Begining of the end of Likud?

[pbel]

Perhaps this tiny crack in Netanyahu's coalition will lead to a larger fissure and finally get the right wing war party into the dustbin of History...

Israelis may finally get the stability and peace they deserve...


Israeli boycott of Rouhani UN speech 'a mistake', says finance minister | World news | theguardian.com



A senior Israeli minister has criticised Binyamin Netanyahu's instruction to Israel's UN delegation to boycott the Iranian president's speech at the general assembly, saying it created the impression that Israel was not interested in encouraging a peaceful solution to Iran's suspected nuclear programme.

In a text message statement sent to reporters on Wednesday, the finance minister Yair Lapid described Netanyahu's instruction to Israeli delegates to leave during the speech as a mistake.

"Israel should not seem as if it is serially opposed to negotiations and as a country that is uninterested in peaceful solutions," said Lapid, whose centrist Yesh Atid party went into coalition with Netanyahu's Likud in March. "Leaving the UN general assembly and boycotting is irrelevant in current diplomacy, and is reminiscent of the way Arab countries have acted towards Israel."

Israel believes Iran is trying to develop a nuclear bomb, and Netanyahu has voiced scepticism at recent moderate gestures by the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, whom he has called "a wolf in sheep's clothing". Israeli officials fear Rouhani's outreach to the west could lead to an easing of international pressure on the country.

 

[Connery]

Moved to proper forum

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

 

[P F Tinmore]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqU5aFMfRwc]Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's Full UN Address (2013) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Lipush]

Perhaps this tiny crack in Netanyahu's coalition will lead to a larger fissure and finally get the right wing war party into the dustbin of History...

Israelis may finally get the stability and peace they deserve...


Israeli boycott of Rouhani UN speech 'a mistake', says finance minister | World news | theguardian.com



A senior Israeli minister has criticised Binyamin Netanyahu's instruction to Israel's UN delegation to boycott the Iranian president's speech at the general assembly, saying it created the impression that Israel was not interested in encouraging a peaceful solution to Iran's suspected nuclear programme.

In a text message statement sent to reporters on Wednesday, the finance minister Yair Lapid described Netanyahu's instruction to Israeli delegates to leave during the speech as a mistake.

"Israel should not seem as if it is serially opposed to negotiations and as a country that is uninterested in peaceful solutions," said Lapid, whose centrist Yesh Atid party went into coalition with Netanyahu's Likud in March. "Leaving the UN general assembly and boycotting is irrelevant in current diplomacy, and is reminiscent of the way Arab countries have acted towards Israel."

Israel believes Iran is trying to develop a nuclear bomb, and Netanyahu has voiced scepticism at recent moderate gestures by the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, whom he has called "a wolf in sheep's clothing". Israeli officials fear Rouhani's outreach to the west could lead to an easing of international pressure on the country.

What does the thread's title has to do with the contast of the post itself?

Ya'ir Lapid conveyed a criticism on the prime minister's policy.

That fine and acceptable.

"The beginning of the end of the Likud?"

Oh please. Ya'ir Lapid's party won 12 Mandates. Netanyahu won 31 in election.

Recent poll shows Ya'ir Lapid is dropping in support, he is basically the most hated politician due to his failing economic policy.

So, what does the thread's title got to do with what you just said?

Enlighten me, someone. please.

 

[Lipush]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

And Israel is to be controled by which party?

 

[Hossfly]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

 

[P F Tinmore]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

Peace.

 

[Hossfly]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

Peace.

Oh, did your friends change their charters about destroying Israel. Perhaps you can show us their new charters where this aspect is omitted. Remember, Tinnie, that your good friends in Gaza said they would never accept Israel.

 

[Lipush]

While many of us would like to be hopeful right wing warmongers in Israel would soon cease their reign in power there, realistically speaking I am not too hopeful we will see that happening anytime soon.

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

Peace.

But suggesting that the Palestinians lay down their arms, by your dictionary is "surrending" and "defeat".

Gotta love the double standard.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

Peace.

But suggesting that the Palestinians lay down their arms, by your dictionary is "surrending" and "defeat".

Gotta love the double standard.

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

 

[P F Tinmore]

In other words, you believe Israel should lay down their arms and expose the other cheek? How would that turn out?

Peace.

Oh, did your friends change their charters about destroying Israel. Perhaps you can show us their new charters where this aspect is omitted. Remember, Tinnie, that your good friends in Gaza said they would never accept Israel.

Name a country that would accept an occupation?

I await your response.

 

[toastman]

Peace.

But suggesting that the Palestinians lay down their arms, by your dictionary is "surrending" and "defeat".

Gotta love the double standard.

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

What do you mean by Israel disarming ?? Getting rid of their army ?

 

[Lipush]

Peace.

But suggesting that the Palestinians lay down their arms, by your dictionary is "surrending" and "defeat".

Gotta love the double standard.

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

Both sides disarming? sure, I'm ok with that.

But I'm being realistic, is all

 

[Lipush]

But suggesting that the Palestinians lay down their arms, by your dictionary is "surrending" and "defeat".

Gotta love the double standard.

