Guess Who Proposed These Social Security and Medicare Reforms in the 1960s?

mikegriffith1

Mike Griffith
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 23, 2012
6,562
3,715
1,085
Virginia
Guess which political party formally proposed these liberal-sounding reforms for Social Security and Medicare? The answer will surprise you. I quote directly from the party's platform:

Social Security

1. An immediate increase in Social Security payments with a goal of a 60% increase in benefits.

2. An increase in the minimum payment to $100, with annual cost of living increases. [$100 in the 1960s equals about $900 today.]

3. Restoration of the 100% income tax deduction for drugs and medical expenses paid out by people 65 and over.

4. Removal of the earnings limitation of people 65 and over in order that they may earn any amount of additional income.

Medicare

1. Relief to persons unable to pay deductible charges under Medicare.

2. Relief to persons unable to have deducted from their Social Security checks the monthly fee for physician service coverage under Medicare.

3. Providing for uninterrupted nursing home care for those with chronic illness who require such care.

4. We will encourage low-cost insurance programs for the elderly and will assist the states and local communities in building hospitals, nursing homes, clinics as well as medical and nursing schools.

In this land of plenty, no one should be denied adequate medical care because of his financial condition.


Believe it or not, these proposals were made by the American Independent Party in 1968, the party whose presidential candidate was Governor George Wallace and whose VP candidate was General Curtis LeMay (Ret.) (LINK).

Wallace won five states and 46 Electoral College votes. He also got over 30% of the vote in South Carolina and North Carolina, over 20% of the vote in Florida and Virginia, and over 10% of the vote in Texas, Ohio, Missouri, Michigan, Nevada, Delaware, and Idaho.
 
Last edited:
Democrat administrations routinely stole money from the FICA fund right after it was established until LBJ made it "official" that Social Security taxes were part of the government's general fund. There is no locked box, only promises.

There never has been a lock box for Social Security revenue. By law, since the 1930s, all Social Security surplus funds must be invested only in U.S. Treasury securities, and the two trust funds that pay SS benefits have never been part of the federal government's general fund.

This being said, the SS Administration has acknowledged that in about 11 years, SS revenue will only cover about 75% of SS benefit payments (LINK). What are our leaders doing about this? Right now, NOTHING.

I was not old enough to vote in 1968. But, knowing what I know now, if I could go back in time and vote in that election, I would probably vote for Humphrey.
 
Last edited:
There never has been a lock box for Social Security revenue. By law, since the 1930s, all Social Security surplus funds must be invested only in U.S. Treasury securities, and the two trust funds that pay SS benefits have never been part of the federal government's general fund.

This being said, the SS Administration has acknowledged that in about 11 years, SS revenue will only cover about 75% of SS benefit payments (LINK). What are our leaders doing about this? Right now, NOTHING.

I was not old enough to vote in 1968. But, knowing what I know now, if I could go back in time and vote in that election, I would probably vote for Humphrey.
Blame Nixon? Humphrey and the democrats were part of the problem. LBJ proved that.
 
Guess which political party formally proposed these liberal-sounding reforms for Social Security and Medicare? The answer will surprise you. I quote directly from the party's platform:

Social Security

1. An immediate increase in Social Security payments with a goal of a 60% increase in benefits.

2. An increase in the minimum payment to $100, with annual cost of living increases. [$100 in the 1960s equals about $900 today.]

3. Restoration of the 100% income tax deduction for drugs and medical expenses paid out by people 65 and over.

4. Removal of the earnings limitation of people 65 and over in order that they may earn any amount of additional income.

Medicare

1. Relief to persons unable to pay deductible charges under Medicare.

2. Relief to persons unable to have deducted from their Social Security checks the monthly fee for physician service coverage under Medicare.

3. Providing for uninterrupted nursing home care for those with chronic illness who require such care.

4. We will encourage low-cost insurance programs for the elderly and will assist the states and local communities in building hospitals, nursing homes, clinics as well as medical and nursing schools.

In this land of plenty, no one should be denied adequate medical care because of his financial condition.


Believe it or not, these proposals were made by the American Independent Party in 1968, the party whose presidential candidate was Governor George Wallace and whose VP candidate was General Curtis LeMay (Ret.) (LINK).

Wallace won five states and 46 Electoral College votes. He also got over 30% of the vote in South Carolina and North Carolina, over 20% of the vote in Florida and Virginia, and over 10% of the vote in Texas, Ohio, Missouri, Michigan, Nevada, Delaware, and Idaho.
That’s cause Geo. the socialist had a lot of poor whites voting for him. Hypocrisy knows no bounds. Poor whites love their SS and Medicare now still, yet buy the lies of conservatives on the economy.
Bottom line, they, conservatives make proposals on aid and infrastructure but seldom if ever, vote to pass shit.
THEY ARE ONLY PROPOSALS MADE WHILE RUNNING FOR OFFICE.
Trump said/says he’ll have great healthcare. Hilarious. It’s too hard for him.
 
