DOJ Knew About Biden Bribery Scandal In 2018 - DOJ Retaliated Against Whistleblower, Protected Biden

[easyt65]

The whistleblower had to go to the House Oversight Committee 2 years later for anything to be done about the crime because the liberal partisanly weaponized DOJ was protecting Biden even in 2018 & has every day since.


Jim Hoft reported on Wednesday that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) sent letters to the FBI, demanding the bureau to produce an unclassified record of an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national.

On Sunday, a New York Post report revealed that “explosive” bribery allegations involving Joe Biden and foreign nationals were brought to the Department of Justice back in 2018.'

This was two years before very similar allegations against the Biden were made by the whistleblower now talking to the House Oversight Committee."

Highly Respected Ex-Prosecutor Brought "Explosive" Joe Biden Bribery Allegations Involving Foreign Nationals to Department of Justice in 2018 - DOJ Ignored Allegations and Retaliated Against Prosecutor in a Very Sinister Way | The Gateway Pundit | by

Jim Hoft reported on Wednesday that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[JoeB131]

Except Congress investigated this in 2020 and cleared Biden.

Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden (Published 2020)

The report delivered on Wednesday appeared to be little more than a rehashing of unproven allegations that echoed a Russian disinformation campaign.

www.nytimes.com

WASHINGTON — An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, closing out an inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish the Democratic presidential nominee.

The investigation found that Hunter Biden had “cashed in” on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world. It also concluded that his work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company then mired in a corruption scandal, while the former vice president was directing American policy toward Kyiv had given the appearance of a conflict of interest and alarmed some State Department officials.

But an 87-page report summing up the findings, released jointly on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees, contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed. In fact, investigators heard witness testimony that rebutted those charges.

 

[MarathonMike]

The DOJ has been in the pocket of the Democratic Party for years. Nothing will happen to Hunter or the head of the crime family Big Guy Joe. You can count on that.

 

[rightwinger]

DOJ reported to Trump in 2018

Was Trump covering for Biden?

 

[rightwinger]

The DOJ has been in the pocket of the Democratic Party for years. Nothing will happen to Hunter or the head of the crime family Big Guy Joe. You can count on that.

Yea….not having evidence is like that sometimes

 

[yidnar]

The whistleblower had to go to the House Oversight Committee 2 years later for anything to be done about the crime because the liberal partisanly weaponized DOJ was protecting Biden even in 2018 & has every day since.


Jim Hoft reported on Wednesday that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) sent letters to the FBI, demanding the bureau to produce an unclassified record of an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national.

On Sunday, a New York Post report revealed that “explosive” bribery allegations involving Joe Biden and foreign nationals were brought to the Department of Justice back in 2018.'

This was two years before very similar allegations against the Biden were made by the whistleblower now talking to the House Oversight Committee."

Highly Respected Ex-Prosecutor Brought "Explosive" Joe Biden Bribery Allegations Involving Foreign Nationals to Department of Justice in 2018 - DOJ Ignored Allegations and Retaliated Against Prosecutor in a Very Sinister Way | The Gateway Pundit | by

Jim Hoft reported on Wednesday that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

supposed to be some heavy stuff coming out about the Bidens business dealings and influence peddling Wednesday !

 

[yidnar]

Yea….not having evidence is like that sometimes

we shall see faggot ....we shall see ..

 

[MarathonMike]

Yea….not having evidence is like that sometimes

Whatever you say "award winning PAID poster".

 

[rightwinger]

Whatever you say "award winning PAID poster".

And USMB Influencer

 

[Moonglow]

And USMB Influencer

Number one in ratings and satisfaction of your "Q" zone.

 

[easyt65]

Except Congress investigated this in 2020 and cleared Biden.

Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden (Published 2020)

The report delivered on Wednesday appeared to be little more than a rehashing of unproven allegations that echoed a Russian disinformation campaign.

www.nytimes.com

WASHINGTON — An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, closing out an inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish the Democratic presidential nominee.

The investigation found that Hunter Biden had “cashed in” on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world. It also concluded that his work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company then mired in a corruption scandal, while the former vice president was directing American policy toward Kyiv had given the appearance of a conflict of interest and alarmed some State Department officials.

But an 87-page report summing up the findings, released jointly on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees, contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed. In fact, investigators heard witness testimony that rebutted those charges.

I did not know 2023 was an election year ... neither was 2018 a Presidential election year...

"...investigators heard..."

Yeah, reminds me of the Democrats' 1st FAILED Impeachment attempt, when Democrats had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses.

Oh, they had a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand 'i / He heard rumors, was told...blah, blah, blah.

In other words, in Joe and Hunter's defense, Democrats are producing a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand bullshit but no actual evidence again.

 

[easyt65]

supposed to be some heavy stuff coming out about the Bidens business dealings and influence peddling Wednesday !

This evidence / testimony about Biden taking Bribes, 1st reported in 2018, is reportedly part of the crimes and evidence Comer and Grassly have against the Bidens and that will be released on Wednesday.

 

[Catsnmeters]

I did not know 2023 was an election year ... neither was 2018 a Presidential election year...



Yeah, reminds me of the Democrats' 1st FAILED Impeachment attempt, when Democrats had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses.

Oh, they had a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand 'i / He heard rumors, was told...blah, blah, blah.

In other words, in Joe and Hunter's defense, Democrats are producing a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand bullshit but no actual evidence again.

It wasn't an attempt. Trump was impeached twice.

 

[Catsnmeters]

This evidence / testimony about Biden taking Bribes, 1st reported in 2018, is reportedly part of the crimes and evidence Comer and Grassly have against the Bidens and that will be released on Wednesday.

Lol, and you believe it.

 

[easyt65]

Emails Show Biden Corruption Allegations Sent To Federal Prosecutor In 2018: Report | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

I would live to see .. what needs to be seen ... is US AG Garland hauled before the Oversight Committee and these questions asked ....with the hearing ending like this:


'I will remind the US Attorney General tbat he is still under oath before we begin...

Attorney General Garland, why did the DOJ take no action on reports and Whistleblower testimony in 2018 against then FORMER VP / citizen Joe Biden for engaging in corruption to include Bribery and Pay-To-Play schemes?

You DO realize this constitutes election interference, do you not?

When you learned about it when you became US AG why did YOU not act on it?



On a seperate issue, US AG Garland, why has the FBI and DOJ had Hunter Biden's confirmed laptop, having been confirmed to be his laptop, for several YEARS now and taken no action?



Have you taken any action to investigate the now proven story that Sect of State - then Biden campaign manager - Blinken autjored the now infamous 'Laptop Russian Disinformation' letter and convinced 50 US Intel experts to sign it to help them candidate Biden and interfere in the 2020 election?
-- If not, WHY NOT?

You DO realize that this constitutes election interference, right?



AG Garland, it has now been proven that you and the DOJ knew about President Biden's TS/SCI - Classified information scandal PRIOR to the 2022 mid-tetm elections....

...that you knew there was a significant amount of classified documents capable of causing grave damage to the US if allowed to get into the wrong hands In multiple locations, unguarded, unsecured...

... and YOU CHOSE to hide this fact, chose not to immediayely collet and secure those documents until AFTER the mid-term elections IOT NOT harm Democrat chances during the elections, THEREBY PUTTING PARTISAN POLITICS AHEAD OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

You DO realize this was, at least, the THIRD (3rd) time YOU / THE DOJ has interfered in federal elections, do you not?


AG Garland it has been proven repeatedly that YOU & the DOJ have ignored, sat on, and hidden criminal evidence repeatedly, that you and the DOJ have REPEATEDLY interfered in US elections for tbe benefit and protection of the Democrat Party, Joe Biden, and the Bidrn family.

You have demonstrated that fair and equal Justice is beyond your ability or desire to produce, protect, and defend, as you are the epitome of a partisanly weaponized federal govt official...

..And this is the readon I am revommending and immediately initiating your Impeachment.'

 

[Catsnmeters]

Emails Show Biden Corruption Allegations Sent To Federal Prosecutor In 2018: Report | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

I would live to see .. what needs to be seen ... is US AG Garland hauled before the Oversight Committee and these questions asked ....with the hearing ending like this:


'I will remind the US Attorney General tbat he is still under oath before we begin...

Attorney General Garland, why did the DOJ take no action on reports and Whistleblower testimony in 2018 against then FORMER VP / citizen Joe Biden for engaging in corruption to include Bribery and Pay-To-Play schemes?

You DO realize this constitutes election interference, do you not?

When you learned about it when you became US AG why did YOU not act on it?



On a seperate issue, US AG Garland, why has the FBI and DOJ had Hunter Biden's confirmed laptop, having been confirmed to be his laptop, for several YEARS now and taken no action?



Have you taken any action to investigate the now proven story that Sect of State - then Biden campaign manager - Blinken autjored the now infamous 'Laptop Russian Disinformation' letter and convinced 50 US Intel experts to sign it to help them candidate Biden and interfere in the 2020 election?
-- If not, WHY NOT?

You DO realize that this constitutes election interference, right?



AG Garland, it has now been proven that you and the DOJ knew about President Biden's TS/SCI - Classified information scandal PRIOR to the 2022 mid-tetm elections....

...that you knew there was a significant amount of classified documents capable of causing grave damage to the US if allowed to get into the wrong hands In multiple locations, unguarded, unsecured...

... and YOU CHOSE to hide this fact, chose not to immediayely collet and secure those documents until AFTER the mid-term elections IOT NOT harm Democrat chances during the elections, THEREBY PUTTING PARTISAN POLITICS AHEAD OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

You DO realize this was, at least, the THIRD (3rd) time YOU / THE DOJ has interfered in federal elections, do you not?


AG Garland it has been proven repeatedly that YOU & the DOJ have ignored, sat on, and hidden criminal evidence repeatedly, that you and the DOJ have REPEATEDLY interfered in US elections for tbe benefit and protection of the Democrat Party, Joe Biden, and the Bidrn family.

You have demonstrated that fair and equal Justice is beyond your ability or desire to produce, protect, and defend, as you are the epitome of a partisanly weaponized federal govt official...

..And this is the readon I am revommending and immediately initiating your Impeachment.'

How come there are no answers to those questions?

Is this loon talking to himself?

 

[easyt65]

It wasn't an attempt. Trump was impeached twice.

The faux Impeachnents wete proven to be UnConstitutional and criminal.

Pelosi promised not to allow Impeachment to proceed unless 2 things existed: 1) Bipartisanship & 2) Undeniable evidence. She had NEITHER.

When pushed on this she literally argued that no crime is needed for Impeachment.

During both Impeachments Democrats proved they had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses..

...which was made obvious by the fact that in both faux Impeachments Democrats were caught illegally altering transcripts (which they again were caught doing during the J6 Committee hearings), illegally manufacturing evidence, and creating / claiming to have non-existent whistleblowers...ALL IN AN ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE US GOVT BY TRYING TO ILLEGALLY REMOVE A SITTING PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE.

Both failed, faux Impeachments were exposed as embarrassing, criminal clusterfucks that blew up in the Democrats' faces ... which will be recorded in history.

 

[easyt65]

How come there are no answers to those questions?

Is this loon talking to himself?

The questions have not been asked of Garland under oath ... but they should be.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The faux Impeachnents wete proven to be UnConstitutional and criminal.

Pelosi promised not to allow Impeachment to proceed unless 2 things existed: 1) Bipartisanship & 2) Undeniable evidence. She had NEITHER.

When pushed on this she literally argued that no crime is needed for Impeachment.

During both Impeachments Democrats proved they had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses..

...which was made obvious by the fact that in both faux Impeachments Democrats were caught illegally altering transcripts (which they again were caught doing during the J6 Committee hearings), illegally manufacturing evidence, and creating / claiming to have non-existent whistleblowers...ALL IN AN ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE US GOVT BY TRYING TO ILLEGALLY REMOVE A SITTING PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE.

Both failed, faux Impeachments were exposed as embarrassing, criminal clusterfucks that blew up in the Democrats' faces ... which will be recorded in history.

View attachment 783528

Ok. Thanks for your greviences.

My point stands.

Trump was impeached twice. You ignorantly stated otherwise.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The questions have not been asked of Garland under oath ... but they should be.

So you post an imaginary interview as evidence?

Good grief. Are you ok?