Do you agree with Obama?

[edthecynic]

The Raw Story | Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush

Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush
Josh Catone
Published: Sunday June 3, 2007

In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.

"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]," Milligan said to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country."

So just to be clear, that's your standard? Threads about Democrats based on one party leader in one backwater State means we can say it is the Democrat view? You're saying that?

Don't play dumb, the Right does it to Dems all the time with non-party members from anywhere in the world.

Then why was that your go to example? Republicans overwhelmingly want Obama to go after ISIS and extremists, you don't know what you are talking about. You just hate your enemy, the Republicans. You'd believe they eat children if Democrats told you that

That's what they say in public, but what they want in their heart of hearts is the exact opposite. Republicans are making a dogged effort to shed their political burden of Iraq by arguing that the Islamic State’s ascent is a symptom of Obama’s foreign policy, rather than a byproduct of the 2003 invasion they once championed. Therefore the more terrorist attacks on American soil and the more dead American bodies, the more the GOP can deflect from their blunder in going into Iraq in the first place. The move to shift responsibility is at the core of the GOP’s plan to define 2016 as a foreign-policy election.

Bull crap. You're just saying you believe your own bigotry. I know what's wrong with Republicans, that's why I left the party 25 years ago and stopped voting for them. This isn't it. They want a serious war on terror and they would get behind Obama just like Clinton for NAFTA, the crime bill and welfare reform. You're just believing the lies of the politicians you worship and your own hate, you don't know any more about Republicans than you do theoretical statistics

Pure BULLSHIT!

 

[kaz]

So just to be clear, that's your standard? Threads about Democrats based on one party leader in one backwater State means we can say it is the Democrat view? You're saying that?

Don't play dumb, the Right does it to Dems all the time with non-party members from anywhere in the world.

Then why was that your go to example? Republicans overwhelmingly want Obama to go after ISIS and extremists, you don't know what you are talking about. You just hate your enemy, the Republicans. You'd believe they eat children if Democrats told you that

That's what they say in public, but what they want in their heart of hearts is the exact opposite. Republicans are making a dogged effort to shed their political burden of Iraq by arguing that the Islamic State’s ascent is a symptom of Obama’s foreign policy, rather than a byproduct of the 2003 invasion they once championed. Therefore the more terrorist attacks on American soil and the more dead American bodies, the more the GOP can deflect from their blunder in going into Iraq in the first place. The move to shift responsibility is at the core of the GOP’s plan to define 2016 as a foreign-policy election.

Bull crap. You're just saying you believe your own bigotry. I know what's wrong with Republicans, that's why I left the party 25 years ago and stopped voting for them. This isn't it. They want a serious war on terror and they would get behind Obama just like Clinton for NAFTA, the crime bill and welfare reform. You're just believing the lies of the politicians you worship and your own hate, you don't know any more about Republicans than you do theoretical statistics

Pure BULLSHIT!

Yes, obviously you can speak best for your mortal enemy who you hate in every conceivable way, you know what they actually think, your blood enemy. What a moron