Conservative Leaders Call on Kristen Clarke to Resign for Lying About Her Arrest and Weaponizing the DOJ

She blatantly lied in 2021. IOW, she perjured herself.

Not only does she need to be removed, she needs to be charges with perjury and misleading Congress and the American people.

Rat leftoid bigot liar.



A group of conservative leaders is calling on the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Kristen Clarke, to resign from her leadership position following an explosive report from The Daily Signal.

“The American people have lost trust in your ability to lead the Civil Rights Division,” reads a letter to Clarke, signed by Advancing American Freedom Executive Director Paul Teller, American Accountability Foundation President Tom Jones, Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins, and CatholicVote President Brian Burch. “We request that you resign immediately.”

The Daily Signal published a report on Tuesday highlighting evidence that Clarke had not disclosed a 2006 arrest and subsequent expungement during her 2021 nomination to the DOJ—and then explicitly denied ever having been arrested to Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton.

Clarke has not responded to requests for comment from The Daily Signal, though the DOJ acknowledged receipt of these requests. She did speak to CNN on Wednesday, however, confirming that she did not disclose the arrest and expungement and alleging that her ex-husband Reginald Avery domestically abused her. He denied this in a statement to The Daily Signal.

The letter to Clarke from conservative leaders, sent Friday to the DOJ official, repeatedly references The Daily Signal’s reporting and attaches a copy of the Tuesday report itself. The letter also points to Clarke’s enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act against pro-life activists.

“The American people deserve a Civil Rights Division at the U.S. Department of Justice led with honesty and integrity,” the letter says. “Since taking over the Civil Rights Division, you have weaponized the Department of Justice by wielding the FACE Act against pro-life Americans in an unprecedented manner—even while standing idly by as churches and pro-life pregnancy centers are vandalized, and Jewish students are unable to attend class on college campuses.”

Jones, one of the signers of the letter, began digging into Clarke’s background during her nomination process and spoke to Avery around the same time, as The Daily Signal previously reported. Avery told Jones at the time that Clarke attacked him with a knife, slicing his finger to the bone, during a domestic dispute in July 2006.

“The accusations against Kristen Clarke of lying to Congress and domestic violence are deeply troubling,” Jones told The Daily Signal on Friday. “Clearly she does not possess the character or integrity to be in any position of power. She must resign now.”

On Thursday evening, the New York Post Editorial Board similarly called on Clarke to step down in an editorial titled: “Kristen Clarke lied and must step down from the DOJ — NOW.”

Clarke’s now arguing that because the arrest was expunged, she wasn’t required to disclose it to lawmakers,” the NYPost Editorial Board wrote. “That’s precisely the kind of razor-sharp logic that top Biden appointees are known for.”

“Then again,” the board continued. “Clarke’s the same dunderhead who muffed a major question about First Amendment litigation last year, claiming in a congressional hearing to be totally unaware of the lawsuit by the state of Missouri against the president over government efforts against ‘disinformation’ — a huge civil rights issue where Team Biden had lost and was appealing to the Supreme Court.”

The NYPost Editorial Board added: “Her defense now is beyond pathetic. She told an unambiguous lie to Congress. Was she thinking she’d never get caught, or that if she did, her political connections would protect her?”

...


[/QUMike.
Merely being expunged doesn't equal not being arrested.

If she had a Finding of Factual Innocence she could legally claim to have never been arrested.
 
This thread was started by excalibur.

So its fake news.
 
She blatantly lied in 2021. IOW, she perjured herself.

Not only does she need to be removed, she needs to be charges with perjury and misleading Congress and the American people.

Rat leftoid bigot liar.


A group of conservative leaders is calling on the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Kristen Clarke, to resign from her leadership position following an explosive report from The Daily Signal.
“The American people have lost trust in your ability to lead the Civil Rights Division,” reads a letter to Clarke, signed by Advancing American Freedom Executive Director Paul Teller, American Accountability Foundation President Tom Jones, Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins, and CatholicVote President Brian Burch. “We request that you resign immediately.”
The Daily Signal published a report on Tuesday highlighting evidence that Clarke had not disclosed a 2006 arrest and subsequent expungement during her 2021 nomination to the DOJ—and then explicitly denied ever having been arrested to Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton.
Clarke has not responded to requests for comment from The Daily Signal, though the DOJ acknowledged receipt of these requests. She did speak to CNN on Wednesday, however, confirming that she did not disclose the arrest and expungement and alleging that her ex-husband Reginald Avery domestically abused her. He denied this in a statement to The Daily Signal.
The letter to Clarke from conservative leaders, sent Friday to the DOJ official, repeatedly references The Daily Signal’s reporting and attaches a copy of the Tuesday report itself. The letter also points to Clarke’s enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act against pro-life activists.
“The American people deserve a Civil Rights Division at the U.S. Department of Justice led with honesty and integrity,” the letter says. “Since taking over the Civil Rights Division, you have weaponized the Department of Justice by wielding the FACE Act against pro-life Americans in an unprecedented manner—even while standing idly by as churches and pro-life pregnancy centers are vandalized, and Jewish students are unable to attend class on college campuses.”
Jones, one of the signers of the letter, began digging into Clarke’s background during her nomination process and spoke to Avery around the same time, as The Daily Signal previously reported. Avery told Jones at the time that Clarke attacked him with a knife, slicing his finger to the bone, during a domestic dispute in July 2006.
“The accusations against Kristen Clarke of lying to Congress and domestic violence are deeply troubling,” Jones told The Daily Signal on Friday. “Clearly she does not possess the character or integrity to be in any position of power. She must resign now.”
On Thursday evening, the New York Post Editorial Board similarly called on Clarke to step down in an editorial titled: “Kristen Clarke lied and must step down from the DOJ — NOW.”
Clarke’s now arguing that because the arrest was expunged, she wasn’t required to disclose it to lawmakers,” the NYPost Editorial Board wrote. “That’s precisely the kind of razor-sharp logic that top Biden appointees are known for.”
“Then again,” the board continued. “Clarke’s the same dunderhead who muffed a major question about First Amendment litigation last year, claiming in a congressional hearing to be totally unaware of the lawsuit by the state of Missouri against the president over government efforts against ‘disinformation’ — a huge civil rights issue where Team Biden had lost and was appealing to the Supreme Court.”
The NYPost Editorial Board added: “Her defense now is beyond pathetic. She told an unambiguous lie to Congress. Was she thinking she’d never get caught, or that if she did, her political connections would protect her?”
...


