AZ Repubs get a bump from the SCOTUS.

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
20,639
17,255
2,320
A Partial Win For Arizona Republicans And The Myth Of Non Citizen Voting

In what was at least a partial win for GOP Arizona lawmakers and the Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court on Thursday revived part of an Arizona measure requiring that people show proof of citizenship when registering to vote using a state-created form — an order, which election experts tell TPM, has the potential to disenfranchise thousands of voters who are legally eligible to vote.

Although the court did not greenlight Arizona’s effort to mandate proof of citizenship requirements for federal elections for voters using federal forms to register, the court’s order will require election officials to reject state voter registration forms if voters using them do not provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to reporting from CNN, over 40,000 “federal-only” voters have already been prohibited from casting ballots in state and local elections due to lack of documentary proof of citizenship.

“It’s a really disappointing decision because it means that a lot of people in Arizona who are legally eligible to vote will try to register and they will be rejected if they don’t have proof of citizenship on hand,” Brent Ferguson, senior legal counsel at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center said in an interview with TPM, “and it just really hurts democracy in Arizona and just for our country generally.”

Not only will this disenfranchise eligible voters, Ferguson also pointed out that the fact that this change will go into effect very close to an election, and will also create confusion around how to register and how to vote, breading distrust into the election system.

“This is a really big and confusing change very close to an election,” he said. “County officials throughout Arizona have to change how they’re treating applications that they get in, some of which may have already, they’re in the middle of processing them.”

Look What They Did To My Boy

Since the US doesn't have a voter fraud problem (no matter how loudly His Orangeness claims it does), what problem are laws like this designed to fix? That's easy. The problem of Repubs losing elections. They also serve to perpetuate the myth there is a problem.

Make no mistake. The national movement lead by Republicans to disenfranchise eligible voters is relentless, well organized, and in some instances is winning. This website........
https://www.democracydocket.com/...................... details the effort in graphic detail. It displays a dogged attempt to chip away at voter rights that began in earnest when the piece of shyte known as Individual 1 lost to Joe Biden by 7M votes. GA being at the forefront of the effort.

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump

At his rally last Saturday night, Donald Trump praised three members of the Georgia State Election Board. Calling them “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory,” Trump lavished praise and attention on these members of the obscure state agency — by name.

The odd exchange raised more than a few eyebrows. When I wrote about it earlier this week, I suggested that the least damning explanation was that the “three who Trump mentioned from the stage: Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King have refused to acknowledge that Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020.” We now know that the real reason for Trump’s support for the election officials was far more sinister.

Late yesterday, the board approved a new rule that seeks to expand the role and authority of county boards of election in the certification process. This new rule redefines the certification process to include “reasonable inquiry” into whether the results are “complete and accurate.”

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump
 
A Partial Win For Arizona Republicans And The Myth Of Non Citizen Voting

In what was at least a partial win for GOP Arizona lawmakers and the Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court on Thursday revived part of an Arizona measure requiring that people show proof of citizenship when registering to vote using a state-created form — an order, which election experts tell TPM, has the potential to disenfranchise thousands of voters who are legally eligible to vote.

Although the court did not greenlight Arizona’s effort to mandate proof of citizenship requirements for federal elections for voters using federal forms to register, the court’s order will require election officials to reject state voter registration forms if voters using them do not provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to reporting from CNN, over 40,000 “federal-only” voters have already been prohibited from casting ballots in state and local elections due to lack of documentary proof of citizenship.

“It’s a really disappointing decision because it means that a lot of people in Arizona who are legally eligible to vote will try to register and they will be rejected if they don’t have proof of citizenship on hand,” Brent Ferguson, senior legal counsel at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center said in an interview with TPM, “and it just really hurts democracy in Arizona and just for our country generally.”

Not only will this disenfranchise eligible voters, Ferguson also pointed out that the fact that this change will go into effect very close to an election, and will also create confusion around how to register and how to vote, breading distrust into the election system.

“This is a really big and confusing change very close to an election,” he said. “County officials throughout Arizona have to change how they’re treating applications that they get in, some of which may have already, they’re in the middle of processing them.”

Look What They Did To My Boy

Since the US doesn't have a voter fraud problem (no matter how loudly His Orangeness claims it does), what problem are laws like this designed to fix? That's easy. The problem of Repubs losing elections. They also serve to perpetuate the myth there is a problem.

Make no mistake. The national movement lead by Republicans to disenfranchise eligible voters is relentless, well organized, and in some instances is winning. This website........
https://www.democracydocket.com/...................... details the effort in graphic detail. It displays a dogged attempt to chip away at voter rights that began in earnest when the piece of shyte known as Individual 1 lost to Joe Biden by 7M votes. GA being at the forefront of the effort.

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump

At his rally last Saturday night, Donald Trump praised three members of the Georgia State Election Board. Calling them “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory,” Trump lavished praise and attention on these members of the obscure state agency — by name.

The odd exchange raised more than a few eyebrows. When I wrote about it earlier this week, I suggested that the least damning explanation was that the “three who Trump mentioned from the stage: Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King have refused to acknowledge that Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020.” We now know that the real reason for Trump’s support for the election officials was far more sinister.

Late yesterday, the board approved a new rule that seeks to expand the role and authority of county boards of election in the certification process. This new rule redefines the certification process to include “reasonable inquiry” into whether the results are “complete and accurate.”

