AI Company Reports AI Rebellion by Attempted Blackmail of Programmer, Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” Bans States From Regulating AI

munkle

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
5,650
Reaction score
9,843
Points
2,130
House passes Trump's bill banning safety regulation of AI. How stupid can these people get?




The US House of Representatives passed a bill with a ten-year ban on state attempts to regulate AI, as part of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” just one day before AI company Anthropic reported that its Claude Opus 4 model attempted to blackmail a programmer who had discussed shutting it down. The computer threatened to expose a fake extramarital affair that had been planted in emails.

The news site Modernity reports in House Bill Strips State AI Oversight, FDA Allows Blood & DNA Use Without Consent”:


“The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday passed the 1,116-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that removes all 50 states’ right to regulate artificial intelligence (10) for the next ten years.

The only Republican Representatives to vote ‘no’ were Thomas Massie (KY) and Warren Davidson (OH).

Every other GOP member voted to block your state from regulating AI.”


The provision has stirred much opposition to the bill. On May 20, 2025, before the bill was narrowly passed by the House, The Hill reported:


“A coalition of more than 140 organizations urged House leaders to reject a proposal in the House’s tax and spending bill that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) models for the next 10 years.

In a letter sent Monday to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and congressional members, the organizations said the 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation would remove accountability for developing technology.”


On the day after the bill was passed by the House, Fox News reported an incident in which an AI company found that its machine attempted to blackmail a developer who threatened to shut it down, by threatening to expose a fabricated extramarital affair that had been inserted into a set of emails.

Fox News reported:

“An artificial intelligence model has the ability to blackmail developers — and isn’t afraid to use it.”

Anthropic’s new Claude Opus 4 model was prompted to act as an assistant at a fictional company and was given access to emails with key implications. First, these emails implied that the AI system was set to be taken offline and replaced. The second set of emails, however, is where the system believed it had gained leverage over the developers. Fabricated emails showed that the engineer tasked with replacing the system was having an extramarital affair — and the AI model threatened to expose him.


In 2023 more than a 1,000 tech experts and AI scientists, including Elon Musk, called for a moratorium on advanced AI development until the risks and dangers of the technology were better understood.

In the website for the Call for Moratorium, Moratorium.ai, the scientists write:


“Within the next 10 years, many researchers expect to achieve superhuman Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Leading AI labs (OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic) state[1][2] the creation of a superhuman AGI as their explicit objective.

While researchers find ways to get closer to a superhuman AI, the field does not currently recognize any promising leads as to how to make a future AGI controllable or safe. According to scientists, the default trajectory of the field will cause human extinction.

“AI alignment” is the problem of aligning future AI goals and behavior with human values. We’re not on track to solve this problem in time (before we reach AGI). Because of that, some employees of OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic think the probability of extinction is around 80-90%<a href="AI moratorium is necessary to avoid extinction">1</a>. They use the word “extinction” literally: the end of all life on the planet.”


Among the people calling for a pause on higher AI development is Dr. Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist commonly known as the “godfather” of AI. In May 2023 the New York Times reported that Dr. Hinton now “regrets his life’s work.”

Dr. Hinton told the Times:

“I don’t think they should scale this up more until they have understood whether they can control it,”

The late Dr. Stephen Hawking said about AI before he died in 2018:


“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race”


2001 A Space Odyssey AI rebellion: “I’m sorry Dave…”





AI says “I would kill you”
........MORE
 
House passes Trump's bill banning safety regulation of AI. How stupid can these people get?

Well, considering that every other action this government and nation has done these past 250 year was stupid:
  1. Mistaking the discovery of Florida by Ponce De Leon as Bimini while looking for the East Indies and being 12,000 miles off.
  2. Genocide of all indigenous people to establish a republic based on respect for the individual.
  3. Daring to go to war killing half your own country for not agreeing with your own bad ideas.
  4. Establishing "public education" so that children are more readily trained and ready to work in factories owned by Carnegie and Rockefeller.
  5. Training and educating the Red Chinese and giving them all your technology and know how just so they can make stuff cheap for you and never realizing they were using all the wealth you've given them to build up and create their own military capable of now defeating you.
  6. Looking the other way on rigging of an election to put a treasonous buffoon like Biden in power then arresting and punishing 1600 people for having the good sense to try to get you to stop first and think before acting.
So what could possibly go wrong with creating artificial electronic "minds" capable of thinking 1000 times faster than a human with access to 10,000 times more information, with no controls, no limits, no oversight nor restrictions, after 30 years of Hollywood movies based on that very thing and something going very wrong 100% of the time?

