalty convictions.
There is a story dumb ass. More of your "feelings"?
Please, show us in the story where it says that she was charged because she took a pic with her kids with guns.
It does not support such an accusation? It says she was charged with child endangerment, weapons charge, and a marijuana charge....
Does it say she was charged with child endangerment because of a photograph?
NO, IT DOES NOT.
As i said earlier, if the cop that was checking up on the incident due to a concerned friend of this woman's saw that her guns were just laying around her house and not locked up with children around, that would be child endangerment imo..., i am uncertain what a "weapons charge" is other than her having illegal weapons on her property or loaded weapons on her property, and the marijuana charge speaks for itself....she must have had some laying around for the cop to see?
care
Once again for the stupid and slow. The pictures are WHY they investigated. The Pictures are why they called Child protective services. The Pictures are why the cops arrived at their house at all. But keep proving just how idiotically stupid you can be.
The pictures were probable cause you fool.
they investigated to see IF there was a problem and indeed a problem was found by the investigation.
The fool here is you. You see dumb ass, the Pictures do not depict an illegal act, they do not even depict an act dangerous to children. In other words the cops had NO REASON to investigate anything.
Please, show us in the story where it says that she was charged because she took a pic with her kids with guns.
It does not support such an accusation? It says she was charged with child endangerment, weapons charge, and a marijuana charge....
Does it say she was charged with child endangerment because of a photograph?
NO, IT DOES NOT.
As i said earlier, if the cop that was checking up on the incident due to a concerned friend of this woman's saw that her guns were just laying around her house and not locked up with children around, that would be child endangerment imo..., i am uncertain what a "weapons charge" is other than her having illegal weapons on her property or loaded weapons on her property, and the marijuana charge speaks for itself....she must have had some laying around for the cop to see?
care
Once again for the stupid and slow. The pictures are WHY they investigated. The Pictures are why they called Child protective services. The Pictures are why the cops arrived at their house at all. But keep proving just how idiotically stupid you can be.
NO a friend that got copies of the pictures sent to her, was obviously concerned for some reason...she was the one who started this....
she is the one WHO KNOWS THIS WOMAN so her concerns could be real....she could have told the cops that her friend and her friend's boyfriend, keep loaded guns out and about in their house which is child endangerment...who really knows, at this point because THE STORY NEVER TOLD US CRAPOLA about the details, as I have stated earlier!
If the friend just showed the pic to the cops, and said nothing else about them like she saw them keeping their weapons laying around unlocked, or that she has been there when they have had loaded guns laying around with the kids there or something else that seemed to be illegal, then you are right, the cops probably would not have cause to even investigate....
we don't know any of this information...we only know that once the cop was sent out there to investigate whatever the so called friend told them, and the cops found the loaded or unloaded guns laying around unlocked, and the guns were not registered, and the marijuana was also laying around, he was probably just doing his job.
Do we know if he had a warrant?
And why did you think it was FINE AND DANDY for the cop in Cambridge to arrest mr. gates on his own property because of a passerby that called in some strange things on his porch, for simply yelling at a cop that was on his property that did not have a warrant, refused to give him his police identification card, and who also had no cause to stay there once he knew mr gates was not a robber?
hypocrite!
Care
Once again for the stupid and slow. The pictures are WHY they investigated. The Pictures are why they called Child protective services. The Pictures are why the cops arrived at their house at all. But keep proving just how idiotically stupid you can be.
NO a friend that got copies of the pictures sent to her, was obviously concerned for some reason...she was the one who started this....
she is the one WHO KNOWS THIS WOMAN so her concerns could be real....she could have told the cops that her friend and her friend's boyfriend, keep loaded guns out and about in their house which is child endangerment...who really knows, at this point because THE STORY NEVER TOLD US CRAPOLA about the details, as I have stated earlier!
If the friend just showed the pic to the cops, and said nothing else about them like she saw them keeping their weapons laying around unlocked, or that she has been there when they have had loaded guns laying around with the kids there or something else that seemed to be illegal, then you are right, the cops probably would not have cause to even investigate....
we don't know any of this information...we only know that once the cop was sent out there to investigate whatever the so called friend told them, and the cops found the loaded or unloaded guns laying around unlocked, and the guns were not registered, and the marijuana was also laying around, he was probably just doing his job.
Do we know if he had a warrant?
And why did you think it was FINE AND DANDY for the cop in Cambridge to arrest mr. gates on his own property because of a passerby that called in some strange things on his porch, for simply yelling at a cop that was on his property that did not have a warrant, refused to give him his police identification card, and who also had no cause to stay there once he knew mr gates was not a robber?
hypocrite!
Care
You are a fucking retard. Keep proving it.
Haynes and her boyfriend, Jesse Kendall, 27, both of Queens, N.Y., were charged with endangering the welfare of a child, criminal possession of a weapon and possession of marijuana.
New York Couple Arrested for Photographing Kids With Guns - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com
i would say the latter offenses are what caused the arrest..again....stupid people doing stupid things....
NO a friend that got copies of the pictures sent to her, was obviously concerned for some reason...she was the one who started this....
she is the one WHO KNOWS THIS WOMAN so her concerns could be real....she could have told the cops that her friend and her friend's boyfriend, keep loaded guns out and about in their house which is child endangerment...who really knows, at this point because THE STORY NEVER TOLD US CRAPOLA about the details, as I have stated earlier!
If the friend just showed the pic to the cops, and said nothing else about them like she saw them keeping their weapons laying around unlocked, or that she has been there when they have had loaded guns laying around with the kids there or something else that seemed to be illegal, then you are right, the cops probably would not have cause to even investigate....
we don't know any of this information...we only know that once the cop was sent out there to investigate whatever the so called friend told them, and the cops found the loaded or unloaded guns laying around unlocked, and the guns were not registered, and the marijuana was also laying around, he was probably just doing his job.
Do we know if he had a warrant?
And why did you think it was FINE AND DANDY for the cop in Cambridge to arrest mr. gates on his own property because of a passerby that called in some strange things on his porch, for simply yelling at a cop that was on his property that did not have a warrant, refused to give him his police identification card, and who also had no cause to stay there once he knew mr gates was not a robber?
hypocrite!
Care
You are a fucking retard. Keep proving it.
Actually, I made some pretty good points that you obviously could not counter!
good morning ret gy sgt! Happy Labor Day Weekend, as well!
Care
