Pksimon2007
Member
- May 2, 2015
- 427
- 30
- 16
I just don't think this prize can be cheapened any more than it already has.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
I have mixed feelings about Krugman ... while I certainly like his point of view, I strongly disagree with him regarding the peril of debt and the effects of QE. I personally prefer Joseph Stiglitz , he is more carefull with his research.
Paul Krugman on Asset bubbles caused by QE4
"Two things. We don’t know that. Asset bubbles have happened even without not-so-easy money. And, in a depressed economy, where alternative uses of money are not great, people are going to bid up the prices of profitable corporations and stuff like that. So it’s not clear."
Why Paul Krugman thinks inflation fears are baloney
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
Stiglitz has a place much closer to my heart.
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? "
Stiglitz has a place much closer to my heart.
he's a typical liberal who wants to tax and spend, and tax and spend! He and Krugman are socialist buds who see themselves as very similar.
Stiglitz has a place much closer to my heart.
he's a typical liberal who wants to tax and spend, and tax and spend! He and Krugman are socialist buds who see themselves as very similar.
- You really only have one note you can play, don't you?
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? "
simple, way too much liberal distorting interference. For example, without Obamacare and the other libcommie interventions health care would cost 20% of what it does today.
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
100% stupid and liberal !! how can you have more lib commie interventions than we have? The NHS is a very efficient socialist bureaucracy. We have a huge spaghetti mess. Please think before you post!!"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? "
simple, way too much liberal distorting interference. For example, without Obamacare and the other libcommie interventions health care would cost 20% of what it does today.
- Oddly, in countries with even more "libcommie interventions", healthcare is cheaper.
He describes himself as neo-Keynesian macroeconomist. Also, classical. Pre-Austrian."uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
I think PK would, at this point, pull out a graph and show you that really, debt is just money we owe ourselves. Since it's ours, we can pay ourselves back at any time."uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
I have mixed feelings about Krugman ... while I certainly like his point of view, I strongly disagree with him regarding the peril of debt and the effects of QE. I personally prefer Joseph Stiglitz , he is more carefull with his research.
Paul Krugman on Asset bubbles caused by QE4
"Two things. We don’t know that. Asset bubbles have happened even without not-so-easy money. And, in a depressed economy, where alternative uses of money are not great, people are going to bid up the prices of profitable corporations and stuff like that. So it’s not clear."
Why Paul Krugman thinks inflation fears are baloney
Yep - tax the rich hard and spend it to build the middle class to the point where they can support a booming economy again. I don't see a problem with that. The rich will get richer despite taxation. They won't if the middle class is diminished much more.Stiglitz has a place much closer to my heart.
he's a typical liberal who wants to tax and spend, and tax and spend! He and Krugman are socialist buds who see themselves as very similar.
"uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
no dear they just didn't want to get involved in partisan politics. They have to act above it to preserve
their elite reputations.
Do you understand??
I think PK would, at this point, pull out a graph and show you that really, debt is just money we owe ourselves. Since it's ours, we can pay ourselves back at any time."uh, so what's happening with the US economy? Er, that would take a lot of research to know, and we haven't done any actual research. We're just here for the swag bag."
So they get the prize for their work on how to measure the economy, and fail to answer the question of what's wrong with it. That wasn't a stupid response, in context that was just a stupid question. Everyone knows that if you really want to know what's wrong with the economy you just ask Paul Krugman.
- Ah. So you've heard of Krugman? What kind of economist is he?
I have mixed feelings about Krugman ... while I certainly like his point of view, I strongly disagree with him regarding the peril of debt and the effects of QE. I personally prefer Joseph Stiglitz , he is more carefull with his research.
Paul Krugman on Asset bubbles caused by QE4
"Two things. We don’t know that. Asset bubbles have happened even without not-so-easy money. And, in a depressed economy, where alternative uses of money are not great, people are going to bid up the prices of profitable corporations and stuff like that. So it’s not clear."
Why Paul Krugman thinks inflation fears are baloney
And just what have the effects of QE been? An economic recovery? Why is that a bad thing (assuming, of course, that your goal would have been a recovery).
Yep - tax the rich hard and spend it to build the middle class to the point where they can support a booming economy again. I don't see a problem with that. The rich will get richer despite taxation. They won't if the middle class is diminished much more.Stiglitz has a place much closer to my heart.
he's a typical liberal who wants to tax and spend, and tax and spend! He and Krugman are socialist buds who see themselves as very similar.