Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

[Nostra]

And I've provided links explaining that you're grossly misinterpreting the decision.

Sorry sport, I don't have to "interpret" anything. The text is clear in both the Constitution and the SC ruling.

More 'Nuh-uh" from Moroner.

 

[g5000]

Actually, it's about your TDS, pumpkin.

Don't even bother, dipshit. Not after the past 4 years of Trumptards whining, moaning, thrashing and denying the 2020 election, and even going so far as to attempt to overthrow our democracy.

Don't even.

Like I said. It's all about the hypocrisy, dipshit.

Make all the T shirts you wish. It's a soothing balm for your Trump obsession.

I'm very tempted. I'd make a killing off Trumptards.

 

[Nostra]

Their name is redacted to protect their identify in court proceedings from MAGA extremists.

Still no source, huh liar?

 

[Marener]

Sorry sport, I don't have to "interpret" anything. The text is clear in both the Constitution and the SC ruling.

Everyone interprets language. You're misinterpreting it. If it were so clear, subsequent courts wouldn't have reached the exact opposite conclusion that you have reached.

 

[Marener]

Still no source, huh liar?

The court documents are the source, moron. You have nothing.

Ill take court documents over your baseless bullshit any day. Any rational person would.

 

[Hollie]

Don't even bother, dipshit. Not after the past 4 years of Trumptards whining, moaning, thrashing and denying the 2020 election, and even going so far as to attempt to overthrow our democracy.

Don't even.


I'm very tempted. I'd make a killing off Trumptards.

Ah, a hasty retreat to " overthrow our democracy".

You're binge watching the Joy Reid Clown Show as your silly slogans are stolen from such trash.

You would make a killing off the maladjusted demos who share your pathology.

I just even'ed.

 

[Nostra]

Everyone interprets language. You're misinterpreting it. If it were so clear, subsequent courts wouldn't have reached the exact opposite conclusion that you have reached.

More lies.

The most recent SC ruling says pardons are for a convicted person, Moroner.



Much later, the Court wrote that the broad power conferred in the Constitution gives the President plenary authority to 'forgive’ [a] convicted person in part or entirely, to reduce a penalty in terms of a specified number of years, or to alter it with certain conditions.4


Now look at the actual Constitution. No need to "interpret" anything, Moroner.


Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-1/ALDE_00013316/

 

[Nostra]

The court documents are the source, moron. You have nothing.

Ill take court documents over your baseless bullshit any day. Any rational person would.

Still nothing.

Sux to be you, Moroner.

 

[Marener]

The most recent SC ruling says pardons are for a convicted person, Moroner.

You’re misinterpreting that too. Hell, even Trump managed to pardon people who weren’t convicted yet. You’re obviously not very smart.

 

[Marener]

Still nothing.

Sux to be you, Moroner.

And yet it’s always more than you losers ever have.

 

[Hollie]

You’re misinterpreting that too. Hell, even Trump managed to pardon people who weren’t convicted yet. You’re obviously not very smart.

"But....but.....but....but what about Trump"?

 

[Nostra]

You’re misinterpreting that too. Hell, even Trump managed to pardon people who weren’t convicted yet. You’re obviously not very smart.

Why did you edit out my link and quotes from the link? Because they prove you are a lying sack.

Somehow you 'interpret" "offenses against the United States" and "convicted person" into "The didn't do nuttin'

 

[Marener]

Why did you edit out my link and quotes from the link? Because they prove you are a lying sack.

Somehow you 'interpret" "offenses against the United States" and "convicted person" into "The didn't do nuttin'

Because it’s irrelevant.

Presidents have given people pardons specifically because they were innocent of the charges. That’s widely regarded as a normal use of a pardon. Are you saying that’s impossible?

 

[Nostra]

Because it’s irrelevant.

Presidents have given people pardons specifically because they were innocent of the charges. That’s widely regarded as a normal use of a pardon. Are you saying that’s impossible?

What charges are there against his Crime Family, Fauci, Cheney, and Schiff?

List them.

 

[Marener]

What charges are there against his Crime Family, Fauci, Cheney, and Schiff?

List them.

None currently.

Why do you ask stupid questions?

 

[Nostra]

None currently.

Why do you ask stupid questions?

Because YOU brought it up, Dumbass.

Man, you are so stupid you can't even keep up with what you just posted.

 

[Marener]

Because YOU brought it up, Dumbass.

Man, you are so stupid you can't even keep up with what you just posted.

Two facts you seem to be unable to grasp.

1. You can give a pardon to someone who is innocent and committed no offenses
2. You can give a pardon to someone who is not yet convicted of any offense

Until you are able to understand these facts, nothing you say has any relevance.

 

[Nostra]

Two facts you seem to be unable to grasp.

1. You can give a pardon to someone who is innocent and committed no offenses
2. You can give a pardon to someone who is not yet convicted of any offense

Until you are able to understand these facts, nothing you say has any relevance.

1. Not according to the Constitution and SC rulings, Moroner.

2. No shit. But charges are required, according to the Constitution and SC rulings.

Too bad the actual documents involved prove you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

 

[Marener]

2. No shit. But charges are required, according to the Constitution and SC rulings.

Just a little while ago you said a conviction was required. You're already walking it back.

Show me the SCOTUS case that declared any such pardon unconstitutional.

 

[Nostra]

Just a little while ago you said a conviction was required. You're already walking it back.

Show me the SCOTUS case that declared any such pardon unconstitutional.

No stupid, I said that's what the Supreme Court ruled. See my link.

Learn to read, Moroner.

Show me a case brought to the SCOTUS.

GO!