Hey! I didn't vote for this

Well actually yes you did you stupid Republicunt xxxxxxx:

View attachment 1054188

Trump's Comments on RFK Jr. and the Vaccine-Autism Link

Recently, Donald Trump made statements regarding Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) and his potential role as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Trump indicated that he is open to exploring the possibility of a link between childhood vaccines and autism, a topic that has been widely discredited by scientific research. During an interview, when asked about the long-standing consensus that vaccines do not cause autism, Trump responded, "I’m open to anything. I think somebody has to find out".

Context of the Vaccine-Autism Debate

The scientific community has consistently found no evidence supporting a link between vaccines and autism. For instance, a 2014 meta-analysis involving over 1.2 million children concluded that there is no association between vaccines and autism. Despite this, RFK Jr. has a history of vaccine skepticism and has promoted the debunked theory that vaccines contribute to autism.

Trump's willingness to entertain RFK Jr.'s investigation into this issue reflects a broader trend of vaccine skepticism that has gained traction in some political circles.

In summary, Trump's remarks suggest a potential shift in the conversation around vaccines, particularly if RFK Jr. assumes a significant role in health policy. However, it is crucial to recognize that the prevailing scientific evidence does not support the claims linking vaccines to autism.

Unfortunately, scientific evidence may not always be reliable. Here are four reasons:

1. Methodological Flaws: Research studies may have design issues, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or biased selection. These flaws can lead to skewed results that do not accurately represent the larger population.

2. Replication Crisis: Many scientific findings are difficult or impossible to replicate. A lack of reproducibility can undermine the validity of certain studies, casting doubt on their conclusions and leading to confusion about what is truly established knowledge.

3. Publication Bias: Studies that yield positive results are more likely to be published than those with negative or inconclusive outcomes. This bias can distort the scientific literature, making it appear that certain hypotheses are more supported than they actually are.

4. Evolving Understanding: Scientific knowledge is inherently provisional. As new evidence emerges, previous theories may be revised, replaced, or discarded. This dynamic nature means that 'what is considered reliable evidence today may be challenged or reinterpreted in the future.

These factors highlight the importance of critical thinking and continual scrutiny in the evaluation of scientific evidence. Just like Trump, I'm open to anything. But the big pharma must feel like a fish out of water! lol. :)

Sources:










 
Well actually yes you did you stupid Republicunt xxxxxxx:

View attachment 1054188


The losing Dems want to box us into an all or nothing corner. Which is stupid. Most of us are not saying ALL vaccines are junk and bad, but clearly, our infants and children are getting too many unnecessary vaccines these days.
 
The losing Dems want to box us into an all or nothing corner. Which is stupid. Most of us are not saying ALL vaccines are junk and bad, but clearly, our infants and children are getting too many unnecessary vaccines these days.
Why do you say that’s clearly the case?
 
Your fee fees hurt? LOL You post asshole comments, expect to be called out for pussy ass posting.
Was that an attempt to do a “turn the table” tactic?! Haha

Poorly executed. Fact is you make hyperbolic generalized straw man arguments. And that is a weak way to debate as you fail time and time again to explain yourself or provide details. Do better
 
Was that an attempt to do a “turn the table” tactic?! Haha

Poorly executed. Fact is you make hyperbolic generalized straw man arguments. And that is a weak way to debate as you fail time and time again to explain yourself or provide details. Do better
No need to get emotional. Stop posting like a pretentious condescending insulting scumbag and we won't call you out on it. Do better
 
No need to get emotional. Stop posting like a pretentious condescending insulting scumbag and we won't call you out on it. Do better
Seems to me like you’re trying to tell me to do something while doing it yourself. Isn’t that called hypocrisy?
 
Seems to me like you’re trying to tell me to do something while doing it yourself. Isn’t that called hyocrisy?
Why resort to hyperbole? I've never posted anything hypocritical and you can't prove it. You should log off for a while and rest and when you come back perhaps you can do better.
 
Yes I agree, Trumps deranged tweets are a bit much sometimes.
You think Trump is a dimtard cvnt?
If your screen name wasn’t such a gross misrepresentation, you’d know exactly who I was referring to.
 
Trump showed how dishonest the left wing and foreign information sources are in an hour and a half news conference that included the polio vaccine hoax but lefties can't let go of their anger and disappointment so they rely on lies from the "Guardian" and other sources.
 
Why resort to hyperbole? I've never posted anything hypocritical and you can't prove it. You should log off for a while and rest and when you come back perhaps you can do better.
Your last post was pure hypocrisy… attacking me for the way I post while posting in the exact same fashion.
 
Back
Top Bottom