Aileen Cannon should be disbarred.

[Marener]

that's for people that work for the Govt. Jack didn't, he never had a job, he was illegally appointed from the state.

DoJ hires people all the time. What are you smoking?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The OP "special master" is old news. meh. More berg TDS.

Trump is president, so no one cares what Mr. Smith's report says.

Obviously the T-Rump cares . He tried to stop it . He is easily embarrassed . A thin skinned career criminal . Probably not a good mix.

 

[Oddball]

Obviously the T-Rump cares . He tried to stop it . He is easily embarrassed . A thin skinned career criminal . Probably not a good mix.

 

[struth]

DoJ hires people all the time. What are you smoking?

Sure and if they are US Attorneys or Special Prosecutors, acting as US Attorneys they still have to get confirmed by the Senate.

Why are you so ignorant to the law and the US Constitution?

 

[Marener]

Sure and if they are US Attorneys or Special Prosecutors, acting as US Attorneys they still have to get confirmed by the Senate.

Why are you so ignorant to the law and the US Constitution?

Doesn’t change the fact that he was hired by the DoJ and enjoys qualified immunity.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Read the law, I provided a link.

Usually they don't, but Jack's appointed violated the law

I've provided links also. The United States Constitution and 28 USC 543.

WW

 

[struth]

Doesn’t change the fact that he was hired by the DoJ and enjoys qualified immunity.

Hired illegally, and thus never really hired.

QI only protect Govt employees from civil liability when they are acting within their jobs.

1) not criminal
and 2) Govt employees, and 3) acting within their job.

He was illegally hired, he wasn't a govt employee and certainly not acting within his job, since he didn't have one. ....and moreover not from criminal liablity 18 U.S.C. § 242, comes to mind right away

 

[Robert W]

Correct Cohen paid her. So how could she have extorted Trump if Cohen paid her?

Let's try again. She extorted Cohen. She sold him her story and would you want others to sell your story only to find you paid for it?

 

[struth]

I've provided links also. The United States Constitution and 28 USC 543.

WW

Yeah, nobody said that the DOJ can't appointed special counsel.

You apparently don't understand the US Constitution....https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-2/section-2/clause-2/

It requires the US Senate to give advice and consent, which has to be done for US Attorneys. Garland can't appoint anyone to simply act as a US Attorney, by calling them a Special Counsel...like he did with Jack, that was illegal. I provided law, which is the Court's ruling on the matter.

 

[justoffal]

Yes. I mentioned it as evidence of her legally incorrect ruling. Not only is she incompetent, she's overtly biased and needs to be removed from the federal bench.

She will be the next SCOTUS selection.
Bias?...nah.... Smith never had proper legal standing to begin with so it doesn't matter how she rules on his motions.

Bias is what you see when you look at Merchan who will himself be facing charges very soon.

 

[Marener]

Hired illegally, and thus never really hired.

Nope. DoJ can hire whoever they want.

 

[struth]

Nope. DoJ can hire whoever they want.

No they can't.....geez man, US Attorneys, or those acting like US Attorneys have to get confirmed by the US Senate.

You are really dumb

 

[WorldWatcher]

Let's try again. She extorted Cohen. She sold him her story and would you want others to sell your story only to find you paid for it?

She didn't extort anyone.

She went to the MEDIA first to sell here story. The Trump campaign went to her. That is not extortion.

WW

 

[Robert W]

She didn't extort anyone.

She went to the MEDIA first to sell here story. The Trump campaign went to her. That is not extortion.

WW

Trump is not guilty of breaking that law. Matter of fact, what law?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yeah, nobody said that the DOJ can't appointed special counsel.

You apparently don't understand the US Constitution....https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-2/section-2/clause-2/

It requires the US Senate to give advice and consent, which has to be done for US Attorneys. Garland can't appoint anyone to simply act as a US Attorney, by calling them a Special Counsel...like he did with Jack, that was illegal. I provided law, which is the Court's ruling on the matter.

Actually what the Constittuion says is that Congress can authorize Department Heads to hire inferior officers.

Special Prosecutors are not US Attorney's. They are an inferior officer.

Congress in 28 USC 543 authorized the Attorney General to hire attorney's.

WW

 

[Nostra]

Because you can’t criminally prosecute a sitting president.

The case can be refiled once he leaves office.

So you are good with the DOJ charging Biden for stealing top secret documents, right?

 

[Marener]

No they can't.....geez man, US Attorneys, or those acting like US Attorneys have to get confirmed by the US Senate.

You are really dumb

Okay. So he’s not a US Attorney. But he still works for the DoJ.

 

[Nostra]

Nothing more corrupt than pardoning the cronies who violated the law to protect you.

Like Hunter?

 

[justoffal]

No they can't.....geez man, US Attorneys, or those acting like US Attorneys have to get confirmed by the US Senate.

You are really dumb

He was never officially vetted as Cannon pointed out dozens of times...her superiors are just scared little pussies. It's alright ...she will soon be their boss.

 

[Nostra]

Yes.



Trump has no existing charges to pardon himself for. The two federal cases were dismissed.

WW

So?