Biden's Votes and Benford's Law

[Norman]

Benford's law is used to detect tax fraud - and election fraud. It says that the distribution of the leading digit of legitimate returns should statistically approximately follow Benford's law.

Here are vote counts by candidate in Chicago:

Which one does not belong...

This basically suggests that they added two to the leading digit of each batch. Of course, it's only circumstantial, but suggests fraud.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Benford's law is used to detect tax fraud - and election fraud. It says that the distribution of the leading digit of legitimate returns should statistically approximately follow Benford's law.

Here are vote counts by candidate in Chicago:

Which one does not belong...

This basically suggests that they added two to the leading digit of each batch. Of course, it's only circumstantial, but suggests fraud.

These bastards will be ratted out, promise.

Donald Trump is an ex-Democrat who is familiar with how these bastards operate.

He didnt just blindly walk into this thing.

More surprises will come out by end of the year.

 

[Drop Dead Fred]

Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics) - GNEWS

Joe Biden's election data violate the Benford's law used to check if a set of numbers are natural or fabricated. This is another proof of voter fraud by the Democrat Party.

gnews.org

Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics)

Author: River|Himalaya Scholars

November 7, 2020

As the vote counting for the 2020 Presidential Election continues, various facts suggest rampant frauds in Joe Biden’s votes. So does mathematics in terms of the votes from precincts.

Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.

This is what described by Wikipedia:

“Benford’s law, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small.

For example, in sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time. Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on.”

One of the examples is the population of the world, which are naturally occurring numbers.

Distribution of first-digit (in %) of population numbers in 237 countries in 2010.

A number of people on the internet have checked the votes (precinct by precinct) of Joe Biden, Donald Trump as well as other candidates for their legitimacy in terms of the Benford’s Law.

According a Reddit user, r/dataisbeautiful’s calculation, the ‘normal’ distribution of first digits for the different candidates based on Benford’s law is illustrated below.

Youtuber Nyar has shared the observations on a number of counties, concluding that Trump and others’ votes have natural distribution but not for Joe Biden’s.

In Fulton County, Georgia, which overlaps with the Atlantic metropolitan where Joe Biden is expected to win, all of the three candidates have normal distributions for their votes. (Joe Biden 72.6%, Donald Trump 26.2%, Jo Jorgensen 1.2%.)

In Miami-Dade County of Florida, which includes the Miami metropolitan where Joe Biden is expected to win, all candidates’ votes obey Benford’s Law. (Joe Biden 53.4%, Donald Trump 46.1%, Jo Jorgensen 0.3%.)

However, in the Milwaukee County of Wisconsin, which is in one of the key swing states, Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law while other candidates’ don’t. (Joe Biden 69.4%, Donald Trump 29.4%, Jo Jorgensen 0.9%.)

And in Chicago of Illinois, Joe Biden’s votes are abnormal.

So does that of Allegheny of Pennsylvania which includes Pittsburgh. (Joe Biden 59.0%, Donald Trump 39.9%, Jo Jorgensen 1.2%.)

It looks like maybe Biden had lost big cities like Chicago and Pittsburgh, which is why the fraudulent votes need to be brought in, which skew his curve away from a normal looking one.

For those who are interested to reproduce the analysis, you can follow the instructions here and give it a go.

Author: River|Himalaya Scholars

 

[linux07]

 

[linux07]