Last edited:
Guess which political party formally proposed these liberal-sounding reforms for Social Security and Medicare? The answer will surprise you. I quote directly from the party's platform:

Social Security

1. An immediate increase in Social Security payments with a goal of a 60% increase in benefits.

2. An increase in the minimum payment to $100, with annual cost of living increases. [$100 in the 1960s equals about $900 today.]

3. Restoration of the 100% income tax deduction for drugs and medical expenses paid out by people 65 and over.

4. Removal of the earnings limitation of people 65 and over in order that they may earn any amount of additional income.

Medicare

1. Relief to persons unable to pay deductible charges under Medicare.

2. Relief to persons unable to have deducted from their Social Security checks the monthly fee for physician service coverage under Medicare.

3. Providing for uninterrupted nursing home care for those with chronic illness who require such care.

4. We will encourage low-cost insurance programs for the elderly and will assist the states and local communities in building hospitals, nursing homes, clinics as well as medical and nursing schools.

In this land of plenty, no one should be denied adequate medical care because of his financial condition.


Believe it or not, these proposals were made by the American Independent Party in 1968, the party whose presidential candidate was Governor George Wallace and whose VP candidate was General Curtis LeMay (Ret.) (LINK).

Wallace won five states and 46 Electoral College votes. He also got over 30% of the vote in South Carolina and North Carolina, over 20% of the vote in Florida and Virginia, and over 10% of the vote in Texas, Ohio, Missouri, Michigan, Nevada, Delaware, and Idaho.
Proposed but never passed. They proposed but never passed significant infrastructure bills in Either.
 
That’s cause Geo. the socialist had a lot of poor whites voting for him. Hypocrisy knows no bounds. Poor whites love their SS and Medicare now still, yet buy the lies of conservatives on the economy.
Bottom line, they, conservatives make proposals on aid and infrastructure but seldom if ever, vote to pass shit.
THEY ARE ONLY PROPOSALS MADE WHILE RUNNING FOR OFFICE.
Trump said/says he’ll have great healthcare. Hilarious. It’s too hard for him.
Actually, Trump did improve Obamacare, after he failed to repeal it. But, I'm guessing your hatred of Trump is so blind and intense that your mind is closed to any evidence on this point.
 
Actually, Trump did improve Obamacare, after he failed to repeal it. But, I'm guessing your hatred of Trump is so blind and intense that your mind is closed to any evidence on this point.

Let’s see the evidence.
 
Guess which political party formally proposed these liberal-sounding reforms for Social Security and Medicare? The answer will surprise you. I quote directly from the party's platform:

Social Security

1. An immediate increase in Social Security payments with a goal of a 60% increase in benefits.

2. An increase in the minimum payment to $100, with annual cost of living increases. [$100 in the 1960s equals about $900 today.]

3. Restoration of the 100% income tax deduction for drugs and medical expenses paid out by people 65 and over.

4. Removal of the earnings limitation of people 65 and over in order that they may earn any amount of additional income.

Medicare

1. Relief to persons unable to pay deductible charges under Medicare.

2. Relief to persons unable to have deducted from their Social Security checks the monthly fee for physician service coverage under Medicare.

3. Providing for uninterrupted nursing home care for those with chronic illness who require such care.

4. We will encourage low-cost insurance programs for the elderly and will assist the states and local communities in building hospitals, nursing homes, clinics as well as medical and nursing schools.

In this land of plenty, no one should be denied adequate medical care because of his financial condition.


Believe it or not, these proposals were made by the American Independent Party in 1968, the party whose presidential candidate was Governor George Wallace and whose VP candidate was General Curtis LeMay (Ret.) (LINK).

Wallace won five states and 46 Electoral College votes. He also got over 30% of the vote in South Carolina and North Carolina, over 20% of the vote in Florida and Virginia, and over 10% of the vote in Texas, Ohio, Missouri, Michigan, Nevada, Delaware, and Idaho.
They make all these proposals to get elected. Guess who NEVER. Brings them up for a vote…the same do nothing GOP since citizen United was enacted to fk over the the middle class.
 
There never has been a lock box for Social Security revenue. By law, since the 1930s, all Social Security surplus funds must be invested only in U.S. Treasury securities, and the two trust funds that pay SS benefits have never been part of the federal government's general fund.

This being said, the SS Administration has acknowledged that in about 11 years, SS revenue will only cover about 75% of SS benefit payments (LINK). What are our leaders doing about this? Right now, NOTHING.

I was not old enough to vote in 1968. But, knowing what I know now, if I could go back in time and vote in that election, I would probably vote for Humphrey.
Many didn’t vote for Humphrey because they were a political neophytes. Appearance and the idea you’d like to “ have a beer” with a particular candidate is why Trump wears so much make up and why some younger voters gravitate to appearance instead of substance. Really, most of us would just go along with the crowd regardless of our good intentions.
 
