AOC Endorses Bernie Sanders at DNC, Fires Off Bonkers Socialism Wish List

OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
 
Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?
Its the means to the end that worry us

Marxists like AOC know only one way to achieve tjeir goals - soak the rich

which has never succeeded whenever it was tried

Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?
 
Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?
Its the means to the end that worry us

Marxists like AOC know only one way to achieve tjeir goals - soak the rich

which has never succeeded whenever it was tried

Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
Why should a person who figures out how to make money share it with someone too lazy to do the same?
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

 
Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?
Its the means to the end that worry us

Marxists like AOC know only one way to achieve tjeir goals - soak the rich

which has never succeeded whenever it was tried

Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
Why should a person who figures out how to make money share it with someone too lazy to do the same?

I answered that. They are only making money because of Federal Reserve Socialist policies. If we end that I would quit arguing that they share it.
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

The national debt was 10.6 trillion when Obummer took office and 19.9 trillion when he left. Isn't that a difference of 9.3 trillion or so? So why is it even an issue with President Trump who isnt even through his first term yet?
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Because THE PEOPLE demand bailouts for the Scamdemic
 
Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
I confess that I barely understand what that means

But to me it means the federal government printing money any spending it by buying stocks and bonds to shore up their value

it not only benefits investors but helps the little guy also by boosting the economy

what marxists like AOC want is helicopter money for eternity whether people choose to work or not

that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

The national debt was 10.6 trillion when Obummer took office and 19.9 trillion when he left. Isn't that a difference of 9.3 trillion or so? So why is it even an issue with President Trump who isnt even through his first term yet?

It's an issue first of all because Trump called Obama a failure over the debt (and he was). Trump said the budget would be easy to balance. He was elected to do just that.

So let's use just over 9 trillion in eight years. Trump is at 7 trillion in 3.5 years. If we get another package before next year he will easily be at Obama's debt in half the time.

But you understand the issue.
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Because THE PEOPLE demand bailouts for the Scamdemic

No, Wall Street does.
 
Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
I confess that I barely understand what that means

But to me it means the federal government printing money any spending it by buying stocks and bonds to shore up their value

it not only benefits investors but helps the little guy also by boosting the economy

No, not really. It's like this.......trillions for wall street and that's great. People want a boost to the minimum wage and that's bad.

How can Wall Street be so healthy when Main Street isn't?

what marxists like AOC want is helicopter money for eternity whether people choose to work or not

Why not? That's what Wall Street is getting. Why should only the rich benefit?

that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves

Nowhere near as bad as the problems wall street is constantly causing.
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

The national debt was 10.6 trillion when Obummer took office and 19.9 trillion when he left. Isn't that a difference of 9.3 trillion or so? So why is it even an issue with President Trump who isnt even through his first term yet?

It's an issue first of all because Trump called Obama a failure over the debt (and he was). Trump said the budget would be easy to balance. He was elected to do just that.

So let's use just over 9 trillion in eight years. Trump is at 7 trillion in 3.5 years. If we get another package before next year he will easily be at Obama's debt in half the time.

But you understand the issue.
Sure I understand just not comparing someone who isnt even finished with their first term to Obama's record over 8 years. The President in a second term could lower it significantly once we are past the virus hoax.
 
Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
I confess that I barely understand what that means

But to me it means the federal government printing money any spending it by buying stocks and bonds to shore up their value

it not only benefits investors but helps the little guy also by boosting the economy

No, not really. It's like this.......trillions for wall street and that's great. People want a boost to the minimum wage and that's bad.

How can Wall Street be so healthy when Main Street isn't?

what marxists like AOC want is helicopter money for eternity whether people choose to work or not

Why not? That's what Wall Street is getting. Why should only the rich benefit?

that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves

Nowhere near as bad as the problems wall street is constantly causing.
I created a typo

here is what I wrote: “that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves”

when I meant to write: that is not ONLY bad for the economy but for poor people themselves
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

The national debt was 10.6 trillion when Obummer took office and 19.9 trillion when he left. Isn't that a difference of 9.3 trillion or so? So why is it even an issue with President Trump who isnt even through his first term yet?

It's an issue first of all because Trump called Obama a failure over the debt (and he was). Trump said the budget would be easy to balance. He was elected to do just that.

So let's use just over 9 trillion in eight years. Trump is at 7 trillion in 3.5 years. If we get another package before next year he will easily be at Obama's debt in half the time.

But you understand the issue.
Sure I understand just not comparing someone who isnt even finished with their first term to Obama's record over 8 years. The President in a second term could lower it significantly once we are past the virus hoax.

It was rising at a massive rate even before the virus thing. Trump hasn't shown any ability to be able to address the debt.
 
Again, it's fine for us to provide trillions for the rich by programs like Q.E. but it's wrong to want that shared with others.
I confess that I barely understand what that means

But to me it means the federal government printing money any spending it by buying stocks and bonds to shore up their value

it not only benefits investors but helps the little guy also by boosting the economy

No, not really. It's like this.......trillions for wall street and that's great. People want a boost to the minimum wage and that's bad.

How can Wall Street be so healthy when Main Street isn't?

what marxists like AOC want is helicopter money for eternity whether people choose to work or not

Why not? That's what Wall Street is getting. Why should only the rich benefit?

that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves

Nowhere near as bad as the problems wall street is constantly causing.
I created a typo

here is what I wrote: “that is not bad for the economy but for poor people themselves”

when I meant to write: that is not ONLY bad for the economy but for poor people themselves

Sure it is but the way we are going is making it only bad for the poor people.
 
OMG how horrible!!!!

including guaranteed health care, higher education, living wages, and labor rights for all people in the United States

Just horrible things. Do we really want people to be able to afford health care and make enough to live on?

She just throws some pixie dust and makes it happen, right? :rolleyes-41:
View attachment 376804

Why not? Is that not what we are doing about everything?

Are you stepping up to pay off the 27 trillion debt?
Isnt that about what the Muslim in Chief was at before his second term?

No.

When Trump took over the debt was just under $20 trillion. Today in 3.5 years it is almost $27 Trillion.
So still accruing debt, just slightly slower than Obama, amirite?

No. I believe Obama added $8 Trillion in eight years. Trump has added $7 trillion in 3.5 years.
Hmmmm I thought he added more than 8 then got it down in his second term....isnt that the case?

I would have to go back and look but no, I do not believe that to be the case.

Going back and looking that would indeed be no.

The national debt was 10.6 trillion when Obummer took office and 19.9 trillion when he left. Isn't that a difference of 9.3 trillion or so? So why is it even an issue with President Trump who isnt even through his first term yet?

It's an issue first of all because Trump called Obama a failure over the debt (and he was). Trump said the budget would be easy to balance. He was elected to do just that.

So let's use just over 9 trillion in eight years. Trump is at 7 trillion in 3.5 years. If we get another package before next year he will easily be at Obama's debt in half the time.

But you understand the issue.
Sure I understand just not comparing someone who isnt even finished with their first term to Obama's record over 8 years. The President in a second term could lower it significantly once we are past the virus hoax.

It was rising at a massive rate even before the virus thing. Trump hasn't shown any ability to be able to address the debt.
Riigght....maybe he should be given a fair chance like the Muslim in Chief always was
 

Forum List

Back
Top