Did the US Carry Out A Ukrainian Coup in 2014?

[georgephillip]

The late Robert Parry argues a duly elected leader (Victor Yanukovych) was overthrown in 2014 by a minority of Ukrainians even after he agreed to move up elections so people could vote him out of office if a majority wished to do so.

Parry also alleges the US sponsored this illegal coup much as it did in Iran, Guatemala,, Chile, and numerous other countries since the end of WWII:

Did the U.S. Carry Out a Ukrainian Coup?

"NOOR: And so talk about what the West’s role has been in this, especially the United States and Germany, which is another player in this whole affair that hasn’t gotten as much attention.

"PARRY: Well, the United States has been trying to pry Ukraine away from a close relationship with Russia.

"Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland said in December to a group of business leaders that the United States had invested $5 billion, she said, in helping Ukraine achieve its European aspirations, that is, moving it away from Russia into the E.U.

"So, obviously, the United States has played a role in trying to achieve this antidemocratic transition.

"As much as they may call it democratic, overthrowing an elected leader is on its face not democratic."

The question isn't whether a minority of Ukrainians objected to Yanukovych's decision to accept the Russian loan instead of the IMF's; the question is did the US use a small, far-right faction of that minority to impose a pair of US puppets in Kiev in order to advance regime change in Moscow?

 

[Moonglow]

PARRY: Well, the United States has been trying to pry Ukraine away from a close relationship with Russia.

The Kulaks would never agree with that statement.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

The US has been running color revolutions around the world to install preferred puppets that DC & their NWO masters can manipulate.
They have done this for decades & some Americans are waking up to this fact.
They do not use "far right" groups though.
Collectivists always rely on fellow collectivists to do their dirty work.
Calling fascists/Nazis out as far right is typical proggy gaslighting for the masses.
Apparently, Stalin, Mao, Castro & Chavez are OK to be associated with but Hitler & Mussolini must be projected on others

 

[surada]

The late Robert Parry argues a duly elected leader (Victor Yanukovych) was overthrown in 2014 by a minority of Ukrainians even after he agreed to move up elections so people could vote him out of office if a majority wished to do so.

Parry also alleges the US sponsored this illegal coup much as it did in Iran, Guatemala,, Chile, and numerous other countries since the end of WWII:

Did the U.S. Carry Out a Ukrainian Coup?

"NOOR: And so talk about what the West’s role has been in this, especially the United States and Germany, which is another player in this whole affair that hasn’t gotten as much attention.

"PARRY: Well, the United States has been trying to pry Ukraine away from a close relationship with Russia.

"Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland said in December to a group of business leaders that the United States had invested $5 billion, she said, in helping Ukraine achieve its European aspirations, that is, moving it away from Russia into the E.U.

"So, obviously, the United States has played a role in trying to achieve this antidemocratic transition.

"As much as they may call it democratic, overthrowing an elected leader is on its face not democratic."

The question isn't whether a minority of Ukrainians objected to Yanukovych's decision to accept the Russian loan instead of the IMF's; the question is did the US use a small, far-right faction of that minority to impose a pair of US puppets in Kiev in order to advance regime change in Moscow?

In 2014 US foreign policy with support from the EU and UN was to clean up Ukraine's reputation for corruption because they needed to attract foreign investment.

That's why they expelled Shokin and Yanukovitch.

 

[Polishprince]

In 2014 US foreign policy with support from the EU and UN was to clean up Ukraine's reputation for corruption because they needed to attract foreign investment.

That's why they expelled Shokin and Yanukovitch.

Its interesting how you believe that its the US government's interests to impose its wishes on foreign nations.

Is this only with Ukraine, or do you think it would be proper to meddle in the internal affairs of Cuba, Venezuela, Israel and other realms?

 

[Moonglow]

Its interesting how you believe that its the US government's interests to impose its wishes on foreign nations.

Is this only with Ukraine, or do you think it would be proper to meddle in the internal affairs of Cuba, Venezuela, Israel and other realms?

evidently, you is daft about what a superpower does in world politics.

 

[georgephillip]

The Kulaks would never agree with that statement.

Capitalists have never had a problem with making a profit from someone else's blood and soil.

 

[surada]

Its interesting how you believe that its the US government's interests to impose its wishes on foreign nations.

Is this only with Ukraine, or do you think it would be proper to meddle in the internal affairs of Cuba, Venezuela, Israel and other realms?

I'm on record for opposing the US meddling.

 

[georgephillip]

The US has been running color revolutions around the world to install preferred puppets that DC & their NWO masters can manipulate.
They have done this for decades & some Americans are waking up to this fact.
They do not use "far right" groups though.
Collectivists always rely on fellow collectivists to do their dirty work.
Calling fascists/Nazis out as far right is typical proggy gaslighting for the masses.
Apparently, Stalin, Mao, Castro & Chavez are OK to be associated with but Hitler & Mussolini must be projected on others

Yet it seems neo-Nazi fascists played a leading role in driving a duly elected, corrupt president from office in Ukraine? The US employing Nazi's for such purposes inside Ukraine goes back to 1949's Operation Red Sox,

 

[georgephillip]

In 2014 US foreign policy with support from the EU and UN was to clean up Ukraine's reputation for corruption because they needed to attract foreign investment.

That's why they expelled Shokin and Yanukovitch.

The latter agreed to an election that would decide his fate.
Why did the US find that unacceptable?

 

[progressive hunter]

The late Robert Parry argues a duly elected leader (Victor Yanukovych) was overthrown in 2014 by a minority of Ukrainians even after he agreed to move up elections so people could vote him out of office if a majority wished to do so.

Parry also alleges the US sponsored this illegal coup much as it did in Iran, Guatemala,, Chile, and numerous other countries since the end of WWII:

Did the U.S. Carry Out a Ukrainian Coup?

"NOOR: And so talk about what the West’s role has been in this, especially the United States and Germany, which is another player in this whole affair that hasn’t gotten as much attention.

"PARRY: Well, the United States has been trying to pry Ukraine away from a close relationship with Russia.

"Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland said in December to a group of business leaders that the United States had invested $5 billion, she said, in helping Ukraine achieve its European aspirations, that is, moving it away from Russia into the E.U.

"So, obviously, the United States has played a role in trying to achieve this antidemocratic transition.

"As much as they may call it democratic, overthrowing an elected leader is on its face not democratic."

The question isn't whether a minority of Ukrainians objected to Yanukovych's decision to accept the Russian loan instead of the IMF's; the question is did the US use a small, far-right faction of that minority to impose a pair of US puppets in Kiev in order to advance regime change in Moscow?

of course we did,, this is really is old news for people that watch glen beck,
he did a big chalk board on this at least 5 yrs ago,,

I will go see if I can find it,

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Yet it seems neo-Nazi fascists played a leading role in driving a duly elected, corrupt president from office in Ukraine? The US employing Nazi's for such purposes inside Ukraine goes back to 1949's Operation Red Sox,

Like I said, they used leftists.
Neo-Nazis or any kind of fascism is a collectivist totalitarian ideology landing it squarely on the lefty tree of idiocy.
Any type of collectivism philosophy of the "greater good" is from left.
Philosophies of individual freedoms & 'live & let live" come from the right.
There is no overlap & it is not a circle.
These are & always will be diametrically opposed philosophies.

 

[Litwin]

Yanukovych

ivan, who cares whats your RT says ?By far one of the most active and influential Kremlin trolls on this page, right after Maskals with attitude.

 

[Muhammed]

Did the US Carry Out A Ukrainian Coup in 2014?​

Yes. That is why Dontsk, Crimea and Luhansk oblasts held referendums to secede from Ukraine in the first place. And Crimean people also voted to join the Russian Federation.

Those oblasts in eastern Ukraine overwhelmingly voted for Yanukovitch. Then a foreign power from half a world away got their democratically elected president and prime minister ousted and replaced with puppets.

And the Ukrainians ALL know it because the Nuland/Pyatt phone call that proves it was leaked by a whistleblower.

It's right fucking here on YouTube fer crissakes!



Kinda hard to deny the truth when it's right there on audio tape.

 

[1srelluc]

Well yeah.....Glad you could finally able catch up.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The late Robert Parry argues a duly elected leader (Victor Yanukovych) was overthrown in 2014 by a minority of Ukrainians even after he agreed to move up elections so people could vote him out of office if a majority wished to do so.

Parry also alleges the US sponsored this illegal coup much as it did in Iran, Guatemala,, Chile, and numerous other countries since the end of WWII:

Did the U.S. Carry Out a Ukrainian Coup?

"NOOR: And so talk about what the West’s role has been in this, especially the United States and Germany, which is another player in this whole affair that hasn’t gotten as much attention.

"PARRY: Well, the United States has been trying to pry Ukraine away from a close relationship with Russia.

"Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland said in December to a group of business leaders that the United States had invested $5 billion, she said, in helping Ukraine achieve its European aspirations, that is, moving it away from Russia into the E.U.

"So, obviously, the United States has played a role in trying to achieve this antidemocratic transition.

"As much as they may call it democratic, overthrowing an elected leader is on its face not democratic."

The question isn't whether a minority of Ukrainians objected to Yanukovych's decision to accept the Russian loan instead of the IMF's; the question is did the US use a small, far-right faction of that minority to impose a pair of US puppets in Kiev in order to advance regime change in Moscow?

More whacko conspiracy theories for which there is no evidence.

 

[ESay]

The latter agreed to an election that would decide his fate.
Why did the US find that unacceptable?

Yanukovich was highly unpopular among Western-oriented population. Besides, the Euromaidan wouldn't accept Yanukovich keeping power for any amount of time.

 

[georgephillip]

of course we did,, this is really is old news for people that watch glen beck,
he did a big chalk board on this at least 5 yrs ago,,

I will go see if I can find it,

Glenn Greenwald has a similar opinion:

 

[surada]

The latter agreed to an election that would decide his fate.
Why did the US find that unacceptable?

Shokin refused to prosecute corruption.

 

[georgephillip]

Like I said, they used leftists.
Neo-Nazis or any kind of fascism is a collectivist totalitarian ideology landing it squarely on the lefty tree of idiocy.
Any type of collectivism philosophy of the "greater good" is from left.
Philosophies of individual freedoms & 'live & let live" come from the right.
There is no overlap & it is not a circle.
These are & always will be diametrically opposed philosophies.

Fascism and Nazism are right wing authoritarian movements. Hitlers and his Nazis outlawed socialism, executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they began mass-murdering Jews (who were all labelled as socialists)

NazismSocialism

"In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively.

"The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for 'illegal socialist activity' in 1936."