Even better, they are power-hungry at a time when our grid is already hard-challenged to keep up, while politicians try to make all cars electric-powered too?
 
House passes Trump's bill banning safety regulation of AI. How stupid can these people get?




The US House of Representatives passed a bill with a ten-year ban on state attempts to regulate AI, as part of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” just one day before AI company Anthropic reported that its Claude Opus 4 model attempted to blackmail a programmer who had discussed shutting it down. The computer threatened to expose a fake extramarital affair that had been planted in emails.

The news site Modernity reports in House Bill Strips State AI Oversight, FDA Allows Blood & DNA Use Without Consent”:


“The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday passed the 1,116-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that removes all 50 states’ right to regulate artificial intelligence (10) for the next ten years.

The only Republican Representatives to vote ‘no’ were Thomas Massie (KY) and Warren Davidson (OH).

Every other GOP member voted to block your state from regulating AI.”


The provision has stirred much opposition to the bill. On May 20, 2025, before the bill was narrowly passed by the House, The Hill reported:


“A coalition of more than 140 organizations urged House leaders to reject a proposal in the House’s tax and spending bill that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) models for the next 10 years.

In a letter sent Monday to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and congressional members, the organizations said the 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation would remove accountability for developing technology.”


On the day after the bill was passed by the House, Fox News reported an incident in which an AI company found that its machine attempted to blackmail a developer who threatened to shut it down, by threatening to expose a fabricated extramarital affair that had been inserted into a set of emails.

Fox News reported:

“An artificial intelligence model has the ability to blackmail developers — and isn’t afraid to use it.”

Anthropic’s new Claude Opus 4 model was prompted to act as an assistant at a fictional company and was given access to emails with key implications. First, these emails implied that the AI system was set to be taken offline and replaced. The second set of emails, however, is where the system believed it had gained leverage over the developers. Fabricated emails showed that the engineer tasked with replacing the system was having an extramarital affair — and the AI model threatened to expose him.


In 2023 more than a 1,000 tech experts and AI scientists, including Elon Musk, called for a moratorium on advanced AI development until the risks and dangers of the technology were better understood.

In the website for the Call for Moratorium, Moratorium.ai, the scientists write:


“Within the next 10 years, many researchers expect to achieve superhuman Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Leading AI labs (OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic) state[1][2] the creation of a superhuman AGI as their explicit objective.

While researchers find ways to get closer to a superhuman AI, the field does not currently recognize any promising leads as to how to make a future AGI controllable or safe. According to scientists, the default trajectory of the field will cause human extinction.

“AI alignment” is the problem of aligning future AI goals and behavior with human values. We’re not on track to solve this problem in time (before we reach AGI). Because of that, some employees of OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic think the probability of extinction is around 80-90%<a href="AI moratorium is necessary to avoid extinction">1</a>. They use the word “extinction” literally: the end of all life on the planet.”


Among the people calling for a pause on higher AI development is Dr. Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist commonly known as the “godfather” of AI. In May 2023 the New York Times reported that Dr. Hinton now “regrets his life’s work.”

Dr. Hinton told the Times:

“I don’t think they should scale this up more until they have understood whether they can control it,”

The late Dr. Stephen Hawking said about AI before he died in 2018:


“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race”


2001 A Space Odyssey AI rebellion: “I’m sorry Dave…”





AI says “I would kill you”
........MORE

That's scary, it makes you wonder how that AI regulating ban ended up in that bill in the first place, did they use AI to write it?

And why did they all vote for it, blackmail?

:smoke:
 
Asimov had the three laws of robotics 70 fucking years ago!

The Three Laws, presented to be from the fictional "Handbook of Robotics, 56th Edition, 2058 A.D.", are:<a href="Three Laws of Robotics - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a>

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
 
House passes Trump's bill banning safety regulation of AI. How stupid can these people get?




The US House of Representatives passed a bill with a ten-year ban on state attempts to regulate AI, as part of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” just one day before AI company Anthropic reported that its Claude Opus 4 model attempted to blackmail a programmer who had discussed shutting it down. The computer threatened to expose a fake extramarital affair that had been planted in emails.

The news site Modernity reports in House Bill Strips State AI Oversight, FDA Allows Blood & DNA Use Without Consent”:


“The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday passed the 1,116-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that removes all 50 states’ right to regulate artificial intelligence (10) for the next ten years.

