Yes, the most liberal economist would agree that free trade is good for the economy.It's the field of economics itself, it's not commentary by the teachers.There is something that you are probably familiar with as well........teachers indoctrinate.Free trade being in the interest of the overall economy is so basic to the field of economics that you literally would learn that and why in your first econ class. So you concede that maybe, just maybe, economists know more about that then the lawyers you worship? Here's a hint. Lawyers lie. Shocking, isn't it?
What a stupid argument. It's the field of economics itself, it's not commentary by the teachers.
You ignore the big gains of lower prices. They benefit all consumers and they help American companies compete both domestically and internationally with foreign competition
BS, that's why there is only one school of economics and everyone is in agreement on the correct policies to follow right?
This is econ 101, it's way below where different theories come into play. It's like arguing algebra is wrong in math.
Yes, the most liberal economist would agree that free trade is good for the economy.
Yes, they are indoctrinated. We have experienced the affects of free trade and it is good only to the corporations who benefit from cheap labor. Are you familiar with Sir James Goldsmith? He predicted the outcome of these free trade agreements, he was particularly disturbed by GATT/WTO.
It's the problem with schools, they indoctrinate people with free markets and conservatism ...
Yeah ...