otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 42,434
- 13,924
- 2,165
About what?The Daily Caller article was correct.
#LIBTARD
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About what?The Daily Caller article was correct.
#LIBTARD
About what?
Again, I’ve read the DC article. The proposals are planning ideas for a future which will have less oil in it.Post #1, maybe you should check it out?
Again, I’ve read the DC article. The proposals are planning ideas for a future which will have less oil in it.
The article throws a misleading headline and doesn’t offer any factual evidence to back it up.
todd the article states that less oil will be in California’s future.They aren't planning for less oil in the world.
They are planning on running state owned refineries to provide gas to cars in the state.
todd the article states that less oil will be in California’s future.
Yes, less oil in state. They’re planning ideas for a market which could become a monopoly.The article is about lower future demand for gasoline and refineries shutting down.
State run refineries are the issue, not whether they refine California oil or imported oil.
Yes, less oil in state. They’re planning ideas for a market which could become a monopoly.
No, just government greed and corruption. Every country that has nationalized its oil industry has failed.It’s how you assure you don’t get Enron greed.
Enron is the corporate poster boy for greed and corruption.No, just government greed and corruption. Every country that has nationalized its oil industry has failed.
Yes, they want to make it a governmental monopoly and since the greens essentially run California, there will be even more draconian restrictions on POL production. As it is, the greens have prevented any new construction or modernization/expansion of existing refineries since 1982. For those who are mathematically challenged, that is FORTY TWO YEARS. In that time California's population has grown from 23,800,800 to 38,965,193 people.Yes, less oil in state. They’re planning ideas for a market which could become a monopoly.
It was cheaper under Enron, Grey Davis negotiated contracts at the top of the market after Enron folded that locked California into long-term contracts at the highest energy prices ever seen in California. That was the biggest reason he was recalled from office.Was electricity cheaper in CA with public power or with Enron?
Californians have been choking on pollution for the past 50 years. They’re refusing to continue with that.Yes, they want to make it a governmental monopoly and since the greens essentially run California, there will be even more draconian restrictions on POL production. As it is, the greens have prevented any new construction or modernization/expansion of existing refineries since 1982. For those who are mathematically challenged, that is FORTY TWO YEARS. In that time California's population has grown from 23,800,800 to 38,965,193 people.
Enron was simple. The greens passe laws against publicly owned power generation facilities forcing California's energy sector to buy power from privately owned sources, mostly out of state. Enron saw the ability to corner the market and make obscene profits.Explain Enron to us all
The greens in California passed no such laws.Enron was simple. The greens passe laws against publicly owned power generation facilities forcing California's energy sector to buy power from privately owned sources, mostly out of state. Enron saw the ability to corner the market and make obscene profits.
California has some of the cleanest air in the country. Places like the LA basin will never have clean air because of the geography. Before the White Man arrived, the Indians called LA the "valley of the smokes" because the inversion pattern did not allow the smoke of their campfires to escape over the mountains and the prevailing winds blow from west to east not allowing the smoke to escape out to sea.Californians have been choking on pollution for the past 50 years. They’re refusing to continue with that.
I overstated the case. What the greens managed to do was to cap residential rates, while having blocked the construction of new power plants for over a decade creating a shortage as price controls always do assisted by the republican's attempt to deregulate energy supply that resulted in a bastardized system that forced California to buy power on the spot market at high prices and sell it at low prices.The greens in California passed no such laws.
Farms need petroleum products ranging from diesel fuel to fertilizers to operate. When the price or availability of refinery products rises or becomes scarce, so does food.What do farms have to do with refineries?
It is cheaper the business way. We need to drill more, new refineries and pipelines.Some Trumpies have talked about nationalizing the US oil industry. Of course they are ignorant fringe people. They think oil belongs to the people. They don't realize the oil business is a BUSINESS.
The EPA map shows all of California to have either good or moderate air quality.California has some of the cleanest air in the country. Places like the LA basin will never have clean air because of the geography. Before the White Man arrived, the Indians called LA the "valley of the smokes" because the inversion pattern did not allow the smoke of their campfires to escape over the mountains and the prevailing winds blow from west to east not allowing the smoke to escape out to sea.