Concerning Musk & His Underlings Having Access to the Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI) & Financial Data

[ThisIsMe]

Where is the flow chart info coming from then?

No, they're gathering evidence.

What flow chart?

 

[Delldude]

What flow chart?

Been several already, show up on X and other venues.

There's a website with what's been found.

 

[Dragonlady]

The conclusion resonated with me so much that I'm going to lead with it and list the "WHY" afterwards:

​

Final Thoughts​

In any reputable tech company, C-suite executives do NOT have unrestricted access to PII, financial data, or PHI because it creates legal, ethical, and security risks. The fact that Elon Musk and his team may have access to such data without regulatory safeguards should alarm both users and compliance experts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

​

Elon Musk and others associated with X (formerly Twitter) having access to Personally Identifiable Information (PII), financial data, and Protected Health Information (PHI) is a serious security and privacy concern for several reasons:​

​

1. Lack of Verified Security Clearance​

We do not know whether Musk or any of his associates have undergone the necessary security vetting or background checks required for handling sensitive data. Typically, entities dealing with PII, financial data, or PHI must adhere to strict compliance standards, such as:​

​

• HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) – for PHI in the U.S.
• GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) – for financial institutions handling sensitive consumer data.
• GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) – for data protection in the EU.
• CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) – for consumer data privacy in California.

Without proper clearances and training in data security, there is a high risk of misuse, unauthorized access, or data breaches.​

​

---

2. Conflict of Interest & Ethical Risks​

Elon Musk has repeatedly shown impulsivity in decision-making, including publicly sharing internal documents, emails, and DMs without redacting personal details. If he (or close associates) personally access user data, it raises questions about:​

​

• Potential abuse – Could data be used to target critics or competitors?
• Insider trading – Financial information could be leveraged for personal or business gain.
• Selective enforcement – Could private data be used to retaliate against individuals or organizations Musk dislikes?

A billionaire CEO with direct access to sensitive data creates an enormous power imbalance with zero oversight.​

​

---

3. Legal & Compliance Violations​

Many organizations separate executives from direct data access because of compliance mandates that enforce least privilege access and data protection controls. If Musk and his team have unrestricted access to X’s sensitive data, it likely violates:​

​

• HIPAA Compliance (if X handles health-related data via DMs or Spaces).
• Financial Data Protections (e.g., users paying for X Premium via stored payment info).
• Privacy Laws (CCPA, GDPR) that require companies to restrict access only to essential personnel.

Violations could lead to massive fines, lawsuits, and government investigations.​

​

---

4. Security Risks & Potential for Breach​

If sensitive data is accessible without strong internal controls, this dramatically increases risk of:​

​

• Data leaks – If internal systems lack audit logs or access restrictions.
• Hacking incidents – If Musk or others with access use insecure devices.
• State actor exploitation – If Musk collaborates with foreign governments (e.g., China, Saudi Arabia), personal data could be misused.

With no external oversight of X’s security measures, the risk of intentional or unintentional data exposure is alarmingly high.​

​

---

5. Trust & Reputation Damage​

Big Tech platforms rely on public trust to operate. If users believe their PII, financial data, or PHI can be accessed at the whim of a billionaire CEO, they may:​

​

• Stop using X for private communications.
• Withdraw financial data from the platform.
• Report X to regulators or initiate lawsuits.

A lack of transparency on who can access user data weakens the credibility of any company, especially when that company is already under scrutiny.​

​

---

https://www.theverge.com/policy/606567/elon-musk-government-takeover-protest-doge?utm_source=chatgpt.com​

The Wall Street Journal did a deep dive on Musk’s merry little band of hackers, some of whom have criminal records for cyber crimes, and ties to Russia. One who posted he was “racist before it was cool” has already resigned.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/doge-staffer-resigns-over-racist-posts-d9f11a93

 

[Delldude]

The Wall Street Journal did a deep dive on Musk’s merry little band of hackers, some of whom have criminal records for cyber crimes, and ties to Russia. One who posted he was “racist before it was cool” has already resigned.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/doge-staffer-resigns-over-racist-posts-d9f11a93

You clowns have Pocahontas why can't we have Big Ball's???

 

[ThisIsMe]

Been several already, show up on X and other venues.

There's a website with what's been found.

Haven't seen them. I'm responding to the substack link you posted. THAT person was just writing a short story.

 

[Delldude]

Haven't seen them. I'm responding to the substack link you posted. THAT person was just writing a short story.

His claim is based on truth.
Everything in it parallels with what's been revealed.

 

[konradv]

Lol, it's not woke, I just see these things. Leftys who say they are for gay people, but often use negative terms for gay people, or who are for trans rights, and use the slurs for trans people.


I just find it ironic that they do this, which means, what are they saying in private, to their close friends?

Woke, woke, WOKE….

 

[Delldude]

Woke, woke, WOKE….

Yeah, that's the joke.

 

[konradv]

Yeah, that's the joke.

Trump is the joke. He thinks he turned on a spigot to send water to SoCal!

 

[ThisIsMe]

Woke, woke, WOKE….

Well, I am having my morning coffee..so, as the saying goes "I'm awake but not woke"

 

[Billiejeens]

All reasonable concerns.

So far there has been no sign of abuse.

I agree there is some risk.

How can I say this - in health care, the software testers require access to PHI. It is necessary to test the systems.

It is possible that one of them could be offered money for the medical records when Lindsey Lohan goes to rehab.

But any such breach would be instantly discovered.

Ordinarily in government this would be the job of the FBI. Which is in disarray at the moment, and PII is not exactly their highest priority.

However there are other eyes on this too. If anything leaks you can be sure it will be exposed. Which doesn't solve the problem, but serves as a sword of Damocles and a deterrent.

I was wondering how all the left-wing lunatics came up with this shit.

Seems CNN and MSNBC set aside any differences that they may have and together went wall to wall with these talking points yesterday.

It was full panic mode.

 

[TimFitz]

Bullshit!

Musk was never vetted. He never swore an oath to the Constitution.

And, as a foreign national, he is legally barred from having a security clearance.

 

[Delldude]

Trump is the joke. He thinks he turned on a spigot to send water to SoCal!

Yeah, the joke is Newsom jumped all over it and did what Trump said.

 

[TimFitz]

I don’t want them reading my shit.

Much less selling it.

 

[TimFitz]

Well, first, who told you he was reading your information? Just because he has access, this does not automatically assume he is snooping through your personal files. Like...there are 335 million people in America...chances are, he's not really concerned with any person in particular.

Maybe, he really is just looking to stamp out waste?

He and his 20 something lackeys are sifting through it.

They’ll sell it.

And you cheer for it.

Are you going to cheer when Trash Patel tries to turn the FBI into a political police to persecute anyone on Trump’s list?

If you are, I have a brown shirt with an armband that should fit perfectly.

 

[TimFitz]

The DOGE team "having access to personal information" is a nothing burger. All our SSNs have been hacked or put on the dark web at one time or another. They were busy uncovering Democrat corruption and not interested in using our information to make purchases on Amazon.

So, let me get this straight.

An imaginary Dark web broke the law and stole your private personal information.

Which, in your mind, justifies Trump and amuse doing the same thing.

Got it.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[DBA]

He will sell it.

Why, because he needs more money?

 

[DBA]

They're selling policies and ideas that conservatives would absolutely reject if the same idea was proposed by a Democrat.

What policies and ideas? Cutting the size of government is certainly not an idea with which conservatives would disagree.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Damn, why are leftist broads so fugly?