Doc91678
Rookie
- Banned
- #1
It seems logical that you cant order businesses to use what doesnt exist, but this is Obamas EPA, whose leader, Lisa Jackson, invented a nonexistent person in order to evade the law.
Via The Daily Caller:
A federal court delivered a serious blow to the Environmental Protection Agencys renewable fuel agenda, ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by mandating refiners use cellulosic biofuels, which isnt commercially available.
The court added that the cellulosic biofuels program punished refiners for the failure of producers to make enough biofuel to meet the EPAs mandate.
Here, by contrast, EPA applies the pressure to one industry (the refiners), yet it is another (the producers of cellulosic biofuel) that enjoys the requisite expertise, plant, capital and ultimate opportunity for profit, reads the decision. Apart from their role as captive consumers, the refiners are in no position to ensure, or even contribute to, growth in the cellulosic biofuel industry.
Do a good job, cellulosic fuel producers. If you fail, well fine your customers, the decision says.
***snip***
Continue reading: --->
Judge rules EPA can?t mandate use of nonexistent biofuels | The Daily Caller
Via The Daily Caller:
A federal court delivered a serious blow to the Environmental Protection Agencys renewable fuel agenda, ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by mandating refiners use cellulosic biofuels, which isnt commercially available.
The court sided with the countrys chief oil and gas lobby, the American Petroleum Institute, in striking down the 2012 EPA mandate that would have forced refineries to purchase more than $8 million in credits for 8.65 million of gallons of the cellulosic biofuel. However, none of the biofuel is commercially available.
[W]e agree with API that EPAs 2012 projection of cellulosic biofuel production was in excess of the agencys statutory authority, reads the court decision.
API said refiners were forced to purchase biofuel credits for nonexistent gallons of cellulosic biofuel to meet the EPAs mandate, reports the Hill.
We are glad the court has put a stop to EPAs pattern of setting impossible mandates for a biofuel that does not even exist, API Group Downstream Director Bob Greco said in a statement. This absurd mandate acts as a stealth tax on gasoline with no environmental benefit that could have ultimately burdened consumers
[W]e agree with API that EPAs 2012 projection of cellulosic biofuel production was in excess of the agencys statutory authority, reads the court decision.
API said refiners were forced to purchase biofuel credits for nonexistent gallons of cellulosic biofuel to meet the EPAs mandate, reports the Hill.
We are glad the court has put a stop to EPAs pattern of setting impossible mandates for a biofuel that does not even exist, API Group Downstream Director Bob Greco said in a statement. This absurd mandate acts as a stealth tax on gasoline with no environmental benefit that could have ultimately burdened consumers
The court added that the cellulosic biofuels program punished refiners for the failure of producers to make enough biofuel to meet the EPAs mandate.
Here, by contrast, EPA applies the pressure to one industry (the refiners), yet it is another (the producers of cellulosic biofuel) that enjoys the requisite expertise, plant, capital and ultimate opportunity for profit, reads the decision. Apart from their role as captive consumers, the refiners are in no position to ensure, or even contribute to, growth in the cellulosic biofuel industry.
Do a good job, cellulosic fuel producers. If you fail, well fine your customers, the decision says.
***snip***
Continue reading: --->
Judge rules EPA can?t mandate use of nonexistent biofuels | The Daily Caller