J.D Vance wants children to vote.

[DudleySmith]

I don't see anything you said in that MSN article or the video at the 20 minute mark.

They just parrot stuff; they never read anything themselves. That's why it's pointless to post links for these POS's..

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Knowing how democrats lie this will not be believed either.

 

[progressive hunter]

Not surprising, but MAGAs say they would be just fine doing away with one person, one vote.

why are you mad some repubes are moving to your side

 

[initforme]

It's nobody's duty to have kids.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Children are counted in the census so the can be represented in congress.

By that logic, they should vote. Of course it should be their parents who tell them how to vote or vote their proxy.

I’m shocked that the OP isn’t supporting this. Democrats believe parents should be investigated by CPS if they disagree with school counselors on medical care for their child or what gender their child is or even their own child’s name.

IN NO TIME, they’d want the same for parents who don’t vote their kids’ proxies as the teachers’ union wants them to.

 

[excalibur]

Not surprising, but MAGAs say they would be just fine doing away with one person, one vote.

Nope, it is mostly Dems pushing rank choice voting and that definitely isn't one person, one vote.

 

[Woodznutz]

I disagree with allowing children to vote .

Me too. It would be the end of the Republican party and conservatism in America.

 

[Woodznutz]

What opposition? But Um abortion and birth control do the opposite of making babies…wow

If children got to vote the Democrats would begin reproducing like rabbits.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Vance is not the sharpest whatever in the whatever.

 

[DudleySmith]

Vance is not the sharpest whatever in the whatever.

lol says a moron.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

Weren’t democrats wanting to drop the voting age to like 16 or 14?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Vance is not the sharpest whatever in the whatever.

Well he shived you in the asshole so theres that.

 

[Couchpotato]

Dumbass. They take away choice. And if you could just see past your own religious fever dream, you'd see that keeping both as choices for women..will have the effect of encouraging women to have their babies...willingly.

But..that's just not in God's plan..is it?

1. Birth control is more widely available now than at any other time in history.

2. Up until very recently you could say the same for abortion


Birth rates werent higher.

 

[Couchpotato]

Nope, it is mostly Dems pushing rank choice voting and that definitely isn't one person, one vote.

I don’t think you understand hiw ranked choice voting works.

 

[Lastamender]

A decidedly milquetoast choice.
Flops more than Trump himself does.

He is going to be VP.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1. Birth control is more widely available now than at any other time in history.

And a target of both the SC and conservative legislatures. So don't waste my time here.

2. Up until very recently you could say the same for abortion

Precedent was overturned at the drop of a hat..because...God willed it.

Birth rates werent higher.

 

[eagle7-31]

And a target of both the SC and conservative legislatures. So don't waste my time here.

Precedent was overturned at the drop of a hat..because...God willed it.

Precedent was overturned in 1954 so its nothing new. So Plessy vs Ferguson would be on the books according to your logic.

 

[Lastamender]

Nope, it is mostly Dems pushing rank choice voting and that definitely isn't one person, one vote.

That is how Murkowski got elected again in Alaska.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

He is going to be VP.

Don't bet the farm on it!

 

[Lastamender]

Don't bet the farm on it!

Who is going to beat Trump?