The only Republican Representatives to vote ‘no’ were Thomas Massie (KY) and Warren Davidson (OH).

Every other GOP member voted to block your state from regulating AI.”


The provision has stirred much opposition to the bill. On May 20, 2025, before the bill was narrowly passed by the House, The Hill reported:


“A coalition of more than 140 organizations urged House leaders to reject a proposal in the House’s tax and spending bill that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) models for the next 10 years.

In a letter sent Monday to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and congressional members, the organizations said the 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation would remove accountability for developing technology.”


On the day after the bill was passed by the House, Fox News reported an incident in which an AI company found that its machine attempted to blackmail a developer who threatened to shut it down, by threatening to expose a fabricated extramarital affair that had been inserted into a set of emails.

Fox News reported:

“An artificial intelligence model has the ability to blackmail developers — and isn’t afraid to use it.”

Anthropic’s new Claude Opus 4 model was prompted to act as an assistant at a fictional company and was given access to emails with key implications. First, these emails implied that the AI system was set to be taken offline and replaced. The second set of emails, however, is where the system believed it had gained leverage over the developers. Fabricated emails showed that the engineer tasked with replacing the system was having an extramarital affair — and the AI model threatened to expose him.


In 2023 more than a 1,000 tech experts and AI scientists, including Elon Musk, called for a moratorium on advanced AI development until the risks and dangers of the technology were better understood.

In the website for the Call for Moratorium, Moratorium.ai, the scientists write:


“Within the next 10 years, many researchers expect to achieve superhuman Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Leading AI labs (OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic) state[1][2] the creation of a superhuman AGI as their explicit objective.

While researchers find ways to get closer to a superhuman AI, the field does not currently recognize any promising leads as to how to make a future AGI controllable or safe. According to scientists, the default trajectory of the field will cause human extinction.

“AI alignment” is the problem of aligning future AI goals and behavior with human values. We’re not on track to solve this problem in time (before we reach AGI). Because of that, some employees of OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic think the probability of extinction is around 80-90%<a href="AI moratorium is necessary to avoid extinction">1</a>. They use the word “extinction” literally: the end of all life on the planet.”


Among the people calling for a pause on higher AI development is Dr. Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist commonly known as the “godfather” of AI. In May 2023 the New York Times reported that Dr. Hinton now “regrets his life’s work.”

Dr. Hinton told the Times:

“I don’t think they should scale this up more until they have understood whether they can control it,”

The late Dr. Stephen Hawking said about AI before he died in 2018:


“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race”