under the LAW...

Effect of an Expungement​

An expungement order means a court removes an arrest or conviction from a person's court record for most purposes. After the expungement process is complete, you are not legally required to disclose the incident.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
under the LAW...

Effect of an Expungement​

An expungement order means a court removes an arrest or conviction from a person's court record for most purposes. After the expungement process is complete, you are not legally required to disclose the incident.

Depends on who's asking. Cabinet level appointments are going to require security clearances, so she most likely was required as it was merely an expungement.
 
More idiocy from the idiocracy.
Expunge means it doesn't exist.

It's not surprising that MAGATS don't know this.
After all, "expunge" is two whole syllables.
Nope....
Expunge does not mean that.

You can't expunge something until it does exist.

Expunged means pretending it never happened.
 
Nope....
Expunge does not mean that.

You can't expunge something until it does exist.

Expunged means pretending it never happened.
A distinction without a difference.

IRRELEVANT in this matter

AND

The clearance process already exposed this.
That's what the clearance process does.

Just another MAGAT

Butthurt of the Day
 
A distinction without a difference.

IRRELEVANT in this matter

AND

The clearance process already exposed this.
That's what the clearance process does.

Just another MAGAT

Butthurt of the Day
The distinction makes the difference. There is an enormous difference between something that has happened and later on considered to be of no consequence and something that never happened.
 
The distinction makes the difference. There is an enormous difference between something that has happened and later on considered to be of no consequence and something that never happened.
A distinction without a difference.

It is EXPUNGED meaning
1714915021137.png


It was, therefore irrelevant to the proceeding.

BUT

It does give you another
MAGAT Butthurt of the Day

So celebrate.
1714915126349.gif
 
A distinction without a difference.

It is EXPUNGED meaning
View attachment 942368

It was, therefore irrelevant to the proceeding.

BUT

It does give you another
MAGAT Butthurt of the Day

So celebrate.
View attachment 942371
You're attempt to duck out from underneath your illiiteracy does nothing to rescue you. An expunged criminal record does not mean that the events leading up to it did not happen It only means that the court will no longer look at those events as consequential. The events themselves never actually do get removed from the record They remain on the record under the title expunged.
 
You're attempt to duck out from underneath your illiiteracy does nothing to rescue you. An expunged criminal record does not mean that the events leading up to it did not happen It only means that the court will no longer look at those events as consequential. The events themselves never actually do get removed from the record They remain on the record under the title expunged.
It means the record is IRRELEVANT
It means when asked about it you can respond NO TRUTHFULLY.
TRUTHFULLY there's your issue isn't it?
A Trumpophile is concerned over someone else's honesty.

How's about you clean up your own house
 

Attachments

  • 1714916590009.png
    1714916590009.png
    94.6 KB · Views: 1
It means the record is IRRELEVANT
It means when asked about it you can respond NO TRUTHFULLY.
TRUTHFULLY there's your issue isn't it?
A Trumpophile is concerned over someone else's honesty.

How's about you clean up your own house
It's important to use words the way they were intended to be used. Changing the meaning of words is how you begin the construction of a false narrative. I couldn't care less about Trump's court cases. He's done enough stupid shit in his life where the results were predictable.
 
More idiocy from the idiocracy.
Expunge means it doesn't exist.

It's not surprising that MAGATS don't know this.
After all, "expunge" is two whole syllables.
I disagree

It means its no longer part of the public record

But she was arrested, and that was the question that she lied about under oath
 
I disagree

It means its no longer part of the public record

But she was arrested, and that was the question that she lied about under oath
People would be sorely disappointed to discover that no action done by the police or the court is ever truly expunged. The file might be moved but whenever the record is brought up the events, even the false ones, pop up in front of the judge for his consideration which is patently unfair in my opinion. No event is ever totally taken out of the record on purpose unless someone is paid to do it illegally.
 
I disagree

It means its no longer part of the public record

But she was arrested, and that was the question that she lied about under oath
Apparently this is a matter of opinion.

Therefore it’s not a lie.

People who have been arrested under false pretenses don’t need to have that bullshit following them around.
 

Forum List

Back
Top