Colorado Father Fights To Keep Government From Sterilizing His 14-Year-Old Son

Right or wrong I personally agree that 14 is to young for major life altering changes.
YET I do not really know much about trans stuff.
I DO wonder why this seems so important, as its always been a small part of the population.
And we have MANY MANY things going on that if not addressed WILL effect ALL 14 YEAR OLDS
IN a few years.
 
Right or wrong I personally agree that 14 is to young for major life altering changes.
YET I do not really know much about trans stuff.
I DO wonder why this seems so important, as its always been a small part of the population.
And we have MANY MANY things going on that if not addressed WILL effect ALL 14 YEAR OLDS
IN a few years.

I DO wonder why this seems so important, as its always been a small part of the population.

Mutilating children, even a small number, is important.
 
I DO wonder why this seems so important, as its always been a small part of the population.

Mutilating children, even a small number, is important.

Children are not mutilated, not even a small number.

You cannot do gender affirming surgery on children. You have to wait until they're adults, and have fully gone through puberty, or the surgery doesn't work.

We keep telling you children are not being mutilated, and you continue to believe the lies.



 
Children are not mutilated, not even a small number.

You cannot do gender affirming surgery on children. You have to wait until they're adults, and have fully gone through puberty, or the surgery doesn't work.

We keep telling you children are not being mutilated, and you continue to believe the lies.




Children are not mutilated, not even a small number.

Liar.

You cannot do gender affirming surgery on children.

They have done it.

You have to wait until they're adults, and have fully gone through puberty, or the surgery doesn't work.

The surgery never works.
XX = men, even if you cut parts off.
XY = women, even if you try to add a part.
Delusional people aren't fixed by mutilating them.
 
I DO wonder why this seems so important, as its always been a small part of the population.

Mutilating children, even a small number, is important.
Agree TWO DEAD BABYS from measles, When we have had a cure for 40 years.
 
Because he's suing.
That’s a pretty large assumptive leap. His suing does not mean he’s not listening.

It hasn’t occurred to you that he simply does not agree that his son should be getting these kinds of medical procedures while still a minor?

The article does not indicate in any way that he doesn’t want the procedures done at all. In fact, he makes it clear that the procedures should not be done until he’s eighteen.

You’re conflating and embellishing the issue and you’re making unfounded assumptions based on that.
 
I read part of it, but the concept exists, that's all I was asked to prove.

Not the veracity or validity of it, but the concept itself.

No dummy you were asked to prove the this is some sort of widespread position on the left. It's isn't and you are again full of shit.

It's classic pigeonhole fallacy. Take someone on the left with a position, pretend like it applies to most.
 
No dummy you were asked to prove the this is some sort of widespread position on the left. It's isn't and you are again full of shit.

It's classic pigeonhole fallacy. Take someone on the left with a position, pretend like it applies to most.


Here comes the goalpost move.

Dems and progs love criminals.
 
Back
Top Bottom