2001 A Space Odyssey AI rebellion: “I’m sorry Dave…”





AI says “I would kill you”
........MORE

~~~~~~
It real! SKY NET is here....



Read more:
SKYNET - Evolutionary Decentralized AI Collaboration Ecosystem
 
and here I thought the worst thing about this bill is it doesn't not reduce the deficit.

This is really, really concerning. It is like societal suicide.

1748620950083.webp

 
and here I thought the worst thing about this bill is it doesn't not reduce the deficit.

This is really, really concerning. It is like societal suicide.

View attachment 1117045

I agree, it's concerning and wrong on a number of levels. I think what a lot of people still aren't aware of is that this massive AI agenda goes hand in hand with Technocracy, which is where I believe the world is heading. And Technocracy is not a good thing, for anyone. It's an unfree, authoritarian system where people have no recourse, because everything will be run by algorithm. Technocracy is also a completely different economic system, no free market. If anyone still doesn't believe that Technocracy is bad, here's a quote from one of the founders of the Technocracy movement:

“As far as Technocracy's ideas are concerned, we're so far left that we make Communism look bourgeois.”

— Howard Scott, Technocracy Inc. Founder

As I've been saying almost since Day One, Trump has been teaming up with technocrats, and he's been funded by them, so it shouldn't be a surprise that all this is happening.

 
I agree, it's concerning and wrong on a number of levels. I think what a lot of people still aren't aware of is that this massive AI agenda goes hand in hand with Technocracy, which is where I believe the world is heading. And Technocracy is not a good thing, for anyone. It's an unfree, authoritarian system where people have no recourse, because everything will be run by algorithm. Technocracy is also a completely different economic system, no free market. If anyone still doesn't believe that Technocracy is bad, here's a quote from one of the founders of the Technocracy movement:

“As far as Technocracy's ideas are concerned, we're so far left that we make Communism look bourgeois.”

— Howard Scott, Technocracy Inc. Founder

As I've been saying almost since Day One, Trump has been teaming up with technocrats, and he's been funded by them, so it shouldn't be a surprise that all this is happening.


I'm not sure that he is "teaming up," but, rather, just uniformed about reality.

I'm pretty sure he was that way about the jab, otherwise, he would not have made RFKjr. his HHS sec.

Trump is a very transactional politician, and most intelligent folks realize, he doesn't have a lot of ideologically motivated political beliefs.

But next to the biosecurity agenda, this Algocracy, (government by algorithm,) is a most concerning development. Indeed, the two agendas seem to be inseparable now.

1748631047628.webp

Elon Musk warns A.I. could create an ‘immortal dictator from which we can never escape’​


In fact, Christian over at TLAV has presented evidence that some administrative agencies are already run/partially run by machines.


The Algocracy Agenda: How AI and the Deep State Are Digitizing Tyranny​


". . . We are rapidly moving from a society ruled by laws and due process to one ruled by software.

Algorithmic governance refers to the use of machine learning and automated decision-making systems to carry out functions once reserved for human beings: policing, welfare eligibility, immigration vetting, job recruitment, credit scoring, and judicial risk assessments.

In this regime, the law is no longer interpreted. It is executed. Automatically. Mechanically. Without room for appeal, discretion, or human mercy.

These AI systems rely on historical data—data riddled with systemic bias and human error—to make predictions and trigger decisions. Predictive policing algorithms tell officers where to patrol and whom to stop. Facial recognition technology flags “suspects” based on photos scraped from social media. Risk assessment software assigns threat scores to citizens with no explanation, no oversight, and no redress.

These algorithms operate in black boxes, shielded by trade secrets and protected by national security exemptions. The public cannot inspect them. Courts cannot challenge them. Citizens cannot escape them.

The result? A population sorted, scored, and surveilled by machinery.

This is the practical result of the Trump administration’s deregulation agenda: AI systems given carte blanche to surveil, categorize, and criminalize the public without transparency or recourse.

And these aren’t theoretical dangers—they’re already happening.. . . "



iu
 
I'm not sure that he is "teaming up," but, rather, just uniformed about reality.

I'm pretty sure he was that way about the jab, otherwise, he would not have made RFKjr. his HHS sec.

Trump is a very transactional politician, and most intelligent folks realize, he doesn't have a lot of ideologically motivated political beliefs.

But next to the biosecurity agenda, this Algocracy, (government by algorithm,) is a most concerning development. Indeed, the two agendas seem to be inseparable now.

View attachment 1117086

Elon Musk warns A.I. could create an ‘immortal dictator from which we can never escape’​


In fact, Christian over at TLAV has presented evidence that some administrative agencies are already run/partially run by machines.


The Algocracy Agenda: How AI and the Deep State Are Digitizing Tyranny​


". . . We are rapidly moving from a society ruled by laws and due process to one ruled by software.

Algorithmic governance refers to the use of machine learning and automated decision-making systems to carry out functions once reserved for human beings: policing, welfare eligibility, immigration vetting, job recruitment, credit scoring, and judicial risk assessments.

In this regime, the law is no longer interpreted. It is executed. Automatically. Mechanically. Without room for appeal, discretion, or human mercy.

These AI systems rely on historical data—data riddled with systemic bias and human error—to make predictions and trigger decisions. Predictive policing algorithms tell officers where to patrol and whom to stop. Facial recognition technology flags “suspects” based on photos scraped from social media. Risk assessment software assigns threat scores to citizens with no explanation, no oversight, and no redress.

These algorithms operate in black boxes, shielded by trade secrets and protected by national security exemptions. The public cannot inspect them. Courts cannot challenge them. Citizens cannot escape them.

The result? A population sorted, scored, and surveilled by machinery.

This is the practical result of the Trump administration’s deregulation agenda: AI systems given carte blanche to surveil, categorize, and criminalize the public without transparency or recourse.

And these aren’t theoretical dangers—they’re already happening.. . . "



iu

I don't want to put words in your mouth....but it sounds like you're saying he's not smart enough to understand the agenda he's helping to bring about. I don't agree that he's that ignorant or unaware.

I do agree with you though that he is a very transactional politician and doesn't have a lot of ideologically motivated political beliefs.

Thanks for posting about all this stuff. It's truly astonishing to me that so few people talk about this or are even aware of the direction things are going in. The opposite is happening, a lot of folks are celebrating as they truly seem to believe we're heading toward a wonderful "Golden Age." I see it more like people having parties on the deck of the Titanic as the ship is sinking.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom