Antisemitic Far-Left Muslim Congresswoman refuses to condemn the murder of two innocent Jews

Why, for not being more upset about two people being killed than 50,000.

Violence begets violence.

The question is, tragic as this couple is, how are their lives more valuable than women and children being slaughtered in Gaza?
.the reason women and children are dying in Gaza is because hamas is putting them in harms way.

Your answer would be to let hamas slaughter Israelis, and then be content to demand that Israel do nothing in response because hamas decided to put their militzry operations in a hospital or a daycare.

Israel is even giving them advanced warning to evacuate because that location will be bombed. What do you think the Israel response SHOULD have been?
 
Omar was asked by a reporter for a comment about the cold-blooded murder of two innocent young Jews right here in Washington DC - and the anti-American, antisemitic Muslim REFUSED to answer.

Couldn’t she have said something like “the taking of innocent lives is always wrong” or “violence is never the answer”? Nope. She just snubbed her nose at the reporter and got into her cab.

(at least she didn’t say “so big deal….someone did something.”)



You would have thought when she referred to 9/11 as "some people did something" that would have been something the left would have condemned, but nope, they really didnt say much about it at all.
 
Is it ok to go out and murder a Muslim couple because of Oct 7th? you wanna hear someone say, 2 lives is nothing compared to 1,200 murdered Jews?
One has nothing to do with the other in both cases.
Oh good gosh no man, if this had been a Jewish person murdering a Muslim couple, the left would have been rioting in the streets!!
 
.the reason women and children are dying in Gaza is because hamas is putting them in harms way.

Your answer would be to let hamas slaughter Israelis, and then be content to demand that Israel do nothing in response because hamas decided to put their militzry operations in a hospital or a daycare.

Israel is even giving them advanced warning to evacuate because that location will be bombed. What do you think the Israel response SHOULD have been?

Their response should not have been a year and a half of terrorizing the civilian population.

The Zionists are the ones who've crowded 2 million people into a narrow strip of land smaller than Chicago.

The whole "Whoops, We blew up that Hospital by mistake" is laughable.

"Whoops, we ran over Rachel Corey with a bulldozer"

"Whoops, we let a Christian Militia slaughter refugees in Lebanon"

"Whoops, we bombed the USS Liberty. Three Times. By accident. No really!"
 
The only oops is Sharon should have killed Arafat when he was given the chance. Sharon later admitted that it was a mistake not to kill Arafat

When I was in college and could stand to be in the same room with the Zionist student group Hillel, They often said the reason they didn't kill Arafat was their biggest worry was he'd be replaced with a well-spoken, Western educated guy who could advocate for Palestine of TV.

(On some level, they really do understand what they are doing is wrong.)
 
When I was in college and could stand to be in the same room with the Zionist student group Hillel, They often said the reason they didn't kill Arafat was their biggest worry was he'd be replaced with a well-spoken, Western educated guy who could advocate for Palestine of TV.

(On some level, they really do understand what they are doing is wrong.)
I am sure Hillel could not stand to be in the same room with you. The Israelis deserve to be safe. The Palestinians deserve to be deported. There is plenty of room for them in the Arab world if anyone wants them, I certainly don't want them in the United States.

Jews are the most accomplished 0.2% in the world. What is in their interest is always right.
 
Omar was asked by a reporter for a comment about the cold-blooded murder of two innocent young Jews right here in Washington DC - and the anti-American, antisemitic Muslim REFUSED to answer.

Couldn’t she have said something like “the taking of innocent lives is always wrong” or “violence is never the answer”? Nope. She just snubbed her nose at the reporter and got into her cab.

(at least she didn’t say “so big deal….someone did something.”)


I have been struck by the difference in tone to the killing of these two and the mass genocide taking place every day in Gaza.
As Israel tells us every day there are no innocant parties in this war. In this sick world they are legit targets. Just like Palestinian infants,
 
I have been struck by the difference in tone to the killing of these two and the mass genocide taking place every day in Gaza.
As Israel tells us every day there are no innocant parties in this war. In this sick world they are legit targets. Just like Palestinian infants,
“Genocide.”

You’ve given away your antisemitism. Discussion closed.
 
Why is the freedom of a violent illegal alien gang member wife-beater more important than an American Jewish hostage being starved to death and tortured by Muslim savages?
 
I have been struck by the difference in tone to the killing of these two and the mass genocide taking place every day in Gaza.
As Israel tells us every day there are no innocant parties in this war. In this sick world they are legit targets. Just like Palestinian infants,
I care about the Jews. The only Palestinians I care about are Christian Palestinians. The Jews will benefit when all the non-Christian Palestinians are deported.
 
I am sure Hillel could not stand to be in the same room with you. The Israelis deserve to be safe.
Then they shouldn't steal someone else's land.

Maybe when they move somewhere, they shouldn't piss off the people they live with. Something they've done since the Romans to the Present day.

The Palestinians deserve to be deported.
Why? It's their land.
There is plenty of room for them in the Arab world if anyone wants them, I certainly don't want them in the United States.

Too bad. You can't displace a people and then whine when some of them show up in your lily-white neighborhood.

Jews are the most accomplished 0.2% in the world. What is in their interest is always right.

Yet no one really wants them, for some reason.

If the US was serious about peace in the Middle East and protecting the Jews, a simple enough solution. Let's just give them one of our states to be the new Jewish homeland. Florida might be a good pick. We can just forcibly displace all the white Christians living there now, no problem.

Why is the freedom of a violent illegal alien gang member wife-beater more important than an American Jewish hostage being starved to death and tortured by Muslim savages?

Well, besides the fact that he isn't a gang member, and a single domestic violence call doesn't make him a wife-beater, the Jewish Hostage chose to go to an active war zone.

You pays your money and you takes your chances.
 
I care about the Jews. The only Palestinians I care about are Christian Palestinians. The Jews will benefit when all the non-Christian Palestinians are deported.

Not going to happen.

Your wank fantasy about genocide aside, the best solution at some point would be a Two-State solution with a FAIR division of the land. Neither side will go for that, of course, but that would be the most equitable solution.
 
I care about the Jews. The only Palestinians I care about are Christian Palestinians. The Jews will benefit when all the non-Christian Palestinians are deported.
The people in Gaza are actually Egyptians - as they are on land that was Egypt before it launched an attack against Israel in an effort to destroy it, and of course lost. Thus, considering Egypt stole the land, homes, and all assets of all the Jews living in Egypt when they expelled them, Egypt should take back the Gazans and Israel take over that land.
 
The people in Gaza are actually Egyptians - as they are on land that was Egypt before it launched an attack against Israel in an effort to destroy it, and of course lost. Thus, considering Egypt stole the land, homes, and all assets of all the Jews living in Egypt when they expelled them, Egypt should take back the Gazans and Israel take over that land.
Except Egypt didn't expel its Jews until 1958, after Israel conspired with France and the UK to steal the Suez Canal from Egypt.

But you leave that part out.
 
Their response should not have been a year and a half of terrorizing the civilian population.

The Zionists are the ones who've crowded 2 million people into a narrow strip of land smaller than Chicago.

The whole "Whoops, We blew up that Hospital by mistake" is laughable.

"Whoops, we ran over Rachel Corey with a bulldozer"

"Whoops, we let a Christian Militia slaughter refugees in Lebanon"

"Whoops, we bombed the USS Liberty. Three Times. By accident. No really!"

And still you put zero blame on hamas for putting military equipment in population centers, in hospitals, in schools.

Israel isn't trying to kill civilians, they are trying to destroy hamas and their artillery, but hamas put that artillery in horrible places. Israel warns people before they are going to bomb an area. Hamas attacked Israel, Israel is making a response, not against the citizens but against hamas, who is putting their citizens in harms way, and yet you still blame Israel.

Again, what SHOULD have been Israel's response? To do nothing? That's what you are saying, because, since hamas is using the Palestinian people as cover, ANY Israel military response is going to hurt the citizens. So, your answer is obviously, they have no response.

What would happen if israel decided to put artillery batteries in hospitals like hamas does. And hamas bombs that hospital to knock out that artillery, and kills Israeli citizens. Are you going to blame hamas? Or are you going to blame Israel for putting artillery in a hospital?
 
And still you put zero blame on hamas for putting military equipment in population centers, in hospitals, in schools.

N-word, Please, as they say on the street. The Zionists have been using the "We bombed that Hosptial because it had the bad guys in it" excuse since the 1980s when they invaded Lebanon. I don't think even they believe it anymore.

Israel isn't trying to kill civilians, they are trying to destroy hamas and their artillery, but hamas put that artillery in horrible places. Israel warns people before they are going to bomb an area. Hamas attacked Israel, Israel is making a response, not against the citizens but against hamas, who is putting their citizens in harms way, and yet you still blame Israel.

Yet, they've managed to kill 40,000 civilians, including 17,000 children.

Again, what SHOULD have been Israel's response? To do nothing? That's what you are saying, because, since hamas is using the Palestinian people as cover, ANY Israel military response is going to hurt the citizens. So, your answer is obviously, they have no response.

My answer is, Bibi never should have used Hamas as a foil to Fatah and the PA to avoid negotiating in good faith on a two-state solution.

What would happen if israel decided to put artillery batteries in hospitals like hamas does. And hamas bombs that hospital to knock out that artillery, and kills Israeli citizens. Are you going to blame hamas? Or are you going to blame Israel for putting artillery in a hospital?

I'm going to blame the Zionists for being on someone else's land.
 
Back
Top Bottom