DHS prosecuting criminal leakers

[j-mac]

Still waiting on Trump to get us out of Afghanistan (which I said he never would)

Still waiting on the release of the Kennedy assassination papers (which I said wouldn't be released)

Still waiting on the "rich to pay their fair share" (which I said the Democrats would never do.)

I have more.

You should call your congress critter and fin out what the hold up is…Not that a narcissist like you would listen anyway.

 

[kyzr]

where is the line crossed from whistleblower to traitor is my Q kyzr.....~S~

Tough one.

Passing out "classified information" means that someone wants that info protected, generally to save US lives.
1. Giving cartel gangs a heads-up that an ICE or FBI raid is coming is obviously criminal.
2. Snowden telling us that the NSA is spying on us seems more legitimate to me, yet it gives criminals/spys a heads-up that their phone conversations may not be private.
3. Reality Winner released an NSA report that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election. That was damaging to the US since Russia knows NSA means and methods. She is obviously a political hack, there was no public benefit to that release.
4. Vindman's blabbing about a "perfect phone call" led to an impeachment and the successful Biden coverup.
5. Wikileaks publishes anything. Not good.

WikiLeaks

wikileaks.org

So to answer your question, it depends on the released material, and who it damages.

 

[pknopp]

Pentagon announces investigation into leaks that could include lie detector tests

Polygraph tests were also used by the Department of Homeland Security to identify potential leakers.

www.cbsnews.com

Still just talking about an investigation with absolutely no specifics or names on who it was supposedly charged.

There was no one. The leaks if any were intentional to cover for failures.