Zoom Rookie Nov 14, 2011 2,215 286 0 Dec 16, 2012 Banned #1 He had a good point. I am all for gun ownership. I am not for civilians owning semi automatic assult weapons. What's next, tanks?
He had a good point. I am all for gun ownership. I am not for civilians owning semi automatic assult weapons. What's next, tanks?
Paulie Diamond Member May 19, 2007 40,769 6,382 1,830 Dec 16, 2012 #2 No we're going right for nukes bro. No more sitting in trees for hours smelling like shit in the hopes that MAYBE a deer walks by. We're nuking the whole fucking forest. No question that you got one.
No we're going right for nukes bro. No more sitting in trees for hours smelling like shit in the hopes that MAYBE a deer walks by. We're nuking the whole fucking forest. No question that you got one.
Zoom Rookie Nov 14, 2011 2,215 286 0 Dec 16, 2012 Thread starter Banned #3 Ok. Nukes for school children.
Mad Scientist Feels Good! Sep 15, 2008 24,196 5,431 270 Dec 16, 2012 #4 If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we?
Zoom Rookie Nov 14, 2011 2,215 286 0 Dec 16, 2012 Thread starter Banned #5 Mad Scientist said: If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we? Click to expand... So, you want to own a nuclear weapon because the govt owns them? Surface to air missles perhaps?
Mad Scientist said: If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we? Click to expand... So, you want to own a nuclear weapon because the govt owns them? Surface to air missles perhaps?