Dahleen Glanton: What we’re getting wrong about Juneteenth

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,258
34,677
2,290
Actual history, not phony, made up Democratic Party BS.


...

Juneteenth does not represent the end of slavery in America, as it is often erroneously reported. It specifically notes the end of slavery in Texas. Slavery continued to thrive in several border states that were not affected by the Emancipation Proclamation. Delaware was the last to free its nearly 2,000 slaves on Dec. 6, 1865, six months after Texas.​
Dec. 6 would be the most accurate date to celebrate the end of slavery. That’s when the 13th Amendment was ratified in 1865, officially abolishing slavery throughout the United States. Every state was then required by federal law to free its slaves.​
There is no historical reason to make June 19 a federal holiday or even a state holiday anywhere other than in Texas. It does, however, allow for a good summer celebration. And it’s better than no commemoration at all.​
...​




 
"ignorance = lack of knowledge - being unaware of information



The Smithsonian has the info:


"Juneteenth marks our country’s second independence day. Although it has long celebrated in the African American community, this monumental event remains largely unknown to most Americans."


"The historical legacy of Juneteenth shows the value of never giving up hope in uncertain times. The National Museum of African American History and Culture is a community space where this spirit of hope lives on. A place where historical events like Juneteenth are shared and new stories with equal urgency are told."


 
I vigorously object to the date of Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation as the reference date for the end of slavery.

The EP had NO LEGAL EFFECT. It was a nullity, and created for purely propagantistic purposes, so signify to the English that the U.S. was unwaveringly opposed to slavery and would end it, and to enslaved people who might hear of it. Consider:

  • There is no such thing as a "proclamation" in American Constitutional law.
  • Are we all aware that the slaves in the four Border States were not freed by the EP? Only slaves in the states "in rebellion."
  • Lincoln had no power whatsoever in the Confederate States of America. It is as though the President today proclaimed that all cars in Canada must be painted green. Meaningless.
  • The slaves were PROPERTY under the law, and Lincoln would have had to COMPENSATE the slave owners for the expropriation of their human property. This was never even envisioned.
  • There is no Article II power even remotely covering such an outrageous usurpation of power.
  • If the EP had been effective, there would have been no reason to pass the 13th Amendment.
While it is interesting and sad to note that some slaves were not actually freed with the others, Juneteenth is a queer date to choose for a celebration of the end of slavery.
 
It really just ended slavery in Galveston, TX. It takes time to change a few million people from being hard working chattel, into free people. The speech in Galveston told the slaves to keep working where you are, but for money (not enforced) because they enforced vagrancy laws back then. Actually until about 40 years ago.

 
I vigorously object to the date of Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation as the reference date for the end of slavery.

The EP had NO LEGAL EFFECT. It was a nullity, and created for purely propagantistic purposes, so signify to the English that the U.S. was unwaveringly opposed to slavery and would end it, and to enslaved people who might hear of it. Consider:

  • There is no such thing as a "proclamation" in American Constitutional law.
  • Are we all aware that the slaves in the four Border States were not freed by the EP? Only slaves in the states "in rebellion."
  • Lincoln had no power whatsoever in the Confederate States of America. It is as though the President today proclaimed that all cars in Canada must be painted green. Meaningless.
  • The slaves were PROPERTY under the law, and Lincoln would have had to COMPENSATE the slave owners for the expropriation of their human property. This was never even envisioned.
  • There is no Article II power even remotely covering such an outrageous usurpation of power.
  • If the EP had been effective, there would have been no reason to pass the 13th Amendment.
While it is interesting and sad to note that some slaves were not actually freed with the others, Juneteenth is a queer date to choose for a celebration of the end of slavery.
Nice opinion cracker.
 
"ignorance = lack of knowledge - being unaware of information

The Smithsonian has the info:

"Juneteenth marks our country’s second independence day. Although it has long celebrated in the African American community, this monumental event remains largely unknown to most Americans."

"The historical legacy of Juneteenth shows the value of never giving up hope in uncertain times. The National Museum of African American History and Culture is a community space where this spirit of hope lives on. A place where historical events like Juneteenth are shared and new stories with equal urgency are told."

this is not fake info
 
I vigorously object to the date of Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation as the reference date for the end of slavery.

The EP had NO LEGAL EFFECT. It was a nullity, and created for purely propagantistic purposes, so signify to the English that the U.S. was unwaveringly opposed to slavery and would end it, and to enslaved people who might hear of it. Consider:

  • There is no such thing as a "proclamation" in American Constitutional law.
  • Are we all aware that the slaves in the four Border States were not freed by the EP? Only slaves in the states "in rebellion."
  • Lincoln had no power whatsoever in the Confederate States of America. It is as though the President today proclaimed that all cars in Canada must be painted green. Meaningless.
  • The slaves were PROPERTY under the law, and Lincoln would have had to COMPENSATE the slave owners for the expropriation of their human property. This was never even envisioned.
  • There is no Article II power even remotely covering such an outrageous usurpation of power.
  • If the EP had been effective, there woslavery is over' atually end slavery on teh date signed? uld have been no reason to pass the 13th Amendment.
While it is interesting and sad to note that some slaves were not actually freed with the others, Juneteenth is a queer date to choose for a celebration of the end of slavery.
Would a legal judgement, a law stating 'Slavery is over' actually stop all slavery on the date it was signed into law? legally, yes. In reality no.

SO could you spell out in more precise language wtf you are trying to claim?
 

Forum List

Back
Top