TimothysAlaska
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2014
- 489
- 77
- 80
The New Testament as in the Kings james version. The ending 16:9-16:20 was added to better fit the other gospels. In the original it ended at 16:8 and the women went away fearful and amazed from the tomb and told no one. Yet the ending was indeed changed as the years went by and the oldest version of mark never has the current ending that is in the king James version. And it is an apparent edit the prose is wrong and words are used that the original author never used. The New Testament has other "edits". I realize most of you believe that the gospel was written by divine inspiration but it is obvious that it was changed to fit the doctrine. It appears to had been added in the 4th century. So they were inspired to change it close to 400 years after?
And since it was changed why is not the gospel of judas not included? It was found and it was just as old as the other gospels yet the gospel of mark is the oldest?
And since it was changed why is not the gospel of judas not included? It was found and it was just as old as the other gospels yet the gospel of mark is the oldest?