Little did he know that Nixon had total immunity for most of what they accused him of doing.Nixon was an unindicted co-conspirator when he was still POTUS. So after he resigned they would have indicted him, and it was known what the allegations would be.
it works for you,,
at least there were a list of crimes he was being accused of,,
Mostly. In fact, the prosecution would have a hard time getting testimony against Nixon given he was discussing these matters with his close advisors which is not allowed in the prosecution of former presidents.
Haven’t seen any evidence here, so there’s nothing for me to dismiss.
Never charged because it was a blanket preemptive pardon.
ignorance is always a lame excuse,,
I have doubts that tape would be admissible because SCOTUS said testimony or private records of the president and his advisors can’t be admitted at trial.
So you want to change the rules again.
by definition there has to at least be a crime to get a pardon,, charge or conviction,,
Pardons are for offenses. The constitution does not say crimes, charges or convictions.
you should really buy dictionary,,
The power of pardon conferred by the Constitution upon the President is unlimited except in cases of impeachment. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment. The power is not subject to legislative control.
And biden says the people he pardoned did nothing wrong.!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes. So?