Believe it or not, these proposals were made by the American Independent Party in 1968, the party whose presidential candidate was Governor George Wallace and whose VP candidate was General Curtis LeMay (Ret.)

So we can all vote for racists, so long as they provide more services through Social Security.

And this is not even a "wobbler", or just a statement like most make where everybody they do not like is a racist. George Wallace was a racist.

Sorry, I simply can not take this seriously. Why not vote for Hitler? At least he promised the same things also. Or Pol Pot, he also had some great solutions in order to reduce the costs of such things as healthcare in his nation. Of course, he only killed somewhere around 1.5 million people to do that, but it worked. 1.5 million less people to drain the system.
 
So we can all vote for racists, so long as they provide more services through Social Security.

And this is not even a "wobbler", or just a statement like most make where everybody they do not like is a racist. George Wallace was a racist.

Sorry, I simply can not take this seriously. Why not vote for Hitler? At least he promised the same things also. Or Pol Pot, he also had some great solutions in order to reduce the costs of such things as healthcare in his nation. Of course, he only killed somewhere around 1.5 million people to do that, but it worked. 1.5 million less people to drain the system.
Exactly.
Trump promised great healthcare, then when in office with millions already enrolled in Obamacare, he was one vote away from stripping away Obamacare and the preexisting conditions provision, WITH NO PLAN. Obamacare would have disappeared and those millions would just fight with private providers, and thousands who would be without like before…..die, JUST IN TIME FOR THE COVID INFECTION WITH NO HEALTHCARE.
Most of DEATHS were and would be many more, Trump supporters.
Oh, he promised an infrastructure program….all we got was huge tax cuts for the rich, biggest deficits and covid deathbeds and a fiasco. We got a recession ! That comes with the gop package.
 
So we can all vote for racists, so long as they provide more services through Social Security.

And this is not even a "wobbler", or just a statement like most make where everybody they do not like is a racist. George Wallace was a racist.

Sorry, I simply can not take this seriously. Why not vote for Hitler? At least he promised the same things also. Or Pol Pot, he also had some great solutions in order to reduce the costs of such things as healthcare in his nation. Of course, he only killed somewhere around 1.5 million people to do that, but it worked. 1.5 million less people to drain the system.

FDR was a racist, a royal racist. He held extremely bigoted views about Asians. Woodrow Wilson was a staunch racist.

Do you think Wallace hated blacks? Do you think this because he opposed federally mandated school integration and busing? Are you aware that Wallace substantially increased funding for state programs that were aimed at helping blacks? Are you aware that in 1979 when asked about his opposition to integration he said, "I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over"?

If I had been an adult at the time, I would have profoundly disagreed with Wallace's support for all-white schools and universities, e.g., his support for prohibiting blacks from attending certain universities, but I also would have profoundly disagreed with government-imposed busing.

Wallace was not the monster that liberals have portrayed him as being. There was much more to him than his views on integration and busing. I say this as someone who likely would have voted for Humphrey if I had been an adult at the time.
 
FDR was a racist, a royal racist. He held extremely bigoted views about Asians. Woodrow Wilson was a staunch racist.

Do you think Wallace hated blacks? Do you think this because he opposed federally mandated school integration and busing? Are you aware that Wallace substantially increased funding for state programs that were aimed at helping blacks? Are you aware that in 1979 when asked about his opposition to integration he said, "I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over"?

If I had been an adult at the time, I would have profoundly disagreed with Wallace's support for all-white schools and universities, e.g., his support for prohibiting blacks from attending certain universities, but I also would have profoundly disagreed with government-imposed busing.

Wallace was not the monster that liberals have portrayed him as being. There was much more to him than his views on integration and busing. I say this as someone who likely would have voted for Humphrey if I had been an adult at the time.
Executive order 8802 by FDR to insure equal opportunity in hiring regardless of race. That included Asians.
 
George Wallace was a racist
It is still common for Democrats to be racists. FDR was a racist. Truman was the first Democrat to shy away from racists. Kennedy was not one. LBJ was a racist. Biden is a racist.
 
O-care needs to go away...
Do you have fking clue why O care was instituted ?
I’ll help you. The country was in the throws of a GOP started recession which means, millions were laid off and without employer based healthcare. Thousands were going bankrupt paying for private healthcare and losing their homes, and worse, dying from no insurance because private insurance didn’t cover PREEXISTING CONDITIONS or charged huge fees.
 
Executive order 8802 by FDR
The executive order did not establish full employment equality, but it did establish a Fair Employment Practices Committee (FEPC). The FEPC was solely an investigative and advisory committee and lacked enforcement powers.Aug 27, 2024
 
It is still common for Democrats to be racists. FDR was a racist. Truman was the first Democrat to shy away from racists. Kennedy was not one. LBJ was a racist. Biden is a racist.
That’s your usual lie. FDR signed executive order 8803 making it illegal to deny employment based upon race.m
 

Forum List

Back
Top