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

What do you mean by Israel disarming ?? Getting rid of their army ?

probably something like that-

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSQnfSfAsPM]Obama's underwater fantasy - YouTube[/ame]

 

[P F Tinmore]

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

What do you mean by Israel disarming ?? Getting rid of their army ?

probably something like that-

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSQnfSfAsPM]Obama's underwater fantasy - YouTube[/ame]

Well, at least it is not the same old shit the US has been shoveling for the last 20 years.

 

[toastman]

I have no problem with both sides disarming.

I have no double standard. Do you?

What do you mean by Israel disarming ?? Getting rid of their army ?

probably something like that-

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSQnfSfAsPM]Obama's underwater fantasy - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Lipush]

What do you mean by Israel disarming ?? Getting rid of their army ?

probably something like that-

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSQnfSfAsPM]Obama's underwater fantasy - YouTube[/ame]

LOLz

 

[irosie91]

Perhaps this tiny crack in Netanyahu's coalition will lead to a larger fissure and finally get the right wing war party into the dustbin of History...

Israelis may finally get the stability and peace they deserve...


Israeli boycott of Rouhani UN speech 'a mistake', says finance minister | World news | theguardian.com



A senior Israeli minister has criticised Binyamin Netanyahu's instruction to Israel's UN delegation to boycott the Iranian president's speech at the general assembly, saying it created the impression that Israel was not interested in encouraging a peaceful solution to Iran's suspected nuclear programme.

In a text message statement sent to reporters on Wednesday, the finance minister Yair Lapid described Netanyahu's instruction to Israeli delegates to leave during the speech as a mistake.

"Israel should not seem as if it is serially opposed to negotiations and as a country that is uninterested in peaceful solutions," said Lapid, whose centrist Yesh Atid party went into coalition with Netanyahu's Likud in March. "Leaving the UN general assembly and boycotting is irrelevant in current diplomacy, and is reminiscent of the way Arab countries have acted towards Israel."

Israel believes Iran is trying to develop a nuclear bomb, and Netanyahu has voiced scepticism at recent moderate gestures by the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, whom he has called "a wolf in sheep's clothing". Israeli officials fear Rouhani's outreach to the west could lead to an easing of international pressure on the country.

What does the thread's title has to do with the contast of the post itself?

Ya'ir Lapid conveyed a criticism on the prime minister's policy.

That fine and acceptable.

"The beginning of the end of the Likud?"

Oh please. Ya'ir Lapid's party won 12 Mandates. Netanyahu won 31 in election.

Recent poll shows Ya'ir Lapid is dropping in support, he is basically the most hated politician due to his failing economic policy.

So, what does the thread's title got to do with what you just said?

Enlighten me, someone. please.

Lipush I have lived amongst people of the sherri creed all my life and have
posted among them for more than 10 years------They have typical techniques---
among them are FRAUDULENT THREAD TITLES -----I believe they hope that
most people do not actually read the articles

 

[pbel]

What Americans thinkJohn 1 minute ago
0

5


I hope this lying thief would stop pushing his luck and stop putting the Jewish lives at the risk of Iran's missals showering the
stolen land to convert them to the desert as it used to be. The man is so arrogant and bellicose and does not know where to stop.

More
.
Reply .
.
.






Pacman 56 seconds ago
0

0


Help yourself, we are not in a position to do anything for your.

More
.
Reply .
.
.






The RealLily 5 hours ago
12

287


Guess Israel will have to go it alone--our government is closed until further notice.

More
.
Expand Replies (18) Reply .
.
.






Just Me 45 seconds ago
0

1


Good that's exactly what Israel should do fight their own battles and leave America out of it. Let the victor take the spoils too. Who cares, that piece of worthless dirt has spilled enough blood for ten thousand years.
Besides the Jews have so much money they could buy all the real estate in any part of the world they wanted why the dust bowl in sweltering heat with flies and stink to choke a barn full of pigs? Chosen land really it was a bad choice. Now Fiji that's a nice place maybe Bora Bora,

More
.
Reply .
.
.






frosty 21 seconds ago
0

0


Two prophecies found in the writings of Isaiah and Jeremiah suggest that Damascus, the Syrian capitol, will experience the brunt of the nuclear onslaught. In Isaiah 17:1-2, we find these words--"The burden against Damascus. Behold, Damascus will cease from being a city, and it will be a ruinous heap."

More
.
Reply .
.
.






Soldier Of Allah 18 seconds ago
0

0


Iran is the worst enemy of Islam and all the Sunni Al Qaeda Muslims. They are in bed with the evil Jews.Destroy Iran and kill kill kill the Shi'ite Heretics and Jews then the world will be in the real peace

More
.
Reply .
.
.






isateenough 2 hours ago
2

37


Have at it. Mr. President, he said alone.

More
.
Expand Replies (3) Reply .
.
.






LYNN 1 hour ago
1

14


He has a point but we need to see how this sorts out. The entire world wants us to take on the responsibility of the worlds safety.They prosper while we mire in debt.Let them go it alone.We need to take care of us for a change.

More
.
Expand Replies (2) Reply .
.
.






laurel 4 hours ago
1

11


Some censorship on this story, as with past stories on Israel. The piece comes and goes in Yahoo News, depending on who is posting and how many are posting.

More
.
Expand Replies (3) Reply