Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks."--Psalm 137:9
The Psalmist is in exile and had probably witnessed the atrocities committed against his people, babies included. In the revenge-style that was common at the time, he wishes the same upon his enemy. Nowhere does it say that God approves of the Psalmist’s request or that he fulfilled it. Just because it is recorded that the Psalmist wrote about this "wish" or curse, doesn’t mean it was approved by God.
The same God that personally murders babies certainly approves His good work done by His faithful minions.
Unless you are a Christian and have a relationship with God, it's hard to understand His ways.
This is obvious nonsense.
In fact, if there's any truth to this... that truth is in the exact opposite of the assertion: Christians are least likely to understand God's ways... the just obey.
Even Christian's don't understand all of His ways - some of them will remain a mystery until we pass from this life to the next.
The same thing can be said of hotdogs. I can't wait for you to make a point.
That being said, here is one viewpoint/explanation -
Source: Why would God order the destruction of men, women, and children?
God lawfully has the right to execute judgment upon anyone.
Nonsense. God has no legal right what-so-ever--NONE!--to execute any judgement upon anyone. Not one single person. Not ever.
How about them apples?
Let's just stop here for a second. "The Bible says" a lot of stuff, and a lot of that stuff is entirely nonsense.
The Bible says that all people have sinned against God and are under his righteous judgment.
Your God's judgment is not "righteous", and decent folks are morally obligated to sin against an evil god.
Therefore, their execution is not an arbitrary killing nor is it murder.
Your God certainly inspired murder, contracted for murder, and personally committed murder. And He celebrates it as "righteous." All of which is documented by your own "authoritative" source.
Murder is the unlawful taking of life.
Correct. Your God is plainly guilty of this crime.
Killing is the lawful taking of life.
Which is what murdering infants most certainly is not.
For example, we can lawfully take a life in defense of our selves, our families, our nations, etc.
None of which your God ever did... and even if He were inclined to defend Himself, His family, or His nation, He wouldn't have to kill ANYONE--certainly not infants--to accomplish such a task. Right?
When God authorizes the nation of Israel to wipe out a people, it is a lawful execution due to their rebellion and sin against God.
No. It's "lawful" by only the most perverse of technicalities. It's not lawful at all to the people being murdered.
The atrocities committed by the Nazis was the exact same kind of "lawful."
Furthermore, such an extermination can be seen to be merciful by delivering the young into the hands of the Lord and possibly saving their souls by not giving them time to become "utterly sinful".2
A perverse rationalization for genocide.
Additionally, further generations that would have arisen from the perverse culture, are likewise prevented from coming into existence and spreading their sin.
Another perverse rationalization for genocide.
Finally, one of the reasons that the Lord is so strong in the Old Testament and orders the killing of people is to ensure that the future messianic line would remain intact.
Yet another perverse rationalization for genocide.
Your God is, or is not, omnipotent?
The enemy, Satan, began his attempt to destroy God's people in the Garden of Eden,...
Nonsense. Never happened. Not even in the Bible.
...by also trying to corrupt the world...
This didn't happen either.
...(which led to Noah's Flood),...
Not this.
...by trying to destroy Israel with attacking armies,...
Well, who could blame Satan (if he were at all involved) for sending armies who were blinldy obeying the orders of a documented criminally violent psychopath.
...and by encouraging Israel to fall into idolatry by exposure to other cultures as well as intermarrying women from those cultures.
Racist, xenophobic rationalization for genocide.
The result of both the idolatry and the interbreeding would have been the failure of the prophecies that foretold of the coming Messiah which specified which family line the Messiah would come through.
More racist, xenophobic rationalization for genocide.
The Messiah, Jesus, would be the one who would die for the sins of the world and without that death there would be no atonement.
Well, that didn't happen either. Unless you're telling me Jesus is dead.
Without the atonement, all people would be lost.
Id really don't think I'm interesed in atoning for sins committed against a murdering psycopath.
So, God was ensuring the arrival of the Messiah via the destruction of the ungodly.
Great. You've just made my case.
I roundly reject your blood-thirsty and sadistic religion of human sacrifice. I am an enemy to your tyrannical "God" of torture and human suffering.
AND I SWEAR, if you offer me salvation through the blood of of the Lord, Jesus Christ(TM), I'll say "NO THANK YOU" to this offer to expunge my "sins" in the blood of an innocent--nor shall I place upon him the burdens of sins he has not committed. In other words, I refuse to make a sacrificial animal of any human being -- including Jesus.