Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 35,092
- 23,153
- 1,845
Democrats think that governments have unlimited authority to do whatever they want so naturally they don't understand what an "unofficial act" is.
That actually makes sense.
Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats think that governments have unlimited authority to do whatever they want so naturally they don't understand what an "unofficial act" is.
you all are the morons that think calling the SOS of a state and asking them to find a specific number of vote so he could win the state is an official act.
you fuckers have no room to talk
That never happened.
Well they did not give him absolute immunity
For some presidential powers, those most loosely connected to the office, immunity is a “rebuttable presumption” and for “unofficial” acts, perhaps inciting a mob to storm the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, the justices offer even less protection.
Evidence that supports Inciting a riot is not an official presidential act.
If the president had absolute immunity then how can congress impeach him and remove him from office.
- There are two types of rebuttable presumptions: prima facie and conclusive. A prima facie presumption is one that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary. A conclusive presumption, on the other hand, cannot be overcome with evidence. Once a conclusive presumption is in place, it is assumed to be true no matter what.
That means lower courts will have a chance to determine the facts of the cases and make rulings about whether Trump should face a criminal trial for his attempt to overthrow the democratic election of 2020.
Yeah the SC avoided that land mine.
the Constitution plainly contemplates the criminal prosecution of a president for wrongdoing when it says the process of impeachment does not protect anyone covered by the impeachment clause from future criminal liability. That includes presidents.
![]()
Supreme Court betrays conservatism with disastrous Trump presidential immunity ruling | Opinion
History will judge harshly the anti-constitutional decision that rejects originalist legal thinking. | Opinionwww.yahoo.com
there is a fucking recording of it you moron.
I never said that was an official act. Please see Article II of the US Constitution for official acts of the President. BTW, Trump never asked the SOS to fudge numbers or manufacture fake ballots.you all are the morons that think calling the SOS of a state and asking them to find a specific number of vote so he could win the state is an official act.
you fuckers have no room to talk
there is a fucking recording of it you moron.
Progressives openly embrace their Inner MaoWe knew they felt this way, now they're on the record admitting it.
Not a good day for our country.
This first nutter shares Joe Biden's and Eric Swalwell's sick fantasy of nuking Americans who disagree with them:
View attachment 970086
View attachment 970084
View attachment 970075
View attachment 970076
View attachment 970077
View attachment 970079
View attachment 970080
They are losing hard and handling it as poorly as one might imagine.
We have long memory.
So does the internet.
.
.
Come and enjoy flyover country. My small town is about 90% armed, 100% pissed off and prepped for a good long time.
.
My suspicion is that out here the populace is better armed, and better trained.
What was lacking was the resolve to fix things by force.
That is over.
Nope. Then answer the question I asked.That's dangerous knowledge for you and the other violent loons, as we see from the messages I posted.
Do you support Biden executing Trump and all the conservative SCOTUS justices, as your fellow DemoKKKrats above are suggesting?
In their defense...they've had a tough week.Good grief. Just good grief, they're as whacked as this forum's leftists
.My suspicion is that out here the populace is better armed, and better trained.
What was lacking was the resolve to fix things by force.
That is over.
So you’re ready to go a murdering?My suspicion is that out here the populace is better armed, and better trained.
What was lacking was the resolve to fix things by force.
That is over.
Who the hell is Bradley Moss? Did we really need a decision from the Supreme Court affirming the fact that democrats can't turn the U.S. into a Banana Republic?
So you’re ready to go a murdering?
The president DID ORDER THE MILITARY TO EXECUTE AMERICANS, a father & his son, neither of whom was charged with perpetrating any crimes inside the United States, that murderous presidents name is Barack Hussein Obama!We knew they felt this way, now they're on the record admitting it.
Not a good day for our country.
This first nutter shares Joe Biden's and Eric Swalwell's sick fantasy of nuking Americans who disagree with them:
View attachment 970086
View attachment 970084
View attachment 970075
View attachment 970076
View attachment 970077
View attachment 970079
View attachment 970080