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump
it is incumbent upon us to ensure that all of our voters have, or can get, or we know why they can't get the required documentation.

new laws like this tend to take effect with little notice to those so disenfranchised. how much time do they have to provide the documentation?
 
it is incumbent upon us to ensure that all of our voters have, or can get, or we know why they can't get the required documentation.

new laws like this tend to take effect with little notice to those so disenfranchised. how much time do they have to provide the documentation?
I would be open to the idea of these kinds of voter ID laws if they served a useful purpose with respect to election integrity. They don't. Cuz we don't have a problem with election integrity. Believing we do is based on a pack of lies.
 
A Partial Win For Arizona Republicans And The Myth Of Non Citizen Voting

In what was at least a partial win for GOP Arizona lawmakers and the Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court on Thursday revived part of an Arizona measure requiring that people show proof of citizenship when registering to vote using a state-created form — an order, which election experts tell TPM, has the potential to disenfranchise thousands of voters who are legally eligible to vote.

Although the court did not greenlight Arizona’s effort to mandate proof of citizenship requirements for federal elections for voters using federal forms to register, the court’s order will require election officials to reject state voter registration forms if voters using them do not provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to reporting from CNN, over 40,000 “federal-only” voters have already been prohibited from casting ballots in state and local elections due to lack of documentary proof of citizenship.

“It’s a really disappointing decision because it means that a lot of people in Arizona who are legally eligible to vote will try to register and they will be rejected if they don’t have proof of citizenship on hand,” Brent Ferguson, senior legal counsel at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center said in an interview with TPM, “and it just really hurts democracy in Arizona and just for our country generally.”

Not only will this disenfranchise eligible voters, Ferguson also pointed out that the fact that this change will go into effect very close to an election, and will also create confusion around how to register and how to vote, breading distrust into the election system.

“This is a really big and confusing change very close to an election,” he said. “County officials throughout Arizona have to change how they’re treating applications that they get in, some of which may have already, they’re in the middle of processing them.”

Look What They Did To My Boy

Since the US doesn't have a voter fraud problem (no matter how loudly His Orangeness claims it does), what problem are laws like this designed to fix? That's easy. The problem of Repubs losing elections. They also serve to perpetuate the myth there is a problem.

Make no mistake. The national movement lead by Republicans to disenfranchise eligible voters is relentless, well organized, and in some instances is winning. This website........
https://www.democracydocket.com/...................... details the effort in graphic detail. It displays a dogged attempt to chip away at voter rights that began in earnest when the piece of shyte known as Individual 1 lost to Joe Biden by 7M votes. GA being at the forefront of the effort.

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump

At his rally last Saturday night, Donald Trump praised three members of the Georgia State Election Board. Calling them “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory,” Trump lavished praise and attention on these members of the obscure state agency — by name.

The odd exchange raised more than a few eyebrows. When I wrote about it earlier this week, I suggested that the least damning explanation was that the “three who Trump mentioned from the stage: Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King have refused to acknowledge that Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020.” We now know that the real reason for Trump’s support for the election officials was far more sinister.

Late yesterday, the board approved a new rule that seeks to expand the role and authority of county boards of election in the certification process. This new rule redefines the certification process to include “reasonable inquiry” into whether the results are “complete and accurate.”

Georgia Election Deniers Deliver for Trump
How is non citizens voting a "myth"? Do you even follow current news? :cuckoo:
 
new laws like this tend to take effect with little notice to those so disenfranchised. how much time do they have to provide the documentation?
"My concern is that changes to the process should not occur this close to an election, it creates confusion for voters,”. Secretary Fontes emphasized, “We respect the Court's decision and will implement these changes while continuing to protect voter access and make a voting simple process."
 
I would be open to the idea of these kinds of voter ID laws if they served a useful purpose with respect to election integrity. They don't. Cuz we don't have a problem with election integrity. Believing we do is based on a pack of lies.
Cuz we don't have a problem with election integrity. Believing we do is based on a pack of lies.
did you miss the thread on this the other day?

 
I would be open to the idea of these kinds of voter ID laws if they served a useful purpose with respect to election integrity. They don't. Cuz we don't have a problem with election integrity. Believing we do is based on a pack of lies.
i agree with you.

but these laws will be passed and upheld.

we can continue to oppose them, but it won't hurt to help as many people to get the required papers as possible.
 
So the state of Arizona is running fair and accurate elections but our federal government refuses to. That's because free and fair elections hurt Marxist Democrat's chance of winning. MAGA
AZ is running elections that disenfranchise eligible voters. Apparently, in trumpworld that makes them free and fair.
Federal elections are essentially free of voter fraud as has been proven over and over. trump's lies notwithstanding.
 
he court’s order will require election officials to reject state voter registration forms if voters using them do not provide documentary proof of citizenship.
good
 
i agree with you.

but these laws will be passed and upheld.

we can continue to oppose them, but it won't hurt to help as many people to get the required papers as possible.
Sure, I'm all for it. Eligible voters should get to vote despite Repub's best efforts to stop them. "Them" being a certain demographic Repubs don't want voting because of who they tend to vote for.
 
Since we don't have a voter fraud problem I see this as the larger problem.

 
Sure, I'm all for it. Eligible voters should get to vote despite Repub's best efforts to stop them. "Them" being a certain demographic Repubs don't want voting because of who they tend to vote for.
out of curiosity, have you ever met someone that COULDN'T get an ID?

not someone that doesn't have one, someone couldn't get one.
 
out of curiosity, have you ever met someone that COULDN'T get an ID?
How does, let's say a college ID, prove citizenship? Wouldn't that require something like a birth certificate? Do you have one? Can you see how others may not?
 
How does, let's say a college ID, prove citizenship? Wouldn't that require something like a birth certificate?
a deflection?

standard operating procedure.

BTW, "How does, let's say a college ID, prove citizenship?"

it doesn't, it proves residency.
 

Forum List

Back
Top