I have given you the reading material sambo their will be a testI'm waiting for you to educate me on which part you think supports your argument. How am I supposed to know what you imagine supports your argument before you enlighten me?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have given you the reading material sambo their will be a testI'm waiting for you to educate me on which part you think supports your argument. How am I supposed to know what you imagine supports your argument before you enlighten me?
You've given me a code of ethics. What you haven't done is demonstrated how you imagine Fani Willis has violated it. You can't can you? I never imagined for a second that you could.I have given you the reading material sambo their will be a test
/——/ Law school teaches you to pass the bar exam. It’s up to each attorney to find their specialty and learn from piers and through studying. Experience is everything. 30 years experience in personal injury is completely useless in a RICO trial. An immigration attorney does know squat about corporate law. It’s no different than the medical field.That's not a backpedal. That's post #186 Cellblock2429 already conceded this point to me on post #177.
You can keep being a bitch for as long as you like. I have all the time in the world to laugh at you for being unable to articulate what legal qualifications Wade doesn't meet.
Is that a legal argument or a Simp sermon?/——/ Law school teaches you to pass the bar exam. It’s up to each attorney to find their specialty and learn from piers and through studying. Experience is everything. 30 years experience in personal injury is completely useless in a RICO trial. An immigration attorney does know squat about corporate law. It’s no different than the medical field.
/—-/ It’s a fact. 16 years in legal. Call an attorney and ask them if they are qualified to practice outside their specialty. I said qualified, not legally allowed. Would you go to a dermatologist for heart surgery? Just because you graduated with a JD doesn’t mean you are competent to practice in every specialty.Is that a legal argument or a Simp sermon?
I get that you're using the world qualified in an entirely subjective manner, I'm not sure if you're aware. The only objective qualification he needs is to be a licensed lawyer./—-/ It’s a fact. 16 years in legal. Call an attorney and ask them if they are qualified to practice outside their specialty. I said qualified, not legally allowed. Would you go to a dermatologist for heart surgery? Just because you graduated with a JD doesn’t mean you are competent to practice in every specialty.
Law Firm Specialization: Why It Matters
While in theory, the idea of casting a wider net may lead you to believe that you'll catch more fish, the truth is it doesn't always apply to business. When it comes to catching customers, the more you appeal to one specific kind of customer, the higher your success rate, and the more qualified...www.natlawreview.com
/—-/ OK idiot. Just ignore everything I said. No experience in RICO required or necessary. Just make it up as you go along.I get that you're using the world qualified in an entirely subjective manner, I'm not sure if you're aware. The only objective qualification he needs is to be a licensed lawyer.
/——/ I said the same thing. A real estate lawyer can defend you in criminal court, because he’s a lawyer. Bonehead.I obviously do since I just got you to concede that I'm right and that experience prosecuting these sorts of cases isn't a legal requirement. If his inexperience was going to be a problem for the prosecution then the defense should welcome that and Fani should be complaining. The fact that it's the other way around is just more evidence how full of shit these accusations are. If Wade was a bad prosecutor the defense wouldn't be trying to get him thrown off the case but simple analysis is beyond you Bingos.
I don't care what you subjectively think would qualify because the law doesnt require him to have your subjective consent, does it? That said wouldn't his incompetence sort itself out in favor of the defense?/—-/ OK idiot. Just ignore everything I said. No experience in RICO required or necessary. Just make it up as you go along.
BWHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHA
Then what objective legal argument is there that Wade isn't qualified?/——/ I said the same thing. A real estate lawyer can defend you in criminal court, because he’s a lawyer. Bonehead.
/——/ You really can’t be this stupid, can you? Lack of experience in that area of law. One mistake and the case is lost. GEEEZEThen what objective legal argument is there that Wade isn't qualified?
How is the possible precariousness of the prosecutions case a legal matter that gets the defendants charges dropped? That's what the motion filed requested. I'm still struggling to discern the legal argument and you seem just as lost. I guess we both get to figure out what Ashleigh is thinking on the 8th./——/ You really can’t be this stupid, can you? Lack of experience in that area of law. One mistake and the case is lost. GEEEZE
/——/ I’m not lost after 16 years in legal. You’re charged with murder. Are you going to retain an attorney with 20 years experience in Bankruptcy or one with 20 years in criminal defense? Both have stellar track records. Go ahead and tell me.How is the possible precariousness of the prosecutions case a legal matter that gets the defendants charges dropped? That's what the motion filed requested. I'm still struggling to discern the legal argument and you seem just as lost. I guess we both get to figure out what Ashleigh is thinking on the 8th.
First tell me what relevance this has to any sort of legal argument. Maybe Nathan Wade's qualifications matter to you subjectively if you're the one hiring him but in this case you aren't the one hiring him so your opinion doesn't matter. In what Universe do you imagine a defendant giving the opinion that his prosecutor is unqualified is the beginning and end of the argument and prosecution?/——/ I’m not lost after 16 years in legal. You’re charged with murder. Are you going to retain an attorney with 20 years experience in Bankruptcy or one with 20 years in criminal defense? Both have stellar track records. Go ahead and tell me.
/——/ Fani picked the best humper.First tell me what relevance this has to any sort of legal argument. Maybe Nathan Wade's qualifications matter to you subjectively if you're the one hiring him but in this case you aren't the one hiring him so your opinion doesn't matter. In what Universe do you imagine a defendant giving the opinion that his prosecutor is unqualified is the beginning and end of the argument and prosecution?
Fani is the one empowered to hire him and beyond the objective qualification, which he meets, the only subjective opinion that matters beyond that is hers.
That's not a legal argument. Ms. Merchant better hope she has a better argument than that./——/ Fani picked the best humper.
Meh......Wade can get legal consultations for his lack of experience on Fanni's My Pillow while having sexual trysts....That's not a backpedal. That's post #186 Cellblock2429 already conceded this point to me on post #177.
You can keep being a bitch for as long as you like. I have all the time in the world to laugh at you for being unable to articulate what legal qualifications Wade doesn't meet.