kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
[I already addressed this. You are removing choice in your endless liberal class warfare. Newt is arguing offering money for work and leaving it up to the kids whether to take it. He no where says if you are poor you will have to clean bathrooms. He's assuming they are more likely to take it. You say no, FORCE kids to clean. Newt was forcing no one to do anything.
.
As I said, if that is true, then Newt's idea coupled with his premise makes no sense. If only the kids who want to work get the work,
then all the kids who don't want to work, including those Newt says think that way because of the no-work environment they are raised in,
would be unaffected by this scheme. Therefore the whole project is lunacy, Gingrich-style.
So you seriously believe that offering paying work is "lunacy Gingrich-style." Wow. I personally am glad that my church and all the people who hired me didn't think that. But it certainly explains your politics. Libertarianism works because it's based on how people really are in their daily lives. Liberalism doesn't because even liberals aren't like liberals think the world should be. Advocating we build actual policies and use the power of guns to force people to do what liberals don't even do themselves is the true lunacy.