Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
A Jew probably.
What color was his skin?
Did he come to save humanity from their sins or from their debts?
He Died for our Debt, not our Sins | Michael Hudson
A Jew probably.
Probably?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Jew probably.
What color was his skin?
Did he come to save humanity from their sins or from their debts?
He Died for our Debt, not our Sins | Michael Hudson
Leftists refuse to acknowledge that anyone would decide cases based on the Constitution because leftists want to destroy the Constitution.Constitutional protections? Who the fuck do you think your kidding. You’re either trying to gaslight me with that codswallop or you are stupid enough to believe it . With Trumps stacked court there is no such thing as constitutional protections that we can count on. The conservative majority has repeatedly shown that they have no regard for precedent and what was once considered settled law. They rule on ideology and disregard the facts and the law. Even those like Thomas who profess to be textualists adhere to that philosophy only to the extent that it suits their ideological goals
Now, go back and read my posts 223 and 263 which you never actually responded to and certainly did not even attempt to refute . Lets see if you can come up with some sort of reasonable response based on facts and logic without resorting to fallacies and obfuscations . I dare you
The conservative majority has repeatedly shown that they have no regard for precedent and what was once considered settled law.
That makes no fucking sense at all. You are the ones projectingLeftists refuse to acknowledge that anyone would decide cases based on the Constitution because leftists want to destroy the Constitution.
Stop projecting your desire for despotism on normal people.
Nice try slick. I did not say that no rulings should ever be overturned. There is a difference between ruling that bestow rights and ruling that take established rights away. It is only recently that the high has engaged in the latterSettled, like Plessy v Ferguson?
Nice try slick. I did not say that no rulings should ever be overturned. There is a difference between ruling that bestow rights and ruling that take established rights away. It is only recently that the high has engaged in the latter
Because you say so Appeal to ignorance logical fallacyt makes perfect sense.
Have you been looking in my window again, creep?And you really need to stop drinking. Your liver's going to wind up in worse shape than your stomach.
Do you have a problem with reading comprehension?Plessy wasn't "settled law"?
Why not?
Do you have a problem with reading comprehension?
No where in your response did you prove I made a claim that Christian nationalism didn't exist.Stop it! Just fucking STOP IT. Another attempt at gaslighting.
From your post 191: What is Christian nationalism?
Who is promoting it?
Where?
From your post # 192 : What is Christian nationalism?
Another one of those cooked up leftist terms that mean nothing to the educated.
From your post # 346: “Show where these religious fanatics have or are attempting to do what you claimed...”
Your Cloward Piven religion is all about that.There is a difference between ruling that bestow rights and ruling that take established rights away. It is only recently that the high has engaged in the latter
There are a couple Muslim sympathizers I'd like to see deported from congress.Stop all new Muslim immigration to the US.
Prioritize Muslims for Trump's deportation plans.
I just find it disturbing that Muslims are not being held accountable for tolerance and diversity here in the US and Western Europe.
Maybe it's true. The guy sounds like a jihadist but the FBI has a reputation for internet entrapment. Rather than a "tip" the FBI monitors the internet and draws these people into a conspiracy that they really had no intention of doing.
Enough of the bullshit already!!No where in your response did you prove I made a claim that Christian nationalism didn't exist.
Once again, show where I explicitly made that claim.
You're the one with the religion problemYour Cloward Piven religion is all about that.
Did I say that it was not settled law? I said that some rulings need to be overturned for the reasons statedPlessy wasn't "settled law"?
Why not?