Republicans For Harris Might Be In A Tough Spot

[IM2]

Look at those assumptions you made. Do you even realize it? Do you think you have special powers?

For example, I've said many times that inflation was not Biden's fault. But no, you want to just attack out of ignorance. Just like the Trumpsters. This is why I don't burn much energy trying to engage the wings here any more. It's pointless, since you'll all just put words in my mouth anyway.

I'm not in charge of picking candidates, so I don't think about "better" ones. But I do have priorities and I do have characteristics that I look for. Harris/Walz is too far left for me, since they both support and advance things that I don't like. But I still may vote for them anyway, only because Trumpism represents a unique, clear and present danger.

You see the Left on one side of the fence, and the Right on the other. What I see is the wingers from both ends on one side of the fence and the rest of the country on the other. And none of your personal attacks are going to change that. Sorry.

The biggest assumption is that both sides are bad. Looking at the facts that's not so. Where is Harris and Walz too far left? What do you consider too far left? You are part of the wings Mac but you can't see it. What are these things that Harris and Walz advance that you don't like since I assume so much? And you are the one who says you aren't being represented so asking you who would you find that is better is a fair question. But you can't answer it. I find it funny what people think is far left. And I find it sad that people try equating thatto the literal fascism coming from the right.

You are blind yet you think you see something. It's real easy to sit on your ass criticizing both sides. But what doesn't seem so easy is for those who do, to articulate a position that would actually be better. What I see are three sides, three wings so to speak. One side is trying to do things that meet our modern reality and to allow freedom even of its alowing people to be free to do some things a lot of use don't do because they do no one any harm. Another side is those who imagine a nation that never existed and want to force the country into believing what they imagine is true. Then we have the wishy washys who aren't satisified with anything, have zero answers, but they do know that everybody else is wrong except them.

 

[Mac1958]

The biggest assumption is that both sides are bad. Looking at the facts that's not so. Where is Harris and Walz too far left? What do you consider too far left? You are part of the wings Mac but you can't see it. What are these things that Harris and Walz advance that you don't like since I assume so much? And you are the one who says you aren't being represented so asking you who would you find that is better is a fair question. But you can't answer it. I find it funny what people think is far left. And I find it sad that people try equating thatto the literal fascism coming from the right.

You are blind yet you think you see something. It's real easy to sit on your ass criticizing both sides. But what doesn't seem so easy is for those who do, to articulate a position that would actually be better. What I see are three sides, three wings so to speak. One side is trying to do things that meet our modern reality and to allow freedom even of its alowing people to be free to do some things a lot of use don't do because they do no one any harm. Another side is those who imagine a nation that never existed and want to force the country into believing what they imagine is true. Then we have the wishy washys who aren't satisified with anything, have zero answers, but they do know that everybody else is wrong except them.

And you do it again. I've never said "both sides are bad". Both ends are human, and both ends share many counterproductive behaviors. The ends have different priorities. Obviously.

I don't know how many times you need to have this conversation. I think the Left played a big role in animating Trumpism with their PC and Identity Politics, and we've gone over that multiple times. And I'm saying that the Right is animating the Left with its malinformed, paranoid caveman politics. The two things can exist simultaneously.

For the zillionth time, and I'll make this as clear as I can: I think that the best and longest-lasting solutions come from communication, collaboration, and innovation. That requires input and ideas from across the political spectrum, and NOT from one narcissistic tribe dictating for the rest of the country. This way we all have skin in the game.

This, as opposed to now, where each tribe thinks it has to "beat" the other. The other tribe has to be "the enemy". It doesn't work. And I can point at the results to back me up.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Also known as Cum Allah, Que Mala, or Kalamalalala.

Wow, you all really have had no home training at all have you?

Malaka(s) is a versatile word following some rules: When referring to someone you hate, “Malaka” means “jerk“, “asshole” or “motherfucker”, while when describing someone you want to despise, it translates to “wanker“, “idiot” “stupid” or similar terms.​

 

[gtopa1]

Who is Malaka?

It's Greek. Look it up!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

What is my type, exactly?

Malakas.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

She doesn't know how to pronounce her own name and will take on any identity necessary to win. Therefore:

Kamala
Lamaka
Malaka


Makes no difference

True that!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

This is stupid. I am tired of you both sides are bad people types. Name a candidate that presents a better plan than Harris. You guys bitched because Biden was too old, now there is a younger candidate and you still aren't satisfied. Name a candidate out there right now who you think is better.

Trump!!!!



Greg

 

[rampart]

So, I started keeping a record of those who are supporting Harris.

She's a moron and a socialist (open borders, universal health care, anti police).

And those GOPer's who support her are really anti-cop.

What happens now that they have a certified whack job as a VP choice.

I can't thank her enough. I thought she'd pick someone who might dampen out her pathetic record and articlulate a great message.

But she just gifted us something very special.....a reason to fight.

I was a little burned out on Trump, but now it's about keeping her (and more particularly him) out of the WH.

So where does this leave people like Christine Todd Whitman. Someone who still calls herself a Republican and yet supports Harris. Is she really going to get behind him ? If so, she's outed as being a true turncoat. As are others if they do the same.

ms harris, the infinitely more qualified candidate for president (having never been a failed president or a failed businessman nor a convicted felon, nor ever having classified documents out of school, nor ever led an angry lynch mob ). ms harris has also been elected to several responsible positions and actually received a majority of the votes in all (rather than none) of her elections.

you had best get to liking these "rinos" and never trumpers. they are the guys who will be rebuilding your party next year.

 

[August West]

You going to support Harris/Walz as a never Trumper ?

Are you going to stay awake all night, pouting?

 

[FA_Q2]

lol, no. Republicans supporting the dems this go around are not in a 'tight' spot no matter what Harris does or who she picked for her VP. They are not 'supporting' the dems but excising the cancer that Trumpsters represent.

If Trump losses again it is going to be the republicans period that are in a tight spot as they lose all political relevance. It is not as though you are going to change, it will be another 4 years of trumpsters bitching and moaning about stolen elections no matter how much power they lose and no matter how much pure destruction they do to the party.

The real question is if there will even be a Republican party if they suffer a 2024 loss. We may be witnessing the fall of an entire political party and the rise of a new one. And that also means democrats are going to enjoy complete political power for awhile.