Another Educational Failure

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,092
2,250
Sin City
DC Schools: $29,349 Per Pupil, 83 Percent Not Proficient in Reading

May 14, 2014, By Terence P. Jeffrey

The public schools in Washington, D.C., spent $29,349 per pupil in the 2010-2011 school year, according to the latest data from National Center for Education Statistics, but in 2013 fully 83 percent of the eighth graders in these schools were not "proficient" in reading and 81 percent were not "proficient" in math.

So, what on earth are they being taught? The article @ DC Schools: $29,349 Per Pupil, 83% Not Proficient in Reading | CNS News doesn't say
 
Obviously, they are being taught that regardless of how recklessly they live, the Gub'mint will provide.
 
it'd be tough to argue that that money is being well spent.

but if you're a parent, and your 8th grader can't read or do math at their grade level, YOU are the problem, not the school.
 
D.C. proving once again that there is no correlation between the amount of money spent on education and the end result.
 
Is that amount the amount spent on the pupils or the amount the district gets per pupil?
 
D.C. proving once again that there is no correlation between the amount of money spent on education and the end result.

actually, that's not the case.

at best you can say that high levels of spending does not guarantee results. but to claim there is no correlation? that's just ridiculous. teaching and learning without resources can be extremely difficult.

but i will agree that at some point money is not the limiting factor. i don't know how a school can replace or replicate the benefits of an involved, caring person, but until they figure that out kids are going to fall behind.
 
Last edited:
WAY TO SPIN THIS in the NEGATIVE, op!:eusa_clap:

Washington Dc's school district in 2013 IMPROVED MORE THAN any other school district in the USA!

Yes, their overall scores are still lower than other highly populated cities, but not by much...which is a sad state of affairs for most all inner city schools...

But they DID improve greatly, by over 25 points on their overall score...and they made lots of changes that are making them head in the right direction...ie. they removed the basic tenure for teachers and some other incentives added etc etc....

D.C. Public Schools posted larger gains on 2013 national math and reading tests than any other major urban school system, but the District’s performance continues to trail the large-city average, according to a federal study released Wednesday. The D.C. Public Schools (DCPS) system also continues to have the nation’s widest achievement gaps between white and black students and white and Hispanic students, according to the study, which shows that poor black children in the District continue to score lower, on average, than their counterparts in other cities.

(The Washington Post/Source: National Center for Education Studies) - D.C. Public School fourth-graders improved in both math and reading since 2011, but average scores lag behind other large urban school systems.




The study is based on the 2013 National Assessment of Educational Progress, math and reading tests that are administered every other year to a representative sample of fourth- and eighth-graders across the country.



The District’s gains — which reflect only the performance of traditional schools, excluding charter schools — come amid a period of rapid change that has made the city a nationally watched experiment in improving urban schools. Public preschool is now available to all children; the city has adopted new academic standards; demographics have shifted; and the traditional school system has gotten rid of teacher tenure, instituting evaluations that tie job security and pay to student test scores.


It’s difficult to say exactly how those different factors have contributed to the city’s gains, but Chancellor Kaya Henderson said the growth is evidence that the school system’s key policies are the right ones.

Despite D.C. public school gains, system trails behind large-city average - The Washington Post
 
D.C. proving once again that there is no correlation between the amount of money spent on education and the end result.

actually, that's not the case.

at best you can say that high levels of spending does not guarantee results. but to claim there is no correlation? that's just ridiculous. teaching and learning without resources can be extremely difficult.

but i will agree that at some point money is not the limiting factor. i don't know how a school can replace or replicate the benefits of an involved, caring person, but until they figure that out kids are going to fall behind.

Urban school districts tend to spend the most money per student while having the lowest levels of achievement. D.C's spending is obscene. You could send all of those kids to a top notch prep school for what they're spending.
 
DC Schools: $29,349 Per Pupil, 83 Percent Not Proficient in Reading

May 14, 2014, By Terence P. Jeffrey

The public schools in Washington, D.C., spent $29,349 per pupil in the 2010-2011 school year, according to the latest data from National Center for Education Statistics, but in 2013 fully 83 percent of the eighth graders in these schools were not "proficient" in reading and 81 percent were not "proficient" in math.

So, what on earth are they being taught? The article @ DC Schools: $29,349 Per Pupil, 83% Not Proficient in Reading | CNS News doesn't say

If only 17% of eighth graders can read a freaking book in Washington D.C. it makes you wonder how many D.C. grammar school teachers are literate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top