Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
Everyone just watched you run from debate. You literally have no answer. Weird for someone debating abortion so frequently. I am getting used to shutting you down.The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
See if you notice the similarity with you....
If The Democrats Admitted To Worshiping Satan...
....I bet you'd still be voting for them. I have authored several threads identifying the alignment of said party with the Prince of Darkness....and I bet most though it was innuendo and hyperbole..... If you did......check this out, via the Huffington Post: 1. "The Death Of Justice Ruth...www.usmessageboard.com
The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
A miscarry is much different that a woman making the decision that she she is going to kill her unborn child because the child will be too much trouble for her to deal with.
96% of all the abortions are for that reason and it is despicable.
Hopefully Amy and the other Conservatives on the Court will do the right thing and do away with the immoral practice of abortion on demand for the sake of convenience.
Killing children is not cool. Liberals are scumbags thinking it is.
So you’re saying a miscarry is a dead child? Or are you saying the manner in which a embryo stops growing determines whether it is a person? Are all those miscarries (1/2 of all pregnancies) all dead kids?The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
A miscarry is much different that a woman making the decision that she she is going to kill her unborn child because the child will be too much trouble for her to deal with.
96% of all the abortions are for that reason and it is despicable.
Hopefully Amy and the other Conservatives on the Court will do the right thing and do away with the immoral practice of abortion on demand for the sake of convenience.
Killing children is not cool. Liberals are scumbags thinking it is.
So you’re saying a miscarry is a dead child? Or are you saying the manner in which a embryo stops growing determines whether it is a person? Are all those miscarries (1/2 of all pregnancies) all dead kids?The truth? The truth is I flushed some cells from my wife’s body which did not result in killing any babies. You can’t reconcile the dilemma so you are running. It’s apparent and everyone sees it. No amount of hogwash can combat the simple fact that 50% of all pregnancies are miscarried. My wife miscarried twice. There are no lost souls from a miscarry or abortion.Much like a computer in a loop you cannot reconcile an abortion with a miscarry. They end up with the same result. And in neither do you have a dead person. In fact I’ve seen two as I have explained and neither was the end of a life but instead, the lack of becoming a life. It is therefore irrational to ignore the inability to reconcile those facts.Keep lying to yourself.
That's what allows the easily led, you, to vote for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.
One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be
There are studies that 50% of all pregnancies miscarry... 20% of known plus a whole lot of pregnancies that miscarries before being known. That’s a lot of DEAD BABIES.
You didn't bring up miscarry until I revealed that you were lying about the unborn being 'their body.'
Are you ready to admit the truth?
A miscarry is much different that a woman making the decision that she she is going to kill her unborn child because the child will be too much trouble for her to deal with.
96% of all the abortions are for that reason and it is despicable.
Hopefully Amy and the other Conservatives on the Court will do the right thing and do away with the immoral practice of abortion on demand for the sake of convenience.
Killing children is not cool. Liberals are scumbags thinking it is.
That's not her stance. She is pledging to properly interpret the law and constitution, as written. Are you asking her to pledge to apply the 14th amendment to the unborn?1. The following was Barrett's response when asked about anti-religion bigotry.
"...I think when you step back and you think about the debate about whether someone’s religion has any bearing on their fitness for office, it seems to me that the premise of the question is that people of faith would have a uniquely difficult time separating out their moral commitments from their obligation to apply the law. And I think people of faith should reject that premise,” she added.
“All people, of course– well, we hope, most people– have deeply held moral convictions, whether or not they come from faith. People who have no faith, people who are not religious, have deeply held moral convictions,” Barrett noted. “And it’s just as important for those people to be sure– I just spent time talking about the job of a judge being to set aside moral convictions, personal moral convictions, and personal preferences, and follow the law. That’s a challenge for those of faith and for those who have no faith.”
2. She said the above in the context of "whether someone is Catholic or Jewish or Evangelical or Muslim or has no faith at all is irrelevant to the job,” Barrett added."
But that view ignores an element that has been removed from the views of our founders, a view that made America as exceptional as it once was: the sanctity of human life.
3. And it fails to mention a particular faith, one that abounds with a blood-lust above all else: Militant Secularism.
In all of its denominations, Militant Secularism is far, far from what is meant by 'morality.'
None of that religion have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They serve a power many millennia old, once believed banished from Western Civilization, but, today, making a strong and virulent come-back.
It was put, succinctly, by Leon Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
4. Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.
5. Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
If we must have judges, they should never be the sort who ignore government inspired slaughter of our fellow human beings.
1. The following was Barrett's response when asked about anti-religion bigotry.
"...I think when you step back and you think about the debate about whether someone’s religion has any bearing on their fitness for office, it seems to me that the premise of the question is that people of faith would have a uniquely difficult time separating out their moral commitments from their obligation to apply the law. And I think people of faith should reject that premise,” she added.
“All people, of course– well, we hope, most people– have deeply held moral convictions, whether or not they come from faith. People who have no faith, people who are not religious, have deeply held moral convictions,” Barrett noted. “And it’s just as important for those people to be sure– I just spent time talking about the job of a judge being to set aside moral convictions, personal moral convictions, and personal preferences, and follow the law. That’s a challenge for those of faith and for those who have no faith.”
2. She said the above in the context of "whether someone is Catholic or Jewish or Evangelical or Muslim or has no faith at all is irrelevant to the job,” Barrett added."
But that view ignores an element that has been removed from the view of our founders, a view that made America as exceptional as it once was: the sanctity of human life.
3. And it fails to mention a particular faith, one that abounds with a blood-lust above all else: Militant Secularism.
In all of its denominations, Militant Secularism is far, far from what is meant by 'morality.'
None of that religion have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They serve a power many millennia old, once believed banished from Western Civilization, but, today, making a strong and virulent come-back.
It was put, succinctly, by Leon Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
4. Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.
5. Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
If we must have judges, they should never be the sort who ignore government inspired slaughter of our fellow human beings.
The human mind cannot operate endlessly or even perhaps briefly in a state of antiseptic clinical objectivity. Of course one's own deepest held moral beliefs and conscience will and must influence decisions both great and small, private and professional. I believe Barrett and most everyone else, for that matter, fully understand this inescapable aspect of the human condition. Hence the uproar from both sides of the aisle. Then again, perhaps she's a reptile in human flesh, a cold-blooded machine mind awaiting her chance at fame and glory. I suppose we'll find out soon enough.
