Darn those pesky facts.

Ok, this is a reasonable response.
I appreciate it.

Q: Would have earners of over 176K, paying into the ss system, to a number like 500K, help solve the SS problem? We can discuss the extent...... but would this help solve the 2034 SS Problem, If earners beyond 170K continued to contribute, up to 500K, regardless of fairness?
I don't know. There are about 1.4M people at the 500K market, and those alone wouldn't solve it. But, there are a number of people in each income bracket between 176K to 500K. It wouldn't be easy to calculate the amount of additional taxes that would be gained unless you knew how many people of what income are in each bracket.

It's possible there are tens of millions in the 200K, 300K, and 400K.

There is one website that says there are 12M households that make 250K or more, but without knowing how that breaks down as far as # of people in each income bracket, it would be hard to figure.

It's very likely it might solve the problem. The question is, is it right?
 
I collect SS. The tax on it amounts to just over… nothing… unless you make a lot of money… as noted above


A dime is just over nothing, hundreds of dollars, not so much.

.
 
Are the SS & Medicare deductions taken after taxes or before taxes??
They are, by definition, taxes. They are taken out of your pay the same time as your income tax.

The money withheld for FICA taxes is invested and grows over time. You take out more than you put in, and that's why Social Security is taxed. Kind of like a capital gains tax.
 
Floor is yours.

Please explain with actual DATA/FACTS


God only knows how long this has been going on.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. government clawed back more than $31 million in federal payments that improperly went to dead people, a recovery that one official said Wednesday was “just the tip of the iceberg.”


.
 
For some high-income households, the policy change may result in gains of up to $100,000 over their lifetimes, the research also found.
Higher-income people pay higher FICA taxes. So of course they would save the most if benefits were not taxed. That's just common sense.

Nevertheless, this $100,000 figure does not pass the sniff test. I read the links. A person could retire at 70 (the maximum age for Social Security benefits) and live to be 90 years old and still would not come out ahead $100,000.

According to your link, the maximum savings in 2026 would be $2,450 per year. Not per month. Per year.

It goes up a little bit each year until 2054 when the maximum savings reaches $5,080 per year.

Do the math and see how many years it takes to come out ahead by $100,000 in total.


Yet, individuals under age 30 — and particularly people who have not yet been born — may face the largest losses as the federal debt increases and incentives to work and save for retirement decline, it found.
Gee, if only our politicians and voters gave a shit about the federal debt before now!
 
FOLKS, SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS BEING TAX EXEMPT IS THE TOPIC, STAY ON IT, OR BE ELSEWHERE

DONT REPLY TO OFF TOPIC POSTS, REPORT THEM

MANY OFF TOPIC POSTS DELETED AND 2 THREAD BANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED, COULD BE MORE TO COME
 
No additional benefits for the extra pay into the system.
I know you hate it, but it's best for MAGA.

I never mentioned an increase in benefit, I only said raise the CAP to a much higher amount.
You hate it, I love it.
It's about saving America more than protecting the Ultra Rich from a few dollars.


Benefits are based on what you pay, otherwise it's just theft.

.
 

Trump’s plan to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits would help high-income households, report finds​


On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump touted a plan to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits.

Now that he’s in the White House, Trump administration officials told CNBC.com last week that the president “doubles down” on that promise.


A bill to eliminate those levies — the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act — was recently reintroduced in the House.

Yet, nixing taxes on Social Security benefits may reduce U.S. government revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase the federal debt by 7% by 2054, according to a new analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan, research-based project at the University of Pennsylvania.

For some high-income households, the policy change may result in gains of up to $100,000 over their lifetimes, the research also found. Yet, individuals under age 30 — and particularly people who have not yet been born — may face the largest losses as the federal debt increases and incentives to work and save for retirement decline, it found.


Good to know the rich will better be able to afford the high price of eggs trump said he would lower on day one.

Many ways of taking money from poor people and funnelling it to your rich friends
 
I don't make that much, close but not 176K
I'm talking about people that make 400K, 1M, 2M, 10M, etc.

