Biden might pardon Fauci

Constitutionally, probably legal. Whether advisable, is something else, especially if no legal charges have ever filed. After all, accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt of some criminal act, charged or not. It does nothing, regarding lawsuits in our litigious society, that I am aware of.
Not legal. There has been no conviction.
 
Who exactly?

Surely you’re not claiming that the rioters who broke into the Capitol are your elite brain trust?

No, I'm talking about anyone who's been accused of being racist, bigot, misogynist, anti gay simply for having view point they don't agree with.

Then there is the 10 year crusade against trump.

Then there is the attack on any person who bucks the liberal agenda, like musk.

the dems have been on the attack since trump came down the escalator that day.
 
So the question is....CAN his pardons and money sending be reversed due to his mental incapacities? Is there nothing in the constitution that can be used to stop him?
 
Here is one of Trump's lawyers when orange Mussolini whines about being "persecuted":


Lol, yeah, lawfare is certainly a handy tool. Because of BS cases, you get to use the "convict" moniker. Too bad leftys won't ever hold their own accountable. Maybe this administration will do that.
 
He's also sending yet another 500 million to Ukraine. While Calif burns. He is doing his best to destroy all that he can while in office.
You dipshits just can't stop sucking Putin's cock, can you.

California has received funds from the President's Disaster Relief Fund.

Nice try.


The FMAG, which is provided through the President’s Disaster Relief Fund on cost-share basis, will assist local, state, and tribal agencies responding to the fire to apply for 75 percent reimbursement of their eligible fire suppression costs. Yesterday, Governor Newsom announced FMAGs were secured for the Palisades and Eaton fires.
 
Not legal. There has been no conviction.
Here is what I found.
The pardon power is considered "plenary" and thus generally cannot be restricted or modified by Congress or the judiciary.[4][7] In Ex parte Garland (1867), the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed the "unlimited"

Pardons have been used for presumptive cases, most notably when President Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon over any possible crimes connected with the Watergate scandal;
[8]

The Supremes could decide, but would only affect pardons going forth, as no ruling in place at this time.
 
I've seen how North Carolina citizens are dealing. You go look and try again, Schmuck

You're clueless as usual
Yes, your idiot propagandists fucked them over, not FEMA. Fox News filled their heads with lies and propaganda.

That's not FEMA's fault.

That's probably why they extended their deadline:

 
Yes, your idiot propagandists fucked them over, not FEMA. Fox News filled their heads with lies and propaganda.

That's not FEMA's fault.

That's probably why they extended their deadline:


Oh dry up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top