Gay marriage or hetero-marriage to "children?" What matter most?

[Delta4Embassy]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

 

[Porker]

D4E, is your main purpose in life trying to present every possible angle to seek other peoples' approval of homosexual marriage?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

D4E, is your main purpose in life trying to present every possible angle to seek other peoples' approval of homosexual marriage?

As someone who can't for the life of himself ever imagine getting married or wanting to get married, to anyone, I don't actually care about marriage per se'. Just law and equality.

 

[Porker]

D4E, is your main purpose in life trying to present every possible angle to seek other peoples' approval of homosexual marriage?

As someone who can't for the life of himself ever imagine getting married or wanting to get married, to anyone, I don't actually care about marriage per se'. Just law and equality.

It just seems to be you're favorite topic.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Gay marriage or hetero-marriage to "children?" What matter most?

Marriage equality, of course.

 

[Correll]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

THe long standing practice of marriage with significant age differences, and/or marriage at a young age had been looked down on enough that social stigma has reduced it to a minor matter.

THe gay rights agenda of changing law though sophist semantics by pretending that marriage has NOT been a long standing institution between a man and a woman is designed more to insult traditional American culture than to serve the interests of the small number of gays who might want to marry.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

THe long standing practice of marriage with significant age differences, and/or marriage at a young age had been looked down on enough that social stigma has reduced it to a minor matter.

THe gay rights agenda of changing law though sophist semantics by pretending that marriage has NOT been a long standing institution between a man and a woman is designed more to insult traditional American culture than to serve the interests of the small number of gays who might want to marry.

The semantic problem is conflating 'traditional marriage where women were property' with 'modern marriage for love.'

 

[Correll]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

THe long standing practice of marriage with significant age differences, and/or marriage at a young age had been looked down on enough that social stigma has reduced it to a minor matter.

THe gay rights agenda of changing law though sophist semantics by pretending that marriage has NOT been a long standing institution between a man and a woman is designed more to insult traditional American culture than to serve the interests of the small number of gays who might want to marry.

The semantic problem is conflating 'traditional marriage where women were property' with 'modern marriage for love.'

No, it's not.

It's confusing "traditional marriage" with what they want it to be, not what is has been for centuries.

It's a move designed to divide.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

THe long standing practice of marriage with significant age differences, and/or marriage at a young age had been looked down on enough that social stigma has reduced it to a minor matter.

THe gay rights agenda of changing law though sophist semantics by pretending that marriage has NOT been a long standing institution between a man and a woman is designed more to insult traditional American culture than to serve the interests of the small number of gays who might want to marry.

The semantic problem is conflating 'traditional marriage where women were property' with 'modern marriage for love.'

No, it's not.

It's confusing "traditional marriage" with what they want it to be, not what is has been for centuries.

It's a move designed to divide.

Tradition or equality, which matters more?

 

[Correll]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

THe long standing practice of marriage with significant age differences, and/or marriage at a young age had been looked down on enough that social stigma has reduced it to a minor matter.

THe gay rights agenda of changing law though sophist semantics by pretending that marriage has NOT been a long standing institution between a man and a woman is designed more to insult traditional American culture than to serve the interests of the small number of gays who might want to marry.

The semantic problem is conflating 'traditional marriage where women were property' with 'modern marriage for love.'

No, it's not.

It's confusing "traditional marriage" with what they want it to be, not what is has been for centuries.

It's a move designed to divide.

Tradition or equality, which matters more?

From the actions of the activists? neither.

THe important thing is to score partisan points and wage culture war.

 

[jwoodie]

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

No, it is because it makes marriage look more like a joke than it already has become to an increasing number of people.

 

[whitehall]

I don't know about you but it seems to me that there are a disturbing series of posts by "delta4" related to and defending statutory rape of an underage female (or male?) .

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

In all the discussion and debate over gay marriage, no one mentions how it's already legal in every state for straights to marry children (those under age 18.)

Here in Missouri you can marry a 15 year-old if her parents say ok. And there's a provision for marrying those under 15 if a judge says ok. Georgia and Hawaii and others are also 15 with parental consent.

Age of marriage in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Everyone seems to think if gays are allowed to marry that'll somehow threaten heterosexual marriage? Is it because some gay couples will include adults and children maybe since heterosexuals can already do that?

LOL! And it begins... .

.

.

.

OK... I'll say it. "Told ya so..."

 

[AntiParty]

D4E, is your main purpose in life trying to present every possible angle to seek other peoples' approval of homosexual marriage?

As someone who can't for the life of himself ever imagine getting married or wanting to get married, to anyone, I don't actually care about marriage per se'. Just law and equality.

It just seems to be you're favorite topic.

The people who served this oppression tend to take this angle once they start losing the debates on the topic;
"Why are you making such a big deal out of it. It wouldn't be a big deal if you would just drop it"

Yet anti-gay marriage is still oppressed in the USA.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Gay marriage or hetero-marriage to "children?" What matter most?"

What matters most is that everyone understands that this fails as a red herring fallacy; at what age a given state might allow persons to marry has nothing whatsoever with to with the equal protection rights of same-sex couples to access marriage law they're eligible to participate in.

 

[Porker]

D4E, is your main purpose in life trying to present every possible angle to seek other peoples' approval of homosexual marriage?

As someone who can't for the life of himself ever imagine getting married or wanting to get married, to anyone, I don't actually care about marriage per se'. Just law and equality.

It just seems to be you're favorite topic.

The people who served this oppression tend to take this angle once they start losing the debates on the topic;
"Why are you making such a big deal out of it. It wouldn't be a big deal if you would just drop it"

Yet anti-gay marriage is still oppressed in the USA.

It's not my thread, wise ass. By the way, nuclear war is still oppressed in the USA. So the hell what? Delta just seems to have NOTHING else on his mind except faggot marriage.