Thoughts on saving SS?


How about we stop paying benefits to people that haven't earned them.

.
 
Why should the rich have to pay in more to receive less?

As it stands, SS is cut off at 170K for the rich? Which means they receive very little from SS. They basically don't participate. You want them to pay SS on their total income, but receive almost nothing for it

Being rich isn't necessarily an evil thing...

I'm not protecting the rich, I just don't subscribe to the wealth redistribution model.
No it doesn't mean they receive very little. If they maxed out their contributions for forty quarters, they are drawing over four grand a month, that ain't "very little" to most Americans. And it is more than twice the average workers Social Security check.

Do some wealthy people pay very little into Social Security? Sure, capital gains are not subject to the Social Security tax. Matter of fact, 17% of all income is not subject to the Social Security tax. Who do you think is making that 17%?

The reality is, that for a huge percentage of Americans, the Social Security tax makes up the bulk of their tax expense. They pay very little, if any, income tax. Just to be frank, the six plus percent the average worker pays is far more painful than the pittance percentage the seven figure a year earner pays. The Social Security tax is a regressive tax. Combine that fact with the reality, that every single state in the union has a regressive tax system, usually a combination of income, sales, and property taxes, and it is pretty easy to figure out just who our tax system was made for.

So hell, I will do you one better. Remove the cap on income subject to the tax, remove the exemption for capital gains, and not only, keep the cap on benefits, make the damn benefits mean tested.
 
No it doesn't mean they receive very little. If they maxed out their contributions for forty quarters, they are drawing over four grand a month, that ain't "very little" to most Americans. And it is more than twice the average workers Social Security check.

Do some wealthy people pay very little into Social Security? Sure, capital gains are not subject to the Social Security tax. Matter of fact, 17% of all income is not subject to the Social Security tax. Who do you think is making that 17%?

The reality is, that for a huge percentage of Americans, the Social Security tax makes up the bulk of their tax expense. They pay very little, if any, income tax. Just to be frank, the six plus percent the average worker pays is far more painful than the pittance percentage the seven figure a year earner pays. The Social Security tax is a regressive tax. Combine that fact with the reality, that every single state in the union has a regressive tax system, usually a combination of income, sales, and property taxes, and it is pretty easy to figure out just who our tax system was made for.

So hell, I will do you one better. Remove the cap on income subject to the tax, remove the exemption for capital gains, and not only, keep the cap on benefits, make the damn benefits mean tested.

No it doesn't mean they receive very little. If they maxed out their contributions for forty quarters, they are drawing over four grand a month,

Benefits are based on 140 quarters.

Just to be frank, the six plus percent the average worker pays is far more painful than the pittance percentage the seven figure a year earner pays.

And their benefit is more helpful.
 

Trump’s plan to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits would help high-income households, report finds​


On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump touted a plan to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits.

Now that he’s in the White House, Trump administration officials told CNBC.com last week that the president “doubles down” on that promise.


A bill to eliminate those levies — the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act — was recently reintroduced in the House.

Yet, nixing taxes on Social Security benefits may reduce U.S. government revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase the federal debt by 7% by 2054, according to a new analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan, research-based project at the University of Pennsylvania.

For some high-income households, the policy change may result in gains of up to $100,000 over their lifetimes, the research also found. Yet, individuals under age 30 — and particularly people who have not yet been born — may face the largest losses as the federal debt increases and incentives to work and save for retirement decline, it found.


Good to know the rich will better be able to afford the high price of eggs trump said he would lower on day one.
2054?


:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
First, that tax comes out on first dollar. There ain't no deductions.

If your employer has an HSA payroll deduction option, that is a deduction before Social Security taxes.

And if you are self-employed, well you pay the total amount, not half, like workers do.

Do you want them to get the same benefit for half the contribution?

And it is the working class that pay the bulk of the premiums, while it is the wealthy that derive the bulk of the benefits.

Wrong.
As to the later. Yes, the working class pay the bulk of premiums. I mean the income subject to the tax is capped, but what percentage of workers exceed that cap? It is pretty small, so that small percentage is not the "bulk of the taxes paid". It is intuitive. And yes, those high income workers get the most benefit. Run the numbers, I have. For every dollar a worker puts in, they get back more than two from Social Security, of course, that is on the average. So those high income workers, they are paying more dollars in, per person, not total, and therefore getting more dollars out. Again, it is intuitive. Then there is life expectancy. Poor people die before they ever collect, rich people hang around damn near forever, all the time collecting that higher monthly social security check. It is a total scam.

But the HSA, well no shit Sherlock. Same for a 401K, health insurance premiums, or even an FSA. But that is just another example of how the working man is getting fucked. You go ahead, fund that HSA, stay healthy, save on the tax bill, temporarily. Invest the excess, it grows tax-deferred, not tax free. But when you sell those investments at a profit, it is not a capital gain, it is income, and yes, subject to the Social Security tax and the income tax. It is a fool's play.

Wealthy person. First, they probably running with a hundred thousand dollar deductible on the health insurance. Corporations kind of do the same thing when they claim they are self-insured. They are, to a point, but they pay an administrator that also acts as a reinsurer against losses that exceed a certain level, usually in the millions of dollars. They don't have an HSA. They have a Roth, funded to the maximum level. Then they have an investment account, a hundred grand set aside in bonds to pay that deductible, investing the rest.

Within the Roth, well gains are none yah, that is what I call them, none yah government's business. No taxes, of any kind. But within the investment account. Those gains are capital gains. No Social Security tax. And damn, probably paying a lower tax rate than income on the long term capital gains.

Two people doing exactly the same damn thing. Buying low, selling high, period. The same damn thing. One person, well they made that investment with "Qualified" money, it hasn't been taxed yet. The other paid the taxes and "invested" the money. When the one with the qualified money takes profits, well he pays Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and his normal personal income tax rate, on the proceeds. The other person, well for what he has in the Roth, he doesn't pay jackshit to anyone. And just a side note here, half my kids are maximizing their Roth contributions every year. Two out of the three are under 30. One company actually matches a Roth contribution, and pays the taxes.
.
But even within the investment account, that other person only pays capital gains taxes, and a Medicare tax, which is actually rather recent. I think Obama did it in his first two years. Just going by memory here. I mean come on. The whole system needs to be torched and rebuilt from scratch. And if there ever was a canary falling over dead in a coal mine, well when Trump starts calling "tariffs" the most beautiful word, damn skippy, the canary that is the working man, Joe Sixpack, just fell over dead.

I am happy that Trump is jumping out like a freight train about to careen off the rails. Courts are at full-stop, but it makes no never mind. It was all anticipated, doesn't matter. Trump is all about, "make them stop me". And I am not even going to argue with the efficiency and the results. I can give credit.
,
But it is a short-term thing hoss. It really is. It is almost like Trump and his supporters feel like a wedding crasher. I mean they are feasting at the buffet, they know they are going to get busted, but damn, they is hungry.
 
No it doesn't mean they receive very little. If they maxed out their contributions for forty quarters, they are drawing over four grand a month, that ain't "very little" to most Americans. And it is more than twice the average workers Social Security check.

Do some wealthy people pay very little into Social Security? Sure, capital gains are not subject to the Social Security tax. Matter of fact, 17% of all income is not subject to the Social Security tax. Who do you think is making that 17%?

The reality is, that for a huge percentage of Americans, the Social Security tax makes up the bulk of their tax expense. They pay very little, if any, income tax. Just to be frank, the six plus percent the average worker pays is far more painful than the pittance percentage the seven figure a year earner pays. The Social Security tax is a regressive tax. Combine that fact with the reality, that every single state in the union has a regressive tax system, usually a combination of income, sales, and property taxes, and it is pretty easy to figure out just who our tax system was made for.

So hell, I will do you one better. Remove the cap on income subject to the tax, remove the exemption for capital gains, and not only, keep the cap on benefits, make the damn benefits mean tested.
I think winco was suggesting they pay SS on income up to 500K, but only receive payout based on taxes collected on 170K.
 
It’s always amusing to see bug.80 pretending to discuss “facts.”
 
How about stop paying benefits to people that don't need them?


So you're saying the Constitution and equal treatment under the law is meaningless to you, GOT IT!!!!

.
 
As to the later. Yes, the working class pay the bulk of premiums. I mean the income subject to the tax is capped, but what percentage of workers exceed that cap? It is pretty small, so that small percentage is not the "bulk of the taxes paid". It is intuitive. And yes, those high income workers get the most benefit. Run the numbers, I have. For every dollar a worker puts in, they get back more than two from Social Security, of course, that is on the average. So those high income workers, they are paying more dollars in, per person, not total, and therefore getting more dollars out. Again, it is intuitive. Then there is life expectancy. Poor people die before they ever collect, rich people hang around damn near forever, all the time collecting that higher monthly social security check. It is a total scam.

But the HSA, well no shit Sherlock. Same for a 401K, health insurance premiums, or even an FSA. But that is just another example of how the working man is getting fucked. You go ahead, fund that HSA, stay healthy, save on the tax bill, temporarily. Invest the excess, it grows tax-deferred, not tax free. But when you sell those investments at a profit, it is not a capital gain, it is income, and yes, subject to the Social Security tax and the income tax. It is a fool's play.

Wealthy person. First, they probably running with a hundred thousand dollar deductible on the health insurance. Corporations kind of do the same thing when they claim they are self-insured. They are, to a point, but they pay an administrator that also acts as a reinsurer against losses that exceed a certain level, usually in the millions of dollars. They don't have an HSA. They have a Roth, funded to the maximum level. Then they have an investment account, a hundred grand set aside in bonds to pay that deductible, investing the rest.

Within the Roth, well gains are none yah, that is what I call them, none yah government's business. No taxes, of any kind. But within the investment account. Those gains are capital gains. No Social Security tax. And damn, probably paying a lower tax rate than income on the long term capital gains.

Two people doing exactly the same damn thing. Buying low, selling high, period. The same damn thing. One person, well they made that investment with "Qualified" money, it hasn't been taxed yet. The other paid the taxes and "invested" the money. When the one with the qualified money takes profits, well he pays Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and his normal personal income tax rate, on the proceeds. The other person, well for what he has in the Roth, he doesn't pay jackshit to anyone. And just a side note here, half my kids are maximizing their Roth contributions every year. Two out of the three are under 30. One company actually matches a Roth contribution, and pays the taxes.
.
But even within the investment account, that other person only pays capital gains taxes, and a Medicare tax, which is actually rather recent. I think Obama did it in his first two years. Just going by memory here. I mean come on. The whole system needs to be torched and rebuilt from scratch. And if there ever was a canary falling over dead in a coal mine, well when Trump starts calling "tariffs" the most beautiful word, damn skippy, the canary that is the working man, Joe Sixpack, just fell over dead.

I am happy that Trump is jumping out like a freight train about to careen off the rails. Courts are at full-stop, but it makes no never mind. It was all anticipated, doesn't matter. Trump is all about, "make them stop me". And I am not even going to argue with the efficiency and the results. I can give credit.
,
But it is a short-term thing hoss. It really is. It is almost like Trump and his supporters feel like a wedding crasher. I mean they are feasting at the buffet, they know they are going to get busted, but damn, they is hungry.

As to the later. Yes, the working class pay the bulk of premiums.

They get the bulk of the benefits too.

For every dollar a worker puts in, they get back more than two from Social Security,

Lower income workers get more out, higher income workers get less out.

rich people hang around damn near forever, all the time collecting that higher monthly social security check.

And they pay higher taxes on those higher benefits. Taxes that go back into the fund.

But the HSA, well no shit Sherlock.

I'm happy to educate you.

You go ahead, fund that HSA, stay healthy, save on the tax bill, temporarily. Invest the excess, it grows tax-deferred, not tax free. But when you sell those investments at a profit, it is not a capital gain, it is income, and yes, subject to the Social Security tax and the income tax. It is a fool's play.

You pay taxes when you spend your HSA money? LOL!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom