Federal judge appears skeptical probationary firings were for performance

It didn't say poor performance. What's wrong with you?
OK looks like you are fucking stupid
:slap:

Federal employees reeling from a wave of firings that began last week Federal employees reeling from a wave of firings that began last week have focused on language in their termination letters targeting their “performance” as particularly upsetting.
 
Pssst, perhaps his dept was one that was eliminated.
Just food for thought. Not like you OR I know all the details, right?

Nope, we know that his termination email says that he was terminated for "poor performance" after a 20 year military career rising the lvl of 1st Sgt, 12 years with the VA, and having just been promoted to a new higher position.

All signs of a poor performing slacker.

WW
 
Nope, we know that his termination email says that he was terminated for "poor performance" after a 20 year military career rising the lvl of 1st Sgt, 12 years with the VA, and having just been promoted to a new higher position.

All signs of a poor performing slacker.

WW
Just maybe he was a slacker, not sure you know it or not, BUT, too often
in the government, it's who you know, not what you know. True story
Being employed by the government for 30 years, I've seen it far too often.
 
'A federal judge repeatedly sounded skeptical on Wednesday that the Trump administration’s mass firings of probationary federal workers were made by the government because the employees couldn’t do their jobs, saying the terminations appeared to be part of a larger goal.

U.S. District Judge James Bredar made the comments at a hearing where nearly 20 states are seeking a temporary restraining order to stop any more firings of federal probationary employees and to reinstate those who have already been dismissed. If the dismissals were part of a large-scale reduction in force, there are certain laws guiding the process.

“This case isn’t about whether or not the government can terminate people. It’s about if they decide to terminate people how they must do it,” Bredar said. “Move fast and break things. Move fast, fine. Break things, if that involves breaking the law then that becomes problematic.”

The states argue that the Trump administration blindsided them by ignoring laws set out for large-scale layoffs, which could have devastating consequences for their state finances. At least 24,000 probationary employees have been terminated since Trump took office, the lawsuit alleges.’


Needless to say, it had nothing to do with performance – that’s a lie propagated by Trump.

The firings were part of Trump’s agenda of chaos and dysfunction, sloppy, ham-fisted, and illegal.
So what? Waste is waste. But, speaking of poor performance, I wonder what this worthless judge's view on non performance would be, huh facediaper??
 
I’m waiting for the first wack job bought and paid for declaration of “I can feel what you will be thinking so going to rule against it in advance”
 
Congress has the authority to reduce the number of judges

But I think automatic retirement after about 12 years is more practical

Correct. They can reduce the number of Judges.

Then not appoint/confirm new Judges until the target is met.

For existing Judges the ONLY way to remove them against their will is impeachment.

WW
 
Correct. They can reduce the number of Judges.

Then not appoint/confirm new Judges until the target is met.

For existing Judges the ONLY way to remove them against their will is impeachment.

WW
Wrong

Cancel their seat and the judge is